Sabre Gold Mines Corp.
Sabre Gold Mines Corp. SGLDD Peers
See (SGLDD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGLDD | $0.12 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.21 | -2.54% | 63.03B | 11.64 | $0.19 | +1.91% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.45B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $21.01 | -9.17% | 18.80B | 15.22 | $1.38 | +2.60% |
| NESRF | $12.25 | +2.08% | 17.51B | 23.56 | $0.52 | +1.71% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.26B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.43% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 13.96B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.94B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.59B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| KOZAY | $3.55 | -42.70% | 11.37B | 6.96 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SGLDD vs ZIJMF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 63.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ZIJMF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs OPYGY Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs GFIOF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 18.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while GFIOF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs NESRF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while NESRF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs NSTYY Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs HCHDY Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs NCMGY Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs NCMGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs KOZAY Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs CAHPF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while CAHPF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs HGMCF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while HGMCF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs LUGDF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while LUGDF trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs ZHAOF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs AULGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs EDVMF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while EDVMF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -65.24. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs DGMLF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs SBYSF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while SBYSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs ARGTF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ARGTF trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -203.71. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs ZIJMY Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ZIJMY trades at $44.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs PMNXF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while PMNXF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs OCANF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while OCANF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs TORXF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while TORXF trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs CRNLF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while CRNLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs DPMLF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while DPMLF trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs GSISF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs CELTF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs ELKMF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ELKMF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and ELKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs KNTNF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while KNTNF trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs GRLGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while GRLGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -16.10. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs RGRNF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while RGRNF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs REDLF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while REDLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs RMLRF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while RMLRF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs EOGSF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs HCHDF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while HCHDF trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs WDOFF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while WDOFF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs CXBMF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while CXBMF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs WFRSF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while WFRSF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and WFRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs ORAAF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ORAAF trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs DRDGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while DRDGF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs PAFRF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs OBNNF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs AURQF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs MAUTF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 978.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while MAUTF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs SVLKF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs BELGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 918.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while BELGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs MWSNF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 886.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while MWSNF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -72.80. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs SGSVF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs KRRGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs SNWGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 822.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while SNWGF trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -36.57. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs RUPRF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 800.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while RUPRF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -171.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs RMGGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 745.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while RMGGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs WTGRF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs RGDFF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs PDIYF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 613.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while PDIYF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -23.41. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and PDIYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs GUYGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 528.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while GUYGF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -73.22. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs NVMLF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs ARNGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs MNSAF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 434.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while MNSAF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs ECRTF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 412.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ECRTF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs KSKGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs ORZCF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 387.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ORZCF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs ASGOF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 378.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ASGOF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs LMGDF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 357.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while LMGDF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs TPRXF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs MNDJF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 326.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while MNDJF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs RSRBF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 321.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while RSRBF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -31.86. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and RSRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs THXPF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 306.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while THXPF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs RIOFF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 304.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while RIOFF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is -14.34. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs PROBF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 293.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while PROBF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs RMLFF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 292.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while RMLFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and RMLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs ALKEF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 284.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ALKEF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs MGDPF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs FDMIF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 273.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while FDMIF trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs OGNRF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 261.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while OGNRF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 129.90. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs OSIIF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs ERRSF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs TTTNF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, TTTNF has a market cap of 250.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while TTTNF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTTNF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to TTTNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to TTTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs ELEMF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 246.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while ELEMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 100.48. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs MAKOF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 246.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while MAKOF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs STBMF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 199.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while STBMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and STBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs WRLGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 195.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while WRLGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs SAAGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs CNLMF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs HSTXF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 192.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while HSTXF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs DCCNF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs OMGGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 179.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while OMGGF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs JAGGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 176.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while JAGGF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -27.87. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs CNMXF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 176.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs SRBIF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 174.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while SRBIF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs GDRZF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 169.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while GDRZF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs THSGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 163.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while THSGF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs KFFLF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 159.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while KFFLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs EEYMF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and EEYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs STPGF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 152.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while STPGF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs AGXKF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs GGAZF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 151.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while GGAZF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs NVOOF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD and NVOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGLDD vs DNGDF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 140.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while DNGDF trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.
SGLDD vs MAIFF Comparison
SGLDD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLDD stands at N/A. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 130.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLDD is priced at $0.12, while MAIFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLDD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, SGLDD's ROE is N/A, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLDD is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLDD.