Simba Essel Energy Inc.
Simba Essel Energy Inc. SMBZF Peers
See (SMBZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMBZF | $0.00 | N/A | 1.52M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEYYY | $7.00 | -18.89% | 175.45B | 4.76 | $1.47 | +4.00% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | N/A | 66.78B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $15.00 | +7.53% | 28.44B | 8.02 | $1.87 | +8.16% |
| TRMLF | $46.99 | +2.13% | 17.59B | 19.42 | $2.42 | +5.30% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | N/A | 16.99B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| IPXHY | $13.19 | +0.61% | 15.80B | 5.38 | $2.45 | +3.22% |
| PEXNY | $7.50 | -6.02% | 14.89B | 6.41 | $1.17 | +7.05% |
| IPXHF | $11.54 | N/A | 13.82B | 4.75 | $2.43 | +4.40% |
| SSLZY | $4.14 | +2.48% | 13.41B | 10.89 | $0.38 | +2.14% |
Stock Comparison
SMBZF vs MEYYY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 175.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs NSTKF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs WOPEF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 28.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while WOPEF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs TRMLF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while TRMLF trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs DETNF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs IPXHY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 15.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while IPXHY trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PEXNY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 14.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PEXNY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs IPXHF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 13.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while IPXHF trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs SSLZY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 13.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while SSLZY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs STOSF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 13.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while STOSF trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs AETUF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 12.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while AETUF trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs NOVKY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs SPGYF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while SPGYF trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PTRRY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PTRRY trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs VSOGF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while VSOGF trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs MEGEF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while MEGEF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs DKDRF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while DKDRF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PREKF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PREKF trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PMOIF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PMOIF trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs HBRIY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while HBRIY trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs DLKGF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while DLKGF trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs DELKY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while DELKY trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs OASPW Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PEYUF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PEYUF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs EERGF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while EERGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs BTEGF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs JPTXF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while JPTXF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs BEPTF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while BEPTF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PRMRF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PRMRF trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs NUVSF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while NUVSF trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs ATHOF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while ATHOF trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs BCHEY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while BCHEY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs IPCFF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while IPCFF trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PTGIF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PTGIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs FRHLF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while FRHLF trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs AAVVF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while AAVVF trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -62.23. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs BIREF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while BIREF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs EFVIF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs DTNOF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while DTNOF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs CRCQW Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs WLLAW Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs CDDRF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while CDDRF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs KWTEF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 970.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while KWTEF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs KELTF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 962.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while KELTF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs AOIFF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 944.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while AOIFF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PARXF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 911.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PARXF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs UNEGF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs CWEGF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs BWEFF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 807.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while BWEFF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs KRNGF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 742.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while KRNGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs CRLFF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 729.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while CRLFF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs SQZZF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 687.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while SQZZF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs AAGEF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs GFKSY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs RCKHF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 469.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while RCKHF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs GUKYF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 442.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while GUKYF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs DALXF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 438.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while DALXF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs TBNRF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PTALF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 400.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PTALF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PTHRF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 386.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PTHRF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs BKBEF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs SHASF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 383.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while SHASF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs KRNGY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 382.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while KRNGY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs ZPTAF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 382.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while ZPTAF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs COPJF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 371.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while COPJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PRYGF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PEGIY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs ATUUF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 332.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while ATUUF trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -37.66. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs CEIEF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 327.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while CEIEF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -61.63. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs FECCF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 322.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while FECCF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs ENQUF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs TUWLF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 292.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while TUWLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PESAF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 282.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PESAF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs GEGYY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 242.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while GEGYY trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs OILSF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 242.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while OILSF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs GEGYF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 233.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while GEGYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs TUWOY Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 228.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while TUWOY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs EXCE Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 215.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while EXCE trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs ZNOG Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 213.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while ZNOG trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -19.40. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs ITEEF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs CRNZF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs HZNFF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 195.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while HZNFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PSHIF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs HRCXF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 183.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs GASXF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 177.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while GASXF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs RECWF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs IPOOF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 166.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while IPOOF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs ALVOF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 157.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while ALVOF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PNWRF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs KGEIF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 154.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs PIFYF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 150.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while PIFYF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs CVONF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 143.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while CVONF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs SEUSF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 142.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while SEUSF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -18.93. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs SLGYF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 134.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs STGAF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, STGAF has a market cap of 126.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while STGAF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGAF's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to STGAF's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to STGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs LNDNF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 125.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while LNDNF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs HMENF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, HMENF has a market cap of 122.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while HMENF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HMENF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to HMENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs RUBLF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 122.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while RUBLF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.
SMBZF vs SOCLF Comparison
SMBZF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMBZF stands at 1.52M. In comparison, SOCLF has a market cap of 119.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SMBZF is priced at $0.00, while SOCLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMBZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOCLF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, SMBZF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SOCLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMBZF is more volatile compared to SOCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMBZF.