Salt Lake Potash Limited

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 91.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while BHP.L trades at $1,809.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 88.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0L5V.L trades at $354.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 51.41. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 82.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0R2J.L trades at $162.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 69.47. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 75.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while RIO.L trades at $4,445.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 73.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0L8B.L trades at $88.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 72.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0IFA.L trades at $255.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 66.64. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 60.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0HBH.L trades at $270.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0Z4C.L trades at $231.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 30.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while GLEN.L trades at $252.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -25.28. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 27.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0NHS.L trades at $54.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 26.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0K9L.L trades at $116.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 24.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while AAL.L trades at $2,045.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 24.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0KEI.L trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 17.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0EDD.L trades at $57.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 15.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UGS.L trades at $37.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -88.85. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 13.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0HQU.L trades at $81.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 13.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0R07.L trades at $36.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 11.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0KXS.L trades at $179.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 10.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0LVK.L trades at $81.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 10.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0K3B.L trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0LJ9.L trades at $41.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0IF3.L trades at $78.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0U6C.L trades at $31.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0HCB.L trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 6.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0HC7.L trades at $57.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while S32.L trades at $135.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0QYN.L trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0HUR.L trades at $51.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0VBE.L trades at $23.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -154.40. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0IK3.L trades at $36.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0I0H.L trades at $7.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0AHJ.L trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -17.47. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0VL5.L trades at $44.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0R0U.L trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -65.66. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0VGM.L trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 58.08. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0L45.L trades at $55.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0VGE.L trades at $14.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0R0A.L trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 163.93. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0TWH.L trades at $10.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SO4.L has daily volatility of 28.40 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0VOA.L trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0QYM.L trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0VHI.L trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0KW8.L trades at $21.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0HWG.L trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0NZN.L trades at $811.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0R2C.L trades at $4.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 46.37. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0R11.L trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0QZ2.L trades at $5.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 670.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0G5B.L trades at $120.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 661.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ADT1.L trades at $191.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -12.77. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 520.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0O6D.L trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 431.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0KD1.L trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -37.48. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 397.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0JZT.L trades at $7.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -53.44. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 385.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0VIK.L trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 348.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while KMR.L trades at $394.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 318.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while GFM.L trades at $173.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 221.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UYN.L trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 214.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while SOLG.L trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 197.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while SVML.L trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 190.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0R20.L trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -12.16. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 170.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0P07.L trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while BSE.L trades at $12.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 146.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0RRC.L trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while TRR.L trades at $48.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 140.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while CAPD.L trades at $71.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 136.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ECOR.L trades at $55.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -18.33. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 136.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0V46.L trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 130.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while KP2.L trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 127.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0VNO.L trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 98.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while SAV.L trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 97.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while JLP.L trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 91.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while CUSN.L trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 81.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while PRE.L trades at $27.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 74.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while RBW.L trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UIK.L trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 69.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while KOD.L trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 68.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0IYS.L trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0R0D.L trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 64.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0QQR.L trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 61.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0QVG.L trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 54.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while MKA.L trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 52.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while HE1.L trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while AFRK.L trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 51.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ATM.L trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 49.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ALL.L trades at $7.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0ICI.L trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UYO.L trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 36.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0QPH.L trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 53.52. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 32.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while FAR.L trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FOX.L has a market cap of 30.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while FOX.L trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FOX.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FOX.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to FOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while NMT.L trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 28.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ZNWD.L trades at $6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 28.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ARS.L trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 25.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 1SN.L trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EMH.L has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while EMH.L trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EMH.L's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMH.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to EMH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 22.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while KAV.L trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while GSP.L trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ARCM.L has a market cap of 20.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ARCM.L trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ARCM.L's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARCM.L's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ARCM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V7X.L has a market cap of 20.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0V7X.L trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0V7X.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0V7X.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0V7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RMR.L has a market cap of 16.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while RMR.L trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RMR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RMR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to RMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PREM.L has a market cap of 16.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while PREM.L trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PREM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PREM.L's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to PREM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MTR.L has a market cap of 15.