iShares US Medical Devices UCITS ETF
iShares US Medical Devices UCITS ETF UMDV.AS Peers
See (UMDV.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMDV.AS | $6.70 | +0.69% | 219.71M | 32.28 | $0.21 | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | $100.22 | +0.39% | 91.65B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | $100.08 | +0.27% | 56.63B | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| VWRL.AS | $128.28 | +0.31% | 33.31B | N/A | N/A | +1.58% |
| SP5H.PA | $292.25 | +0.10% | 18.29B | 25.92 | $11.27 | +1.28% |
| IUSA.AS | $52.61 | +0.29% | 15.58B | N/A | N/A | +1.07% |
| AMUN.PA | $74.15 | -0.54% | 15.08B | 11.64 | $6.37 | +5.53% |
| ISFA.AS | $10.10 | +0.84% | 14.86B | N/A | N/A | +3.47% |
| HAL.AS | $119.20 | -0.17% | 10.77B | 8.90 | $13.39 | +2.39% |
| PSH.AS | $51.60 | N/A | 9.41B | 4.41 | $11.69 | +1.17% |
Stock Comparison
UMDV.AS vs IWDA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 91.65B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while IWDA.AS trades at $100.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs VUSA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 56.63B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while VUSA.AS trades at $100.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs VWRL.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 33.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while VWRL.AS trades at $128.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs SP5H.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 18.29B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while SP5H.PA trades at $292.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs IUSA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 15.58B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while IUSA.AS trades at $52.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs AMUN.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.08B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while AMUN.PA trades at $74.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ISFA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 14.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ISFA.AS trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs HAL.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 10.77B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while HAL.AS trades at $119.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs PSH.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.41B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while PSH.AS trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs WLDH.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while WLDH.PA trades at $211.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs WLD.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.22B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while WLD.PA trades at $342.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs CSH2.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while CSH2.PA trades at $106.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs MEUD.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 9.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while MEUD.PA trades at $260.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs IMEU.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 8.90B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while IMEU.AS trades at $34.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs GBLB.BR Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 8.67B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while GBLB.BR trades at $72.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 300.42. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs SOF.BR Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.34B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while SOF.BR trades at $252.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs I500.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while I500.AS trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs I50D.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.13B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while I50D.AS trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs LCWD.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while LCWD.PA trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs IWRD.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while IWRD.AS trades at $73.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs CC4.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.21B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while CC4.PA trades at $222.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs VHYL.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while VHYL.AS trades at $64.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs 500.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while 500.PA trades at $104.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs PHAU.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.73B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while PHAU.AS trades at $268.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs AEME.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while AEME.PA trades at $69.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs GOLD.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while GOLD.PA trades at $114.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs CW8.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while CW8.PA trades at $547.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs IJPA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while IJPA.AS trades at $52.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs RF.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while RF.PA trades at $69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -81.94. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs KBCA.BR Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while KBCA.BR trades at $62.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs VEUR.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while VEUR.AS trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs SP5C.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while SP5C.PA trades at $378.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ECRP.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ECRP.PA trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs S500H.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while S500H.PA trades at $83.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs S500.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while S500.PA trades at $149.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs IEMM.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while IEMM.AS trades at $40.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EUEA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EUEA.AS trades at $55.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs USAC.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while USAC.PA trades at $534.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs USA.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while USA.PA trades at $491.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs 500X.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while 500X.AS trades at $37.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs REINA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while REINA.AS trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ICHD.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ICHD.AS trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ICHN.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ICHN.AS trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs CAC.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while CAC.PA trades at $78.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs CACC.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while CACC.PA trades at $38.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs C50U.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while C50U.PA trades at $157.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs WSRI.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while WSRI.PA trades at $103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs MSE.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while MSE.PA trades at $59.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs MF.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while MF.PA trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -30.94. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs AUEM.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while AUEM.PA trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs C50.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while C50.PA trades at $140.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs CD5.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while CD5.PA trades at $86.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ROLA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ROLA.AS trades at $64.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs VERX.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while VERX.AS trades at $43.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs BREB.BR Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while BREB.BR trades at $115.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs AEEM.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while AEEM.PA trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs TKO.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while TKO.PA trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ALLFG.AS trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs CB3.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while CB3.PA trades at $219.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs WESE.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while WESE.PA trades at $69.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EEUE.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EEUE.PA trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs SEMD.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while SEMD.AS trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs UST.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while UST.PA trades at $77.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ESE.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ESE.PA trades at $26.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EUSRI.PA trades at $86.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs GEMU.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while GEMU.PA trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EHYA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EHYA.AS trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EPAB.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EPAB.PA trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs TDIV.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while TDIV.AS trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EXCH.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EXCH.AS trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs USRI.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while USRI.PA trades at $102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ANX.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ANX.PA trades at $217.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs PABW.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while PABW.PA trades at $76.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs PEUG.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while PEUG.PA trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs CMUD.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while CMUD.PA trades at $67.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ANTIN.PA trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs BNKE.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while BNKE.PA trades at $239.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs TNOW.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while TNOW.PA trades at $817.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EGOV.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EGOV.PA trades at $49.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs MUSD.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while MUSD.AS trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs WAT.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while WAT.PA trades at $67.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs GIMB.BR Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while GIMB.BR trades at $43.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EMPA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EMPA.AS trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs MPAB.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while MPAB.AS trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EGRI.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EGRI.PA trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs AASI.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while AASI.PA trades at $38.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs CG1.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while CG1.PA trades at $421.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs INR.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, INR.PA has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while INR.PA trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas INR.PA's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to INR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs LWCR.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while LWCR.PA trades at $501.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs PHAG.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while PHAG.AS trades at $26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ACWI.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ACWI.PA trades at $473.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs BNK.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while BNK.PA trades at $45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs EXA1.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while EXA1.AS trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs DAX.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while DAX.PA trades at $216.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs WQDA.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while WQDA.AS trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ESGE.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ESGE.PA trades at $34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs ESGH.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while ESGH.PA trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs MTE.PA Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, MTE.PA has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while MTE.PA trades at $197.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas MTE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is more volatile compared to MTE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.
UMDV.AS vs TFG.AS Comparison
UMDV.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMDV.AS stands at 219.71M. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, UMDV.AS is priced at $6.70, while TFG.AS trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMDV.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.28, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, UMDV.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMDV.AS is less volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMDV.AS.