San Leon Energy plc
San Leon Energy plc SLGYF Peers
See (SLGYF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLGYF | $0.30 | N/A | 134.97M | 6.00 | $0.05 | N/A |
| MEYYY | $7.00 | -18.89% | 175.45B | 4.76 | $1.47 | +4.00% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | N/A | 66.78B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $13.75 | -1.79% | 26.07B | 7.35 | $1.87 | +8.91% |
| TRMLF | $46.38 | +4.46% | 17.36B | 19.17 | $2.42 | +5.46% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | N/A | 16.99B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| PEXNY | $7.98 | N/A | 15.84B | 6.88 | $1.16 | +6.63% |
| IPXHY | $12.99 | -0.08% | 15.56B | 5.35 | $2.43 | +3.27% |
| IPXHF | $11.54 | -19.07% | 13.82B | 4.75 | $2.43 | +4.40% |
| STOSF | $4.25 | N/A | 13.77B | 11.18 | $0.38 | +5.52% |
Stock Comparison
SLGYF vs MEYYY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 175.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs NSTKF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and NSTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs WOPEF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 26.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while WOPEF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs TRMLF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while TRMLF trades at $46.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs DETNF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and DETNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs PEXNY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PEXNY trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and PEXNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs IPXHY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 15.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while IPXHY trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs IPXHF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 13.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while IPXHF trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs STOSF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 13.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while STOSF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs SSLZY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 13.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while SSLZY trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs AETUF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 12.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while AETUF trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs NOVKY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and NOVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs SPGYF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 7.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while SPGYF trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PTRRY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 5.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PTRRY trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs VSOGF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while VSOGF trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and VSOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs DKDRF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while DKDRF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs MEGEF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while MEGEF trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PREKF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PREKF trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs HBRIY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while HBRIY trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -23.10. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and HBRIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs PMOIF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PMOIF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs DLKGF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while DLKGF trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs DELKY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while DELKY trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs OASPW Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and OASPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs PEYUF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PEYUF trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs EERGF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while EERGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and EERGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs BTEGF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and BTEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs JPTXF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while JPTXF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs NUVSF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while NUVSF trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs BEPTF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while BEPTF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PRMRF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PRMRF trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs ATHOF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while ATHOF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs BCHEY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while BCHEY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PTGIF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PTGIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs FRHLF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while FRHLF trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs IPCFF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while IPCFF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs AAVVF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while AAVVF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -59.23. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs BIREF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while BIREF trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs EFVIF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and EFVIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs CRCQW Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs WLLAW Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs DTNOF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while DTNOF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs CDDRF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while CDDRF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs KWTEF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 988.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while KWTEF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs KELTF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 959.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while KELTF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs AOIFF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 931.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while AOIFF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PARXF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 911.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PARXF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs UNEGF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs CWEGF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs BWEFF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 807.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while BWEFF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs KRNGF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 742.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while KRNGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs CRLFF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 715.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while CRLFF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs SQZZF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 707.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while SQZZF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and SQZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs AAGEF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and AAGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs GFKSY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and GFKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs RCKHF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 462.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while RCKHF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs GUKYF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 442.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while GUKYF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs DALXF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 419.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while DALXF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs TBNRF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and TBNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs PTHRF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 413.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PTHRF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -36.16. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs SHASF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 398.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while SHASF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PTALF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 384.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PTALF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs BKBEF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs KRNGY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 381.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while KRNGY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs ZPTAF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 381.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while ZPTAF trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -13.19. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs COPJF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 371.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while COPJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PRYGF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and PRYGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs PEGIY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs CEIEF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 319.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while CEIEF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -60.21. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and CEIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs ATUUF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 317.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while ATUUF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -35.93. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs ENQUF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and ENQUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs TUWLF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 292.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while TUWLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and TUWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs PESAF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 282.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PESAF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and PESAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs FECCF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 266.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while FECCF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs TUWOY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 243.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while TUWOY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs GEGYY Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 242.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while GEGYY trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs OILSF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 236.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while OILSF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs GEGYF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 233.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while GEGYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and GEGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs EXCE Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 216.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while EXCE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs ZNOG Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 204.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while ZNOG trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs ITEEF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs CRNZF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs HZNFF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 195.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while HZNFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and HZNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs PSHIF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs HRCXF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 183.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and HRCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs GASXF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 176.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while GASXF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs RECWF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and RECWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs IPOOF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 159.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while IPOOF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs SEUSF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 157.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while SEUSF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -21.04. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs EEGUF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 157.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while EEGUF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF and EEGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SLGYF vs ALVOF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 157.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while ALVOF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PNWRF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs KGEIF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 154.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PIFYF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 146.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PIFYF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs CVONF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 143.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while CVONF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs LNDNF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 125.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while LNDNF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs HMENF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, HMENF has a market cap of 119.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while HMENF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HMENF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HMENF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to HMENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs SOCLF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, SOCLF has a market cap of 119.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while SOCLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SOCLF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SOCLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to SOCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs RECAF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, RECAF has a market cap of 119.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while RECAF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas RECAF's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RECAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to RECAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.
SLGYF vs PTRUF Comparison
SLGYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLGYF stands at 134.97M. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 119.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SLGYF is priced at $0.30, while PTRUF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLGYF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, SLGYF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLGYF is less volatile compared to PTRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLGYF.