VanEck AEX UCITS ETF
VanEck AEX UCITS ETF TDT.AS Peers
See (TDT.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDT.AS | $94.18 | +0.19% | 326.26M | 18.48 | $5.10 | +2.08% |
| IWDA.AS | $99.65 | -0.93% | 91.28B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | $100.21 | +0.08% | 55.94B | N/A | N/A | +1.08% |
| VWRL.AS | $128.68 | +0.23% | 33.05B | N/A | N/A | +1.57% |
| SP5H.PA | $294.55 | +0.10% | 18.42B | 26.12 | $11.27 | +1.27% |
| IUSA.AS | $52.03 | -1.20% | 15.20B | N/A | N/A | +1.07% |
| AMUN.PA | $74.65 | +0.47% | 15.19B | 11.72 | $6.37 | +5.52% |
| ISFA.AS | $10.24 | -0.28% | 15.08B | N/A | N/A | +3.41% |
| HAL.AS | $117.00 | +0.86% | 10.57B | 8.74 | $13.38 | +2.50% |
| PSH.AS | $51.60 | N/A | 9.41B | 4.41 | $11.69 | +1.20% |
Stock Comparison
TDT.AS vs IWDA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 91.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while IWDA.AS trades at $99.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs VUSA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 55.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while VUSA.AS trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs VWRL.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 33.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while VWRL.AS trades at $128.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs SP5H.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 18.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while SP5H.PA trades at $294.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs IUSA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 15.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while IUSA.AS trades at $52.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs AMUN.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while AMUN.PA trades at $74.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ISFA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 15.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ISFA.AS trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs HAL.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 10.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while HAL.AS trades at $117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs PSH.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while PSH.AS trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs WLD.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while WLD.PA trades at $343.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs WLDH.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while WLDH.PA trades at $213.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs CSH2.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 9.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while CSH2.PA trades at $106.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs MEUD.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 9.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while MEUD.PA trades at $263.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs IMEU.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while IMEU.AS trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs GBLB.BR Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while GBLB.BR trades at $72.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 302.71. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs SOF.BR Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while SOF.BR trades at $249.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs I500.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while I500.AS trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs I50D.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while I50D.AS trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs LCWD.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while LCWD.PA trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs IWRD.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while IWRD.AS trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs CC4.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while CC4.PA trades at $222.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs VHYL.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 6.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while VHYL.AS trades at $64.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs 500.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while 500.PA trades at $102.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs GOLD.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while GOLD.PA trades at $115.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs AEME.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while AEME.PA trades at $68.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs CW8.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while CW8.PA trades at $544.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs PHAU.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while PHAU.AS trades at $272.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs IJPA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while IJPA.AS trades at $52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs KBCA.BR Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while KBCA.BR trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs VEUR.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while VEUR.AS trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs SP5C.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while SP5C.PA trades at $379.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ECRP.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ECRP.PA trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs S500H.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while S500H.PA trades at $83.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs S500.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while S500.PA trades at $149.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs RF.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while RF.PA trades at $66.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EUEA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EUEA.AS trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs IEMM.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while IEMM.AS trades at $40.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs REINA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while REINA.AS trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs USA.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while USA.PA trades at $495.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs USAC.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while USAC.PA trades at $534.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ICHD.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ICHD.AS trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ICHN.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ICHN.AS trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs 500X.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while 500X.AS trades at $36.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs C50U.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while C50U.PA trades at $160.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs CAC.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while CAC.PA trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs CACC.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while CACC.PA trades at $38.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs WSRI.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while WSRI.PA trades at $103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs MSE.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while MSE.PA trades at $60.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs AUEM.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while AUEM.PA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs MF.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while MF.PA trades at $85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -29.32. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs CD5.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while CD5.PA trades at $87.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs C50.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while C50.PA trades at $141.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ROLA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ROLA.AS trades at $64.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs VERX.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while VERX.AS trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs BREB.BR Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while BREB.BR trades at $116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs TKO.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while TKO.PA trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs AEEM.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while AEEM.PA trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs WESE.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while WESE.PA trades at $70.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ALLFG.AS trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs CB3.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while CB3.PA trades at $219.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EEUE.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EEUE.PA trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs UST.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while UST.PA trades at $76.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs SEMD.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while SEMD.AS trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EHYA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EHYA.AS trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EUSRI.PA trades at $87.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ESE.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ESE.PA trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs GEMU.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while GEMU.PA trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EPAB.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EPAB.PA trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs TDIV.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while TDIV.AS trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EXCH.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EXCH.AS trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs USRI.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while USRI.PA trades at $102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ANX.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ANX.PA trades at $214.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs PABW.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while PABW.PA trades at $76.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs PEUG.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while PEUG.PA trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ANTIN.PA trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs CMUD.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while CMUD.PA trades at $68.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs BNKE.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while BNKE.PA trades at $246.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs TNOW.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while TNOW.PA trades at $806.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs PHAG.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while PHAG.AS trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EGOV.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EGOV.PA trades at $49.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs MUSD.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while MUSD.AS trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs WAT.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while WAT.PA trades at $69.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs GIMB.BR Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while GIMB.BR trades at $44.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs MPAB.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while MPAB.AS trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EMPA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EMPA.AS trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EGRI.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EGRI.PA trades at $45.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs AASI.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while AASI.PA trades at $38.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs CG1.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while CG1.PA trades at $426.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs LWCR.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while LWCR.PA trades at $498.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ACWI.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ACWI.PA trades at $471.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs BNK.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while BNK.PA trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs INR.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, INR.PA has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while INR.PA trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas INR.PA's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to INR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs EXA1.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while EXA1.AS trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs WQDA.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while WQDA.AS trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs DAX.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while DAX.PA trades at $219.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ESGE.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ESGE.PA trades at $35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs ESGH.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while ESGH.PA trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs TFG.AS Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while TFG.AS trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is less volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.
TDT.AS vs MTE.PA Comparison
TDT.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDT.AS stands at 326.26M. In comparison, MTE.PA has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TDT.AS is priced at $94.18, while MTE.PA trades at $197.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MTE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDT.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TDT.AS is more volatile compared to MTE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDT.AS.