Cambium Global Timberland Limited
Cambium Global Timberland Limited TREE.L Peers
See (TREE.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TREE.L | $6.75 | N/A | N/A | 0.11 | $0.60 | N/A |
| IH2O.L | $5,352.50 | +1.08% | 170.84B | N/A | N/A | +1.17% |
| INRG.L | $557.50 | +0.27% | 146.93B | N/A | N/A | +1.34% |
| PRIW.L | $3,008.63 | +1.36% | 116.76B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JMRE.L | $2,532.50 | -0.03% | 108.45B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XGSD.L | $2,532.50 | +0.22% | 54.59B | N/A | N/A | +5.40% |
| ROBG.L | $1,705.75 | +0.47% | 44.58B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BCHS.L | $8,477.50 | +2.88% | 44.26B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LGGG.L | $1,602.60 | +0.58% | 28.49B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XSGI.L | $5,129.50 | +0.62% | 25.26B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TREE.L vs IH2O.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IH2O.L has a market cap of 170.84B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while IH2O.L trades at $5,352.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas IH2O.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IH2O.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to IH2O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs INRG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, INRG.L has a market cap of 146.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while INRG.L trades at $557.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas INRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to INRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs PRIW.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PRIW.L has a market cap of 116.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while PRIW.L trades at $3,008.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas PRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRIW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to PRIW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs JMRE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JMRE.L has a market cap of 108.45B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while JMRE.L trades at $2,532.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas JMRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JMRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to JMRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs XGSD.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, XGSD.L has a market cap of 54.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while XGSD.L trades at $2,532.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas XGSD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XGSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to XGSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs ROBG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ROBG.L has a market cap of 44.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while ROBG.L trades at $1,705.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas ROBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to ROBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs BCHS.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BCHS.L has a market cap of 44.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while BCHS.L trades at $8,477.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas BCHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to BCHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs LGGG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LGGG.L has a market cap of 28.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while LGGG.L trades at $1,602.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas LGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to LGGG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs XSGI.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, XSGI.L has a market cap of 25.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while XSGI.L trades at $5,129.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas XSGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XSGI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to XSGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GGRG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GGRG.L has a market cap of 23.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GGRG.L trades at $3,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GGRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GGRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs PRIG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PRIG.L has a market cap of 11.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while PRIG.L trades at $1,438.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas PRIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRIG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to PRIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs JREG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JREG.L has a market cap of 9.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while JREG.L trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas JREG.L's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JREG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to JREG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs CECL.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CECL.L has a market cap of 8.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while CECL.L trades at $1,648.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas CECL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CECL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to CECL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs SBUY.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SBUY.L has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while SBUY.L trades at $4,483.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas SBUY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBUY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to SBUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs FCSG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FCSG.L has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while FCSG.L trades at $3,218.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas FCSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to FCSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs JGRE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JGRE.L has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while JGRE.L trades at $3,947.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas JGRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JGRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to JGRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GLAB.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GLAB.L has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GLAB.L trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GLAB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLAB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GLAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs RBE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RBE.L has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while RBE.L trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas RBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to RBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs DH2O.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DH2O.L has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while DH2O.L trades at $71.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas DH2O.L's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DH2O.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to DH2O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GAGU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GAGU.L has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GAGU.L trades at $54.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GAGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GAGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs HVPE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HVPE.L has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while HVPE.L trades at $2,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas HVPE.L's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HVPE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to HVPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs IDIN.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IDIN.L has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while IDIN.L trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas IDIN.L's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDIN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to IDIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs IGSU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IGSU.L has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while IGSU.L trades at $77.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas IGSU.L's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IGSU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to IGSU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs MAGI.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MAGI.L has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while MAGI.L trades at $34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas MAGI.L's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAGI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to MAGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs PRWU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PRWU.L has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while PRWU.L trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas PRWU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRWU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to PRWU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs JREM.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JREM.L has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while JREM.L trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas JREM.L's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JREM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to JREM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GLDV.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GLDV.L has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GLDV.L trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GLDV.L's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GLDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs V3AB.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, V3AB.L has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while V3AB.L trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas V3AB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to V3AB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to V3AB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs V3AL.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, V3AL.L has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while V3AL.L trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas V3AL.L's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to V3AL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to V3AL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs V3AA.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, V3AA.L has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while V3AA.L trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas V3AA.L's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to V3AA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to V3AA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs BBGI.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BBGI.L has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while BBGI.L trades at $142.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas BBGI.L's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBGI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to BBGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs AGT.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AGT.L has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while AGT.L trades at $236.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas AGT.L's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGT.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to AGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs JPCT.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JPCT.L has a market cap of 966.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while JPCT.L trades at $43.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas JPCT.L's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPCT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to JPCT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GBDV.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GBDV.L has a market cap of 926.78M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GBDV.L trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GBDV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GBDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs IQSA.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IQSA.L has a market cap of 889.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while IQSA.L trades at $82.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas IQSA.L's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IQSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to IQSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GGRA.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GGRA.L has a market cap of 759.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GGRA.L trades at $41.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GGRA.L's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GGRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GSCT.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GSCT.L has a market cap of 705.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GSCT.L trades at $158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GSCT.L's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSCT.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GSCT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs XGDD.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, XGDD.L has a market cap of 643.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while XGDD.L trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas XGDD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XGDD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to XGDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs PCFT.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PCFT.L has a market cap of 627.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while PCFT.L trades at $207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas PCFT.L's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCFT.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to PCFT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GDIG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GDIG.L has a market cap of 602.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GDIG.L trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GDIG.L's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GDIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs ROBO.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ROBO.L has a market cap of 592.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while ROBO.L trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas ROBO.L's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROBO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to ROBO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs BCHN.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BCHN.L has a market cap of 592.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while BCHN.L trades at $111.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas BCHN.L's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCHN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to BCHN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs APAX.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, APAX.L has a market cap of 585.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while APAX.L trades at $120.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas APAX.L's P/E ratio is 120.80. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to APAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs QYLD.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, QYLD.L has a market cap of 501.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while QYLD.L trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas QYLD.L's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to QYLD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs QYLU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, QYLU.L has a market cap of 500.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while QYLU.L trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas QYLU.L's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QYLU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to QYLU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs LUXU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LUXU.L has a market cap of 492.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while LUXU.L trades at $227.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas LUXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LUXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to LUXU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs PAVE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PAVE.L has a market cap of 477.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while PAVE.L trades at $38.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas PAVE.L's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to PAVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs PCGH.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PCGH.L has a market cap of 384.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while PCGH.L trades at $317.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas PCGH.L's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCGH.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to PCGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs QYLP.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, QYLP.L has a market cap of 378.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while QYLP.L trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas QYLP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QYLP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to QYLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs LGGL.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LGGL.L has a market cap of 376.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while LGGL.L trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas LGGL.L's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGGL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to LGGL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs SDIP.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SDIP.L has a market cap of 372.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while SDIP.L trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas SDIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to SDIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs SDIU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SDIU.L has a market cap of 371.24M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while SDIU.L trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas SDIU.L's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDIU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to SDIU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs SKYU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SKYU.L has a market cap of 362.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while SKYU.L trades at $40.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas SKYU.L's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to SKYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs PAVG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PAVG.L has a market cap of 360.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while PAVG.L trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas PAVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to PAVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs INFR.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, INFR.L has a market cap of 345.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while INFR.L trades at $2,582.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas INFR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INFR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to INFR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GLRE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GLRE.L has a market cap of 311.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GLRE.L trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GLRE.L's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GLRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GLRA.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GLRA.L has a market cap of 306.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GLRA.L trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GLRA.L's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GLRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs TRET.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TRET.L has a market cap of 304.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while TRET.L trades at $42.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas TRET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to TRET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GGOV.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GGOV.L has a market cap of 271.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GGOV.L trades at $3,886.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GGOV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGOV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GGOV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GGRP.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GGRP.L has a market cap of 251.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GGRP.L trades at $2,639.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GGRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GGRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GSEO.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GSEO.L has a market cap of 250.15M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GSEO.L trades at $63.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GSEO.L's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSEO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GSEO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GENE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GENE.L has a market cap of 236.04M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GENE.L trades at $1,633.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GENE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GENE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GENE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GBRE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GBRE.L has a market cap of 234.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GBRE.L trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GBRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GBRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs EGL.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EGL.L has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while EGL.L trades at $209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas EGL.L's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGL.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to EGL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs EPRA.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EPRA.L has a market cap of 211.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while EPRA.L trades at $5,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas EPRA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to EPRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs JPLG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JPLG.L has a market cap of 192.83M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while JPLG.L trades at $3,121.