Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF TREX.L Peers
See (TREX.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TREX.L | $35.18 | -0.20% | 513.17M | N/A | N/A | +4.36% |
| CE31.L | $9,649.00 | +0.08% | 175.84B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MTXX.L | $4,121.50 | +0.01% | 145.90B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CE01.L | $12,675.00 | -0.01% | 72.74B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EHYB.L | $3,293.25 | -0.17% | 19.53B | N/A | N/A | +3.14% |
| AT1D.L | $1,417.70 | -0.23% | 15.50B | N/A | N/A | +0.06% |
| IB01.L | $115.70 | +0.02% | 14.89B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UB82.L | $2,857.00 | -0.38% | 11.24B | N/A | N/A | +3.02% |
| GBP5.L | $966.55 | +0.09% | 10.19B | N/A | N/A | +4.24% |
| IEML.L | $44.43 | +0.05% | 7.65B | 1.33 | $33.40 | +5.58% |
Stock Comparison
TREX.L vs CE31.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, CE31.L has a market cap of 175.84B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while CE31.L trades at $9,649.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE31.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CE31.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to CE31.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs MTXX.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, MTXX.L has a market cap of 145.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while MTXX.L trades at $4,121.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MTXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to MTXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs CE01.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, CE01.L has a market cap of 72.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while CE01.L trades at $12,675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CE01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to CE01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs EHYB.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, EHYB.L has a market cap of 19.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while EHYB.L trades at $3,293.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EHYB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to EHYB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs AT1D.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, AT1D.L has a market cap of 15.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while AT1D.L trades at $1,417.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AT1D.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to AT1D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IB01.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IB01.L has a market cap of 14.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IB01.L trades at $115.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IB01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IB01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to IB01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs UB82.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, UB82.L has a market cap of 11.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while UB82.L trades at $2,857.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB82.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UB82.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to UB82.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs GBP5.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, GBP5.L has a market cap of 10.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while GBP5.L trades at $966.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBP5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBP5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to GBP5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IEML.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IEML.L has a market cap of 7.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IEML.L trades at $44.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEML.L's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEML.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to IEML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IGBE.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IGBE.L has a market cap of 7.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IGBE.L trades at $3,266.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGBE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to IGBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs GILI.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, GILI.L has a market cap of 6.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while GILI.L trades at $12,842.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GILI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to GILI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs CBU7.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, CBU7.L has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while CBU7.L trades at $136.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBU7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CBU7.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to CBU7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs GLBL.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, GLBL.L has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while GLBL.L trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBL.L's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLBL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to GLBL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IBTA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IBTA.L has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IBTA.L trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IBTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IBTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SDIA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SDIA.L has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SDIA.L trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SDIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to SDIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs LQDE.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, LQDE.L has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while LQDE.L trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LQDE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to LQDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SEGA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SEGA.L has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SEGA.L trades at $93.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SEGA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to SEGA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs CU71.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, CU71.L has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while CU71.L trades at $10,296.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU71.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CU71.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to CU71.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VECP.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VECP.L has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VECP.L trades at $40.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VECP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VECP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VECA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VECA.L has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VECA.L trades at $43.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VECA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VECA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VDCP.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VDCP.L has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VDCP.L trades at $46.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VDCP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VDCP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VDPA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VDPA.L has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VDPA.L trades at $57.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VDPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to VDPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IDTM.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IDTM.L has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IDTM.L trades at $172.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IDTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IDTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XBLC.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XBLC.L has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XBLC.L trades at $158.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBLC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XBLC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to XBLC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IUAA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IUAA.L has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IUAA.L trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IUAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs GLAD.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, GLAD.L has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while GLAD.L trades at $30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLAD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to GLAD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs GLAU.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, GLAU.L has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while GLAU.L trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to GLAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs GLAG.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, GLAG.L has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while GLAG.L trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to GLAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IE15.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IE15.L has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IE15.L trades at $107.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IE15.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SUOE.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SUOE.L has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SUOE.L trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SUOE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to SUOE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IEMB.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IEMB.L has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IEMB.L trades at $87.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VAGS.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VAGS.L has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VAGS.L trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VAGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to VAGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs ERNE.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, ERNE.L has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while ERNE.L trades at $102.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ERNE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to ERNE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs LQDA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, LQDA.L has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while LQDA.L trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LQDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to LQDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs LQDS.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, LQDS.L has a market cap of 3.31B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while LQDS.L trades at $7,514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to LQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SE15.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SE15.L has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SE15.L trades at $90.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to SE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VETA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VETA.L has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VETA.L trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VETA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VETA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VETY.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VETY.L has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VETY.L trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VETY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to VETY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IBTM.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IBTM.L has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IBTM.L trades at $129.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IBTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IBTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs ERN1.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, ERN1.L has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while ERN1.L trades at $86.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERN1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ERN1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to ERN1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XGLE.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XGLE.L has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XGLE.L trades at $219.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGLE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XGLE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to XGLE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IHYU.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IHYU.L has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IHYU.L trades at $96.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYU.L's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IHYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IHYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IDBT.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IDBT.L has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IDBT.L trades at $127.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IDBT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to IDBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XGGB.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XGGB.L has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XGGB.L trades at $241.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XGGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to XGGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs EMGA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, EMGA.L has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while EMGA.L trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EMGA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to EMGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SEMB.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SEMB.L has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SEMB.L trades at $6,608.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to SEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VDTY.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VDTY.L has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VDTY.L trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VDTY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VDTY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs FLOA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, FLOA.L has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while FLOA.L trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FLOA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to FLOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XT0D.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XT0D.L has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XT0D.L trades at $60.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XT0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to XT0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XGSI.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XGSI.L has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XGSI.L trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XGSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to XGSI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VDCA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VDCA.L has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VDCA.L trades at $58.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VDCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VDCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IBTS.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IBTS.L has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IBTS.L trades at $95.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IBTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IBTS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SEML.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SEML.L has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SEML.L trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to SEML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IBGX.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IBGX.L has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IBGX.L trades at $137.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to IBGX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs DTLA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, DTLA.L has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while DTLA.L trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DTLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to DTLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IHYA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IHYA.L has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IHYA.L trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYA.L's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IHYA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IHYA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VCPA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VCPA.L has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VCPA.L trades at $43.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VCPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VCPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XT01.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XT01.L has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XT01.L trades at $45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XT01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to XT01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XGSG.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XGSG.L has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XGSG.L trades at $2,384.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XGSG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to XGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs 0GGH.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, 0GGH.L has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while 0GGH.L trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GGH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0GGH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to 0GGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs AGGG.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, AGGG.L has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while AGGG.L trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to AGGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IBGS.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IBGS.L has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IBGS.L trades at $119.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to IBGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VSCA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VSCA.L has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VSCA.L trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XHYG.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XHYG.L has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XHYG.L trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to XHYG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SDIG.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SDIG.L has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SDIG.L trades at $100.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to SDIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs ERNA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, ERNA.L has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while ERNA.L trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ERNA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to ERNA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs GCVB.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, GCVB.L has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while GCVB.L trades at $52.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCVB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GCVB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to GCVB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs ERNS.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, ERNS.L has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while ERNS.L trades at $102.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ERNS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to ERNS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VDTA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VDTA.L has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VDTA.L trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VDTA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VDTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs CORP.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, CORP.L has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while CORP.L trades at $87.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CORP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to CORP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs EMSA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, EMSA.L has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while EMSA.L trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EMSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to EMSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs CRHG.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, CRHG.L has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while CRHG.L trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CRHG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to CRHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IDTL.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IDTL.L has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IDTL.L trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IDTL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IDTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IGTM.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IGTM.L has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IGTM.L trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IGTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs EMCA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, EMCA.L has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while EMCA.L trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EMCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to EMCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs EMDL.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, EMDL.L has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while EMDL.L trades at $42.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMDL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EMDL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to EMDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XZE5.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XZE5.L has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XZE5.L trades at $39.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZE5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XZE5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to XZE5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VDEA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VDEA.L has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VDEA.L trades at $57.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VDEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to VDEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VDET.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VDET.L has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VDET.L trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VDET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VDET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs XDGU.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, XDGU.L has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while XDGU.L trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to XDGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IBCI.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IBCI.L has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IBCI.L trades at $192.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to IBCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VUTA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VUTA.L has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VUTA.L trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VUTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to VUTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs CRPS.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, CRPS.L has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while CRPS.L trades at $65.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CRPS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to CRPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IUAG.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IUAG.L has a market cap of 988.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IUAG.L trades at $93.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IUAG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs EEXF.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, EEXF.L has a market cap of 981.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while EEXF.L trades at $92.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEXF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EEXF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to EEXF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IBTL.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IBTL.L has a market cap of 977.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IBTL.L trades at $240.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IBTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IBTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IGLO.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IGLO.L has a market cap of 948.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IGLO.L trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IGLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs V3GP.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, V3GP.L has a market cap of 925.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while V3GP.L trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3GP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to V3GP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to V3GP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VEMA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VEMA.L has a market cap of 915.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VEMA.L trades at $43.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to VEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs VEMT.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, VEMT.L has a market cap of 911.65M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while VEMT.L trades at $31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VEMT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to VEMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SDHA.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SDHA.L has a market cap of 904.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SDHA.L trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHA.L's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SDHA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to SDHA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs EFRN.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, EFRN.L has a market cap of 875.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while EFRN.L trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFRN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EFRN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to EFRN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs HYLD.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, HYLD.L has a market cap of 816.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while HYLD.L trades at $88.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLD.L's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to HYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SDHY.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SDHY.L has a market cap of 811.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SDHY.L trades at $88.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY.L's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SDHY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to SDHY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs TIGR.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, TIGR.L has a market cap of 781.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while TIGR.L trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TIGR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to TIGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs SUAG.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, SUAG.L has a market cap of 743.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while SUAG.L trades at $70.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to SUAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs IBGL.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, IBGL.L has a market cap of 715.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while IBGL.L trades at $143.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is less volatile compared to IBGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs ERND.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, ERND.L has a market cap of 711.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while ERND.L trades at $101.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ERND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to ERND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.
TREX.L vs HYGU.L Comparison
TREX.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREX.L stands at 513.17M. In comparison, HYGU.L has a market cap of 705.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TREX.L is priced at $35.18, while HYGU.L trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREX.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREX.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HYGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREX.L is more volatile compared to HYGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREX.L.