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while MTR.L trades at $9.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MTR.L's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTR.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to MTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UVX.L has a market cap of 15.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UVX.L trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UVX.L's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UVX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UVX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, POW.L has a market cap of 13.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while POW.L trades at $12.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas POW.L's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to POW.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to POW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 13.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while MET1.L trades at $29.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LND.L has a market cap of 13.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while LND.L trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LND.L's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LND.L's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to LND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, VAST.L has a market cap of 12.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while VAST.L trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VAST.L's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VAST.L's ROE of +9.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to VAST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 80M.L has a market cap of 11.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 80M.L trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 80M.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 80M.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 80M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CRCL.L has a market cap of 11.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while CRCL.L trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CRCL.L's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRCL.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to CRCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UXL.L has a market cap of 10.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UXL.L trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UXL.L's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UXL.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UXL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0URM.L has a market cap of 10.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0URM.L trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0URM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0URM.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0URM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UX6.L has a market cap of 9.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UX6.L trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UX6.L's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UX6.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CLA.L has a market cap of 9.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while CLA.L trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to CLA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GLR.L has a market cap of 9.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while GLR.L trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GLR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLR.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to GLR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PXC.L has a market cap of 9.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while PXC.L trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PXC.L's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PXC.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to PXC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CMET.L has a market cap of 9.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while CMET.L trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CMET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMET.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to CMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BRES.L has a market cap of 9.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while BRES.L trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRES.L's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BRES.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to BRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RMM.L has a market cap of 8.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while RMM.L trades at $5.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RMM.L's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RMM.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to RMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TGR.L has a market cap of 8.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while TGR.L trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TGR.L's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TGR.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to TGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QQJ.L has a market cap of 8.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0QQJ.L trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0QQJ.L's P/E ratio is -24.57. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0QQJ.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0QQJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ARV.L has a market cap of 8.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ARV.L trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ARV.L's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARV.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ARV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UY6.L has a market cap of 8.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UY6.L trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UY6.L's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UY6.L's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UY6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GROC.L has a market cap of 7.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while GROC.L trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GROC.L's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GROC.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to GROC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CTL.L has a market cap of 7.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while CTL.L trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CTL.L's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTL.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to CTL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FRG.L has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while FRG.L trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FRG.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FRG.L's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to FRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V4O.L has a market cap of 7.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0V4O.L trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0V4O.L's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0V4O.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0V4O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BMN.L has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while BMN.L trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BMN.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMN.L's ROE of -259.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to BMN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PYX.L has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while PYX.L trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PYX.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PYX.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to PYX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MNRG.L has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while MNRG.L trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MNRG.L's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MNRG.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to MNRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RH8.L has a market cap of 6.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0RH8.L trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0RH8.L's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0RH8.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0RH8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TUN.L has a market cap of 6.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while TUN.L trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TUN.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TUN.L's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to TUN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SML.L has a market cap of 6.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while SML.L trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SML.L's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to SML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BMV.L has a market cap of 5.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while BMV.L trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMV.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to BMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IRON.L has a market cap of 5.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while IRON.L trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IRON.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IRON.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to IRON.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KDNC.L has a market cap of 5.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while KDNC.L trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KDNC.L's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KDNC.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to KDNC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, THR.L has a market cap of 5.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while THR.L trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas THR.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to THR.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to THR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P3V.L has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0P3V.L trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0P3V.L's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0P3V.L's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0P3V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JAY.L has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while JAY.L trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JAY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JAY.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to JAY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BEM.L has a market cap of 4.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while BEM.L trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BEM.L's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BEM.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to BEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ATN.L has a market cap of 4.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ATN.L trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ATN.L's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATN.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ATN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BZT.L has a market cap of 4.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while BZT.L trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BZT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BZT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to BZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AYM.L has a market cap of 4.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while AYM.L trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AYM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AYM.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to AYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BHL.L has a market cap of 4.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while BHL.L trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BHL.L's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHL.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to BHL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IMC.L has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while IMC.L trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IMC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IMC.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to IMC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0T9J.L has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0T9J.L trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0T9J.L's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0T9J.L's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0T9J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, WRES.L has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while WRES.L trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WRES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WRES.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to WRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ORM.L has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ORM.L trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ORM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ORM.L's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ORM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ALBA.L has a market cap of 3.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ALBA.L trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALBA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALBA.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ALBA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UFP.L has a market cap of 2.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UFP.L trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UFP.L's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UFP.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UFP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PFP.L has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while PFP.L trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PFP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PFP.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to PFP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FCM.L has a market cap of 2.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while FCM.L trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FCM.L's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FCM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to FCM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, REE.L has a market cap of 2.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while REE.L trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas REE.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to REE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to REE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IYU.L has a market cap of 2.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0IYU.L trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0IYU.L's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0IYU.L's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0IYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, URU.L has a market cap of 2.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while URU.L trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas URU.L's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to URU.L's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to URU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RRR.L has a market cap of 2.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while RRR.L trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RRR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RRR.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to RRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, UMR.L has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while UMR.L trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas UMR.L's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UMR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to UMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SKA.L has a market cap of 1.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while SKA.L trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SKA.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SKA.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to SKA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EUZ.L has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while EUZ.L trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EUZ.L's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EUZ.L's ROE of -193.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to EUZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AFP.L has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while AFP.L trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AFP.L's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AFP.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to AFP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TYM.L has a market cap of 1.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while TYM.L trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TYM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TYM.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to TYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TM1.L has a market cap of 1.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while TM1.L trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TM1.L's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TM1.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to TM1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CDL.L has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while CDL.L trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CDL.L's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is less volatile compared to CDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JAN.L has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while JAN.L trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JAN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JAN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to JAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ARK.L has a market cap of 1.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ARK.L trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ARK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARK.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ARK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KRS.L has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while KRS.L trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KRS.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to KRS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GWMO.L has a market cap of 900265.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while GWMO.L trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GWMO.L's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GWMO.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to GWMO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HZM.L has a market cap of 876782.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while HZM.L trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HZM.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HZM.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to HZM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SRES.L has a market cap of 816118.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while SRES.L trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SRES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SRES.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to SRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CHF.L has a market cap of 781968.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while CHF.L trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CHF.L's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHF.L's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to CHF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CRTM.L has a market cap of 657050.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while CRTM.L trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CRTM.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRTM.L's ROE of +28.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to CRTM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ACP.L has a market cap of 560115.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while ACP.L trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ACP.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ACP.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to ACP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KEN.L has a market cap of 513184.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while KEN.L trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KEN.L's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KEN.L's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to KEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AMC.L has a market cap of 8688.00. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while AMC.L trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AMC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMC.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to AMC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VDK.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0VDK.L trades at $9.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0VDK.L's P/E ratio is -36.04. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0VDK.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0VDK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MNOD.IL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while MNOD.IL trades at $9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MNOD.IL's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MNOD.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to MNOD.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0MFI.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0MFI.L trades at $34.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0MFI.L's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0MFI.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0MFI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BCN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while BCN.L trades at $67.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BCN.L's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BCN.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to BCN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IRR.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while IRR.L trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IRR.L's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IRR.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to IRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NSH.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while NSH.L trades at $175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NSH.L's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NSH.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to NSH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K69.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0K69.L trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0K69.L's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0K69.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0K69.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V38.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0V38.L trades at $49.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0V38.L's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0V38.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0V38.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0FSN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0FSN.L trades at $141.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0FSN.L's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0FSN.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0FSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.

SO4.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SO4.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UR5.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SO4.L is priced at $2.45, while 0UR5.L trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SO4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0UR5.L's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, SO4.L's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 0UR5.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SO4.L is more volatile compared to 0UR5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SO4.L.