Star Alliance International Corp.
Star Alliance International Corp. STAL Peers
See (STAL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STAL | $0.00 | -50.00% | 285566.00 | -0.03 | -$0.01 | N/A |
ZIJMF | $2.27 | -2.58% | 64.68B | 14.19 | $0.16 | +1.81% |
OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.45B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
GFIOF | $23.13 | N/A | 20.70B | 16.76 | $1.38 | +2.36% |
NESRF | $12.00 | +2.56% | 17.15B | 23.08 | $0.52 | +1.76% |
NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.26B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.43% |
HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 13.96B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.94B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.59B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
KOZAY | $3.55 | -42.70% | 11.37B | 6.96 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STAL vs ZIJMF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 64.68B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs OPYGY Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs GFIOF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 20.70B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while GFIOF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs NESRF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.15B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while NESRF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs NSTYY Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs HCHDY Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs NCMGY Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs NCMGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.59B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs KOZAY Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs CAHPF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.25B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while CAHPF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs HGMCF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while HGMCF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs LUGDF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 9.67B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while LUGDF trades at $40.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs ZHAOF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs AULGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs EDVMF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 6.67B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while EDVMF trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -65.73. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs DGMLF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs ARGTF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ARGTF trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -148.90. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs SBYSF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while SBYSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs ZIJMY Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMY trades at $45.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs PMNXF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while PMNXF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs OCANF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while OCANF trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs TORXF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while TORXF trades at $29.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs CRNLF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while CRNLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and CRNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs DPMLF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while DPMLF trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs GSISF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs CELTF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs KNTNF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while KNTNF trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs ELKMF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ELKMF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and ELKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs GRLGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while GRLGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs RGRNF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while RGRNF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs REDLF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while REDLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs RMLRF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while RMLRF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and RMLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs HCHDF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while HCHDF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs EOGSF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs CXBMF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while CXBMF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs WDOFF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while WDOFF trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs WFRSF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while WFRSF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and WFRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs ORAAF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ORAAF trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -44.62. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and ORAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs DRDGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while DRDGF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs PAFRF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs OBNNF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs AURQF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs MAUTF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 967.53M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while MAUTF trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs SVLKF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.83M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs BELGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 918.81M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while BELGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and BELGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs SGSVF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.06M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs KRRGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.91M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs SNWGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 822.39M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while SNWGF trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -36.57. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs MWSNF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 815.27M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while MWSNF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is 182.95. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs RUPRF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 794.87M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while RUPRF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -169.81. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs RMGGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 740.06M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while RMGGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -34.76. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and RMGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs WTGRF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.28M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs RGDFF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.83M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs PDIYF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 655.09M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while PDIYF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs GUYGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 517.05M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while GUYGF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -71.67. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs NVMLF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.17M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs ARNGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.73M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs MNSAF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 434.62M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while MNSAF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and MNSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs ECRTF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 412.13M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ECRTF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs KSKGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.25M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs ORZCF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 392.57M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ORZCF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs ASGOF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 375.82M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ASGOF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs LMGDF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 355.54M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while LMGDF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs TPRXF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.46M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs MNDJF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 328.48M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while MNDJF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs RSRBF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 321.75M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while RSRBF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -31.86. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and RSRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs RIOFF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 317.73M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while RIOFF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is -14.96. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs RMLFF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 298.87M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while RMLFF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -12.12. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs PROBF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 297.78M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while PROBF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.60. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs ALKEF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 286.24M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ALKEF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and ALKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs THXPF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 282.87M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while THXPF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs FDMIF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 281.48M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while FDMIF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -32.89. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs MGDPF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.68M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs OGNRF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 264.16M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while OGNRF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 131.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs OSIIF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.63M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs ERRSF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.91M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs TTTNF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, TTTNF has a market cap of 250.28M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while TTTNF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TTTNF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to TTTNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to TTTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs MAKOF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 249.78M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while MAKOF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs ELEMF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 244.53M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while ELEMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs WRLGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 196.55M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while WRLGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs SAAGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.88M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs CNLMF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.34M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs HSTXF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 190.97M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while HSTXF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs OMGGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 183.29M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while OMGGF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -31.07. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs DCCNF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.52M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs JAGGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 181.98M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while JAGGF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -114.72. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs SRBIF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 178.28M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while SRBIF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and SRBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs CNMXF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 176.40M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs STBMF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 169.68M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while STBMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and STBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs GDRZF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 168.26M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while GDRZF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and GDRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs THSGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 165.88M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while THSGF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs KFFLF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 159.62M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while KFFLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs EEYMF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.25M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and EEYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs STPGF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 153.14M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while STPGF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs GGAZF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 152.18M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while GGAZF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs AGXKF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.94M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs DNGDF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 142.67M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while DNGDF trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.
STAL vs NVOOF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.65M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL and NVOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAL vs MAIFF Comparison
STAL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAL stands at 285566.00. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 131.29M. Regarding current trading prices, STAL is priced at $0.00, while MAIFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, STAL's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, STAL is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAL.