Sokoman Minerals Corp.
Sokoman Minerals Corp. SICNF Peers
See (SICNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
SICNF vs ZIJMF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 62.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ZIJMF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs OPYGY Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs GFIOF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 20.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while GFIOF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs NESRF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while NESRF trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs NSTYY Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs HCHDY Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs NCMGY Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs NCMGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs KOZAY Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs CAHPF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while CAHPF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs HGMCF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while HGMCF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs LUGDF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 9.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while LUGDF trades at $40.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ZHAOF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs AULGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs EDVMF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 6.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while EDVMF trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -66.40. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs DGMLF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ARGTF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ARGTF trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -135.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs SBYSF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while SBYSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ZIJMY Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ZIJMY trades at $44.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs PMNXF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while PMNXF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs OCANF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while OCANF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs TORXF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while TORXF trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs CRNLF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while CRNLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs DPMLF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while DPMLF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ELKMF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ELKMF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs GSISF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs CELTF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs KNTNF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while KNTNF trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs GRLGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while GRLGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -16.44. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs RMLRF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while RMLRF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs RGRNF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while RGRNF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs REDLF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while REDLF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs HCHDF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while HCHDF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs EOGSF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs CXBMF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while CXBMF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs WDOFF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while WDOFF trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs WFRSF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while WFRSF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs DRDGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while DRDGF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ORAAF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ORAAF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs PAFRF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs OBNNF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs AURQF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs MAUTF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 936.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while MAUTF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs SVLKF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs BELGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 918.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while BELGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs SNWGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 905.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while SNWGF trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -40.29. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs SGSVF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs KRRGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs MWSNF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 822.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while MWSNF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -73.80. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs RUPRF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 782.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while RUPRF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -167.25. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs RMGGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 721.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while RMGGF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -33.89. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs WTGRF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs RGDFF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs PDIYF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 668.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while PDIYF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs GUYGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 517.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while GUYGF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -71.67. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs NVMLF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ARNGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs MNSAF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 434.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while MNSAF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs KSKGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ASGOF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 404.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ASGOF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ORZCF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 400.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ORZCF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ECRTF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 384.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ECRTF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs LMGDF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 354.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while LMGDF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs TPRXF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs MNDJF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 334.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while MNDJF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs RSRBF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 315.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while RSRBF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -31.29. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs RIOFF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 315.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while RIOFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs RMLFF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 311.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while RMLFF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ALKEF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 308.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ALKEF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs PROBF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 302.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while PROBF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.84. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs THXPF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 296.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while THXPF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs FDMIF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 293.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while FDMIF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -34.33. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs MGDPF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs OGNRF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 266.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while OGNRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs MAKOF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 255.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while MAKOF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs OSIIF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ERRSF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs TTTNF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, TTTNF has a market cap of 250.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while TTTNF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas TTTNF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TTTNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to TTTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs ELEMF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 242.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while ELEMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 98.50. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs SAAGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs CNLMF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs SRBIF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 187.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while SRBIF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs WRLGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 182.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while WRLGF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs DCCNF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs JAGGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 182.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while JAGGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs HSTXF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 181.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while HSTXF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs CNMXF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 176.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs OMGGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 176.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while OMGGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -29.89. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs GDRZF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 175.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while GDRZF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs STBMF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 173.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while STBMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs THSGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 163.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while THSGF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs KFFLF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 159.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while KFFLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs STPGF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 156.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while STPGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs EEYMF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs AGXKF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs DNGDF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 143.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while DNGDF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs NVOOF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs MAIFF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 135.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while MAIFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is more volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
SICNF vs GGAZF Comparison
SICNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SICNF stands at 11.44M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 134.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SICNF is priced at $0.03, while GGAZF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SICNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.72, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -24.13. In terms of profitability, SICNF's ROE is -0.62%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SICNF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SICNF.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SICNF | $0.03 | N/A | 11.44M | -1.72 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.20 | +0.92% | 62.51B | 12.22 | $0.18 | +1.92% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.45B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $23.13 | N/A | 20.70B | 16.76 | $1.38 | +2.36% |
| NESRF | $12.20 | -4.69% | 17.44B | 23.02 | $0.53 | +1.70% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.26B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 13.96B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.94B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.59B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| KOZAY | $3.55 | -42.70% | 11.37B | 6.96 | $0.51 | N/A |