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas JPLG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPLG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to JPLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs URNU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, URNU.L has a market cap of 190.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while URNU.L trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas URNU.L's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to URNU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to URNU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs MNP.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MNP.L has a market cap of 184.80M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while MNP.L trades at $315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas MNP.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to MNP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs JARU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JARU.L has a market cap of 183.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while JARU.L trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas JARU.L's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JARU.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to JARU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs COPX.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, COPX.L has a market cap of 152.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while COPX.L trades at $29.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas COPX.L's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to COPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs URND.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, URND.L has a market cap of 142.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while URND.L trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas URND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to URND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to URND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs FLXX.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FLXX.L has a market cap of 107.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while FLXX.L trades at $27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas FLXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to FLXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GOGB.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GOGB.L has a market cap of 97.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GOGB.L trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GOGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GOGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs FGLS.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FGLS.L has a market cap of 83.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while FGLS.L trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas FGLS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGLS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to FGLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs FGLR.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FGLR.L has a market cap of 83.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while FGLR.L trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas FGLR.L's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGLR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to FGLR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs CESG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CESG.L has a market cap of 58.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while CESG.L trades at $42.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas CESG.L's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CESG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to CESG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs 0P00018XAR.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P00018XAR.L has a market cap of 49.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while 0P00018XAR.L trades at $223.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas 0P00018XAR.L's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0P00018XAR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to 0P00018XAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs 0P00018XAO.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P00018XAO.L has a market cap of 49.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while 0P00018XAO.L trades at $194.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas 0P00018XAO.L's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0P00018XAO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to 0P00018XAO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs BUG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BUG.L has a market cap of 45.65M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while BUG.L trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas BUG.L's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BUG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to BUG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GEND.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GEND.L has a market cap of 41.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GEND.L trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GEND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GEND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GEDV.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GEDV.L has a market cap of 22.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GEDV.L trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GEDV.L's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GEDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs FLXG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FLXG.L has a market cap of 20.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while FLXG.L trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas FLXG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLXG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to FLXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GCED.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GCED.L has a market cap of 20.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GCED.L trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GCED.L's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCED.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GCED.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs FRGE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FRGE.L has a market cap of 20.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while FRGE.L trades at $39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas FRGE.L's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRGE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to FRGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs KZG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KZG.L has a market cap of 19.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while KZG.L trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas KZG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KZG.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to KZG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs PMGR.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PMGR.L has a market cap of 18.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while PMGR.L trades at $99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas PMGR.L's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMGR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to PMGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs SKYP.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SKYP.L has a market cap of 16.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while SKYP.L trades at $915.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas SKYP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKYP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to SKYP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs AMAL.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AMAL.L has a market cap of 13.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while AMAL.L trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas AMAL.L's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMAL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to AMAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs METR.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, METR.L has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while METR.L trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas METR.L's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to METR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to METR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs 0P000185T6.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P000185T6.L has a market cap of 9.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while 0P000185T6.L trades at $166.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas 0P000185T6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0P000185T6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs 0P000185T5.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P000185T5.L has a market cap of 9.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while 0P000185T5.L trades at $195.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas 0P000185T5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0P000185T5.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs HBKU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HBKU.L has a market cap of 9.39M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while HBKU.L trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas HBKU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBKU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to HBKU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GNOM.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GNOM.L has a market cap of 7.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GNOM.L trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GNOM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GNOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs DRVE.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DRVE.L has a market cap of 6.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while DRVE.L trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas DRVE.L's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to DRVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs GNOG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GNOG.L has a market cap of 6.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while GNOG.L trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas GNOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to GNOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs HERU.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HERU.L has a market cap of 5.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while HERU.L trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas HERU.L's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HERU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to HERU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs DRVG.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DRVG.L has a market cap of 4.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while DRVG.L trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas DRVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to DRVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs JETS.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JETS.L has a market cap of 4.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while JETS.L trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas JETS.L's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JETS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to JETS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.
TREE.L vs 0P000185T4.L Comparison
TREE.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TREE.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P000185T4.L has a market cap of 4.38M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.L is priced at $6.75, while 0P000185T4.L trades at $247.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TREE.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.11, whereas 0P000185T4.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0P000185T4.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.L.