Smurfit Kappa Group Plc

SK3.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SK3.IR stands at 10.82B. In comparison, VRLA.PA has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SK3.IR is priced at $41.44, while VRLA.PA trades at $27.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SK3.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.24, whereas VRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, SK3.IR's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VRLA.PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SK3.IR is more volatile compared to VRLA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SK3.IR.

SK3.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SK3.IR stands at 10.82B. In comparison, ALGIL.PA has a market cap of 550.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SK3.IR is priced at $41.44, while ALGIL.PA trades at $29.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SK3.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.24, whereas ALGIL.PA's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, SK3.IR's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALGIL.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SK3.IR is more volatile compared to ALGIL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SK3.IR.

SK3.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SK3.IR stands at 10.82B. In comparison, TFF.PA has a market cap of 535.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SK3.IR is priced at $41.44, while TFF.PA trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SK3.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.24, whereas TFF.PA's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, SK3.IR's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TFF.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SK3.IR is less volatile compared to TFF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SK3.IR.

SK3.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SK3.IR stands at 10.82B. In comparison, ALBI.PA has a market cap of 85.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SK3.IR is priced at $41.44, while ALBI.PA trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SK3.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.24, whereas ALBI.PA's P/E ratio is -113.00. In terms of profitability, SK3.IR's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALBI.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SK3.IR is more volatile compared to ALBI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SK3.IR.

SK3.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SK3.IR stands at 10.82B. In comparison, ALQP.PA has a market cap of 69.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SK3.IR is priced at $41.44, while ALQP.PA trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SK3.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.24, whereas ALQP.PA's P/E ratio is -59.26. In terms of profitability, SK3.IR's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALQP.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SK3.IR is less volatile compared to ALQP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SK3.IR.

SK3.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SK3.IR stands at 10.82B. In comparison, CABKA.AS has a market cap of 49.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SK3.IR is priced at $41.44, while CABKA.AS trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SK3.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.24, whereas CABKA.AS's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, SK3.IR's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CABKA.AS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SK3.IR is more volatile compared to CABKA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SK3.IR.

SK3.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SK3.IR stands at 10.82B. In comparison, AUGR.PA has a market cap of 9.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SK3.IR is priced at $41.44, while AUGR.PA trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SK3.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.24, whereas AUGR.PA's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, SK3.IR's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUGR.PA's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SK3.IR is more volatile compared to AUGR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SK3.IR.

SK3.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SK3.IR stands at 10.82B. In comparison, RES.BR has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, SK3.IR is priced at $41.44, while RES.BR trades at $234.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SK3.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.24, whereas RES.BR's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, SK3.IR's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RES.BR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SK3.IR is more volatile compared to RES.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SK3.IR.

SK3.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SK3.IR stands at 10.82B. In comparison, PSB.PA has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, SK3.IR is priced at $41.44, while PSB.PA trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SK3.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.24, whereas PSB.PA's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, SK3.IR's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSB.PA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SK3.IR is more volatile compared to PSB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SK3.IR.