PIMCO ETFs plc - PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF
PIMCO ETFs plc - PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF STHS.L Peers
See (STHS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STHS.L | $8.85 | +0.12% | 27.87M | N/A | N/A | +7.65% |
| CE31.L | $9,688.00 | +0.22% | 176.26B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MTXX.L | $4,148.75 | -0.10% | 147.34B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CE01.L | $12,770.00 | -0.14% | 72.90B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EHYB.L | $3,295.00 | +0.08% | 19.56B | N/A | N/A | +3.13% |
| AT1D.L | $1,413.20 | +0.19% | 15.45B | N/A | N/A | +0.06% |
| IB01.L | $115.80 | +0.02% | 15.32B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UB82.L | $2,851.00 | +0.05% | 11.27B | N/A | N/A | +3.03% |
| GBP5.L | $965.91 | +0.11% | 10.17B | N/A | N/A | +4.25% |
| IEML.L | $44.87 | +0.20% | 7.72B | 1.34 | $33.40 | +5.54% |
Stock Comparison
STHS.L vs CE31.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, CE31.L has a market cap of 176.26B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while CE31.L trades at $9,688.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE31.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE31.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to CE31.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs MTXX.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, MTXX.L has a market cap of 147.34B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while MTXX.L trades at $4,148.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to MTXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs CE01.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, CE01.L has a market cap of 72.90B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while CE01.L trades at $12,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to CE01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs EHYB.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, EHYB.L has a market cap of 19.56B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while EHYB.L trades at $3,295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to EHYB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs AT1D.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, AT1D.L has a market cap of 15.45B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while AT1D.L trades at $1,413.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1D.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to AT1D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IB01.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IB01.L has a market cap of 15.32B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IB01.L trades at $115.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IB01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IB01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IB01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs UB82.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, UB82.L has a market cap of 11.27B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while UB82.L trades at $2,851.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB82.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB82.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to UB82.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs GBP5.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, GBP5.L has a market cap of 10.17B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while GBP5.L trades at $965.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBP5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBP5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to GBP5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IEML.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IEML.L has a market cap of 7.72B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IEML.L trades at $44.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEML.L's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IEML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IGBE.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IGBE.L has a market cap of 7.54B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IGBE.L trades at $3,260.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGBE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IGBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs GILI.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, GILI.L has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while GILI.L trades at $12,788.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is less volatile compared to GILI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs CBU7.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, CBU7.L has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while CBU7.L trades at $137.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBU7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBU7.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to CBU7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs GLBL.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, GLBL.L has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while GLBL.L trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBL.L's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLBL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to GLBL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IBTA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IBTA.L has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IBTA.L trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IBTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs SDIA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, SDIA.L has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while SDIA.L trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to SDIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs SEGA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, SEGA.L has a market cap of 4.39B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while SEGA.L trades at $93.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEGA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to SEGA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs CU71.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, CU71.L has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while CU71.L trades at $10,238.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU71.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU71.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to CU71.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs LQDE.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, LQDE.L has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while LQDE.L trades at $100.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to LQDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VECP.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VECP.L has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VECP.L trades at $41.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VECP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VECA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VECA.L has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VECA.L trades at $43.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VECA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VDCP.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VDCP.L has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VDCP.L trades at $46.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VDCP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VDPA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VDPA.L has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VDPA.L trades at $57.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VDPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IUAA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IUAA.L has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IUAA.L trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IUAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XBLC.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XBLC.L has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XBLC.L trades at $159.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBLC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBLC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to XBLC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs GLAG.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, GLAG.L has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while GLAG.L trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to GLAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs GLAU.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, GLAU.L has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while GLAU.L trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to GLAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs GLAD.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, GLAD.L has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while GLAD.L trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to GLAD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IDTM.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IDTM.L has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IDTM.L trades at $169.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is less volatile compared to IDTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IE15.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IE15.L has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IE15.L trades at $108.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs SUOE.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, SUOE.L has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while SUOE.L trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to SUOE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IEMB.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IEMB.L has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IEMB.L trades at $87.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is less volatile compared to IEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs LQDA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, LQDA.L has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while LQDA.L trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to LQDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs ERNE.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, ERNE.L has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while ERNE.L trades at $102.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to ERNE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs BBIL.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, BBIL.L has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while BBIL.L trades at $115.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to BBIL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs SE15.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, SE15.L has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while SE15.L trades at $91.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to SE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VETA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VETA.L has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VETA.L trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VETA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VETY.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VETY.L has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VETY.L trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is less volatile compared to VETY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs LQDS.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, LQDS.L has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while LQDS.L trades at $7,419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to LQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs ERN1.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, ERN1.L has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while ERN1.L trades at $86.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERN1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERN1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to ERN1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IHYU.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IHYU.L has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IHYU.L trades at $93.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYU.L's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IHYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XGLE.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XGLE.L has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XGLE.L trades at $221.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGLE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGLE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to XGLE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IBTM.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IBTM.L has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IBTM.L trades at $126.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is less volatile compared to IBTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IDBT.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IDBT.L has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IDBT.L trades at $127.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDBT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IDBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XGGB.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XGGB.L has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XGGB.L trades at $241.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is less volatile compared to XGGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs EMGA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, EMGA.L has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while EMGA.L trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMGA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is less volatile compared to EMGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs SEMB.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, SEMB.L has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while SEMB.L trades at $6,566.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to SEMB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VDTA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VDTA.L has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VDTA.L trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VDTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VDTY.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VDTY.L has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VDTY.L trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VDTY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs FLOA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, FLOA.L has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while FLOA.L trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLOA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to FLOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XGSI.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XGSI.L has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XGSI.L trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to XGSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XT0D.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XT0D.L has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XT0D.L trades at $60.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to XT0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VDCA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VDCA.L has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VDCA.L trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VDCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VDUC.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VDUC.L has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VDUC.L trades at $49.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDUC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDUC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VDUC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IBTS.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IBTS.L has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IBTS.L trades at $95.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IBTS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs SEML.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, SEML.L has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while SEML.L trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to SEML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IBGX.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IBGX.L has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IBGX.L trades at $136.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IBGX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs DTLA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, DTLA.L has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while DTLA.L trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is less volatile compared to DTLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IHYA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IHYA.L has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IHYA.L trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYA.L's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IHYA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XGSG.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XGSG.L has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XGSG.L trades at $2,388.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to XGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs MDBG.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, MDBG.L has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while MDBG.L trades at $1,031.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to MDBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XT01.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XT01.L has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XT01.L trades at $45.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to XT01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VCPA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VCPA.L has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VCPA.L trades at $43.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VCPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs 0GGH.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, 0GGH.L has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while 0GGH.L trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GGH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GGH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to 0GGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs AGGG.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, AGGG.L has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while AGGG.L trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to AGGG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IBGS.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IBGS.L has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IBGS.L trades at $119.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IBGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XHYG.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XHYG.L has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XHYG.L trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to XHYG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VAGS.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VAGS.L has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VAGS.L trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VAGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VSCA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VSCA.L has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VSCA.L trades at $44.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs SDIG.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, SDIG.L has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while SDIG.L trades at $100.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to SDIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs ERNA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, ERNA.L has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while ERNA.L trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to ERNA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs GCVB.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, GCVB.L has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while GCVB.L trades at $52.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCVB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCVB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to GCVB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs ERNS.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, ERNS.L has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while ERNS.L trades at $102.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to ERNS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs CORP.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, CORP.L has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while CORP.L trades at $88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to CORP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs EMSA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, EMSA.L has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while EMSA.L trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to EMSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IDTL.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IDTL.L has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IDTL.L trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IDTL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs CRHG.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, CRHG.L has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while CRHG.L trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRHG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to CRHG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs EMDL.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, EMDL.L has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while EMDL.L trades at $42.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMDL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMDL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to EMDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs EMCA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, EMCA.L has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while EMCA.L trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to EMCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs V3GU.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, V3GU.L has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while V3GU.L trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3GU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3GU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to V3GU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XZE5.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XZE5.L has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XZE5.L trades at $39.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZE5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZE5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to XZE5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VDET.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VDET.L has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VDET.L trades at $42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VDET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VDEA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VDEA.L has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VDEA.L trades at $57.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VDEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs XDGU.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, XDGU.L has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while XDGU.L trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to XDGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IBCI.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IBCI.L has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IBCI.L trades at $193.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IBCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs AT1.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, AT1.L has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while AT1.L trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to AT1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VUTA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VUTA.L has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VUTA.L trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VUTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs CRPS.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, CRPS.L has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while CRPS.L trades at $65.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to CRPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IGLO.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IGLO.L has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IGLO.L trades at $90.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IGLO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs EEXF.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, EEXF.L has a market cap of 986.15M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while EEXF.L trades at $92.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEXF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEXF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to EEXF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IBTL.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IBTL.L has a market cap of 981.31M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IBTL.L trades at $236.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IBTL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IUAG.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IUAG.L has a market cap of 964.37M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IUAG.L trades at $91.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IUAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VEMT.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VEMT.L has a market cap of 911.46M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VEMT.L trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VEMT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs VEMA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, VEMA.L has a market cap of 909.71M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while VEMA.L trades at $43.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to VEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs HYLD.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, HYLD.L has a market cap of 886.80M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while HYLD.L trades at $88.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLD.L's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to HYLD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs EFRN.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, EFRN.L has a market cap of 877.76M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while EFRN.L trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFRN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFRN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to EFRN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs IGTM.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, IGTM.L has a market cap of 875.33M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while IGTM.L trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to IGTM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs SDHA.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, SDHA.L has a market cap of 865.26M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while SDHA.L trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHA.L's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to SDHA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs BBM3.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, BBM3.L has a market cap of 836.68M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while BBM3.L trades at $84.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBM3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBM3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is more volatile compared to BBM3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.
STHS.L vs SDHY.L Comparison
STHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STHS.L stands at 27.87M. In comparison, SDHY.L has a market cap of 776.99M. Regarding current trading prices, STHS.L is priced at $8.85, while SDHY.L trades at $88.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY.L's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, STHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STHS.L is less volatile compared to SDHY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STHS.L.