Traction Uranium Corp.
Traction Uranium Corp. TRCTF Peers
See (TRCTF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRCTF | $0.22 | +2.19% | 2.05M | -1.58 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.40 | +0.18% | 128.91B | 11.34 | $2.24 | +4.88% |
| RTNTF | $78.66 | +6.29% | 109.06B | 11.13 | $7.07 | +2.99% |
| RTPPF | $57.54 | -7.19% | 98.45B | 8.14 | $7.07 | +6.99% |
| GLCNF | $3.58 | +1.27% | 42.96B | -27.50 | -$0.13 | +3.22% |
| GLNCY | $7.14 | +1.64% | 42.87B | -27.44 | -$0.26 | +3.01% |
| GMBXF | $5.25 | -2.34% | 40.90B | 11.42 | $0.46 | +2.47% |
| NGLOY | $14.83 | +4.00% | 35.99B | -11.77 | -$1.26 | +2.16% |
| AAUKF | $28.02 | N/A | 34.00B | -11.08 | -$2.53 | +2.27% |
| FSUGY | $21.65 | +3.10% | 33.28B | 8.56 | $2.53 | +8.39% |
Stock Comparison
TRCTF vs BHPLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while BHPLF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs RTNTF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 109.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while RTNTF trades at $78.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs RTPPF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.45B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while RTPPF trades at $57.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs GLCNF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while GLCNF trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs GLNCY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while GLNCY trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.44. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs GMBXF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 40.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while GMBXF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs NGLOY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 35.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while NGLOY trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs AAUKF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 34.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while AAUKF trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs FSUGY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 33.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while FSUGY trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs FSUMF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while FSUMF trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and FSUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs CMCLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while CMCLF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs TCKRF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs IVPAF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while IVPAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs SHTLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs BOLIF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs BDNNY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while BDNNY trades at $64.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs JXMNF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs IPOAF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while IPOAF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 111.11. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ABML Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs SMMYY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while SMMYY trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs STMNF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs PUTKF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs PUTKY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while PUTKY trades at $26.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs NILSY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs LYSCF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while LYSCF trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 118.50. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs LYSDY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while LYSDY trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 117.75. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs PAEKY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs PILBF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while PILBF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -103.20. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs MALRY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MALRY trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs FLMMF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs CHZQ Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs MIMTF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs IPGDF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs AZZVF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs MALRF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs DWMNF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs NGXXF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while NGXXF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -35.90. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs IIDDY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs SOUHY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while SOUHY trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.31. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ERMAY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ERMAY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.67. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs ERMAF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs PTNDY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs NICMF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while NICMF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs AFBOF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs PTNDF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs DETRF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while DETRF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ILKAF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ILKAF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and ILKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs FMCXF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while FMCXF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -66.77. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs AZRMF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs LINRF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while LINRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ILKAY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ILKAY trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs BQSSF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while BQSSF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.75. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs STTSY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ADMLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 911.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ADMLF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.89. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ADTLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 890.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ADTLF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ATUSF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 885.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ATUSF trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs AUSDF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs JMXXF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs AFMJF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 855.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs AMVMF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 738.96M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while AMVMF trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -22.23. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs VULNF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 670.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while VULNF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs NCKAF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 638.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while NCKAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs MFRVF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs CTJHF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs TAOFF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ALMTF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 497.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ALMTF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs TTNNF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs OSTTF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs PXMFF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 481.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs MJDLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 475.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MJDLF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and MJDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs MCRZF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs BIRNF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs NQMIY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs REEMF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 367.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while REEMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -17.80. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs FGOVF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 364.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while FGOVF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -69.02. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs MCHHF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ERLFF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 357.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ERLFF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -34.47. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs CTJHY Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs MNXMF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 336.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MNXMF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs KMRPF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs MLYF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs MLXEF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 314.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while MLXEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and MLXEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs AUMTF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs ARAFF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 304.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs SLGGF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs CGMLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 283.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while CGMLF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs LTSRF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 280.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs SVMLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 278.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while SVMLF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs LRSRF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs FWEDF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 256.96M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while FWEDF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs PMETF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 253.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while PMETF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -53.67. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs STQNF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs SYAAF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 239.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while SYAAF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs RXRLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs LTHHF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs BSRUF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs PTTMF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.
TRCTF vs CILLF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF and CILLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TRCTF vs ERDCF Comparison
TRCTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRCTF stands at 2.05M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 231.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TRCTF is priced at $0.22, while ERDCF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRCTF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -63.89. In terms of profitability, TRCTF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRCTF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRCTF.