Safestore Holdings plc
Safestore Holdings plc SFSHF Peers
See (SFSHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFSHF | $8.12 | N/A | 1.77B | 3.59 | $2.26 | +4.82% |
| PLDGP | $56.00 | +0.90% | 42.82B | 11.21 | $5.00 | +3.56% |
| SEGXF | $9.00 | -5.26% | 12.17B | 15.25 | $0.59 | +3.16% |
| FNCDY | $14.74 | -4.72% | 6.53B | 81.89 | $0.18 | +6.45% |
| FBBPF | $3.50 | +1.98% | 5.63B | 5.23 | $0.67 | +0.22% |
| WDPSF | $23.82 | +0.76% | 5.38B | 11.13 | $2.14 | +5.11% |
| MAPGF | $0.91 | N/A | 4.60B | 30.23 | $0.03 | +6.68% |
| NPONF | $1,408.91 | N/A | 4.53B | 23.81 | $59.17 | +2.43% |
| MAPIF | $1.47 | N/A | 4.19B | 16.33 | $0.09 | +6.98% |
| CGIUF | $0.19 | N/A | 2.65B | -1.27 | -$0.15 | +57.85% |
Stock Comparison
SFSHF vs PLDGP Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, PLDGP has a market cap of 42.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while PLDGP trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas PLDGP's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLDGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to PLDGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs SEGXF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, SEGXF has a market cap of 12.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while SEGXF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas SEGXF's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEGXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to SEGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs FNCDY Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, FNCDY has a market cap of 6.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while FNCDY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FNCDY's P/E ratio is 81.89. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNCDY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to FNCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs FBBPF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, FBBPF has a market cap of 5.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while FBBPF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FBBPF's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBBPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to FBBPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs WDPSF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, WDPSF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while WDPSF trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas WDPSF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDPSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to WDPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs MAPGF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, MAPGF has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while MAPGF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas MAPGF's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAPGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to MAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs NPONF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, NPONF has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while NPONF trades at $1,408.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas NPONF's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is less volatile compared to NPONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs MAPIF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, MAPIF has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while MAPIF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas MAPIF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAPIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to MAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs CGIUF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, CGIUF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while CGIUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CGIUF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGIUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is less volatile compared to CGIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs BYLOF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, BYLOF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while BYLOF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BYLOF's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYLOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to BYLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs FRLOF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, FRLOF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while FRLOF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FRLOF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRLOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to FRLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs LXILF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, LXILF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while LXILF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas LXILF's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LXILF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to LXILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs BUNNF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, BUNNF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while BUNNF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BUNNF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BUNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to BUNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs DREUF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, DREUF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while DREUF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas DREUF's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DREUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to DREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs GRFFF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, GRFFF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while GRFFF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas GRFFF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to GRFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs CBAOF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, CBAOF has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while CBAOF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CBAOF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBAOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to CBAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs DBMBF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, DBMBF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while DBMBF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas DBMBF's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DBMBF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to DBMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs PCILF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, PCILF has a market cap of 908.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while PCILF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas PCILF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCILF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is less volatile compared to PCILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs EPCFF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, EPCFF has a market cap of 658.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while EPCFF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas EPCFF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EPCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to EPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs EFRTF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, EFRTF has a market cap of 366.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while EFRTF trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas EFRTF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFRTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to EFRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs SBBSF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, SBBSF has a market cap of 262.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while SBBSF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas SBBSF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBBSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to SBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs LVVP Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, LVVP has a market cap of 139.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while LVVP trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas LVVP's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LVVP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to LVVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs DOLHF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, DOLHF has a market cap of 69.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while DOLHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas DOLHF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOLHF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is less volatile compared to DOLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.
SFSHF vs RGGLF Comparison
SFSHF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFSHF stands at 1.77B. In comparison, RGGLF has a market cap of 29.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SFSHF is priced at $8.12, while RGGLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas RGGLF's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, SFSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RGGLF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFSHF is more volatile compared to RGGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFSHF.