Scient, Inc.
Scient, Inc. SCNTQ Peers
See (SCNTQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCNTQ | $0.00 | +6900.00% | 661.00 | N/A | -$2.17 | N/A |
| FJTSY | $22.78 | +0.57% | 40.67B | 29.58 | $0.77 | N/A |
| FJTSF | $22.55 | +0.47% | 40.08B | 29.29 | $0.77 | +0.84% |
| NTDTY | $27.40 | -0.08% | 38.42B | 39.71 | $0.69 | N/A |
| NTTDF | $24.89 | -9.16% | 34.90B | 36.07 | $0.69 | +0.35% |
| NIPNF | $25.02 | +9.28% | 33.35B | 28.12 | $0.89 | +0.74% |
| CAPMF | $169.20 | -0.77% | 28.76B | 16.11 | $10.50 | +2.18% |
| CGEMY | $33.82 | -1.02% | 28.74B | 15.95 | $2.12 | +2.16% |
| NURAF | $43.14 | +5.18% | 24.68B | 39.22 | $1.10 | +1.00% |
| NRILY | $41.25 | +1.28% | 23.60B | 37.50 | $1.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SCNTQ vs FJTSY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 40.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while FJTSY trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 29.58. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs FJTSF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 40.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while FJTSF trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NTDTY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 38.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NTDTY trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 39.71. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NTTDF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 34.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NTTDF trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NIPNF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 33.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NIPNF trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CAPMF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 28.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CAPMF trades at $169.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CGEMY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 28.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CGEMY trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NURAF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 24.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NURAF trades at $43.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NRILY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 23.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NRILY trades at $41.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs WIZEY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while WIZEY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs WPLCF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 14.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while WPLCF trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs TISNF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while TISNF trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DTATF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DTATF trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs ISMAF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 6.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while ISMAF trades at $35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs RPYTF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs BECTY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while BECTY trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs BHTLF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs TSYHY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while TSYHY trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs TSYHF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while TSYHF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SPSAF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SPSAF trades at $206.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs ISMAY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while ISMAY trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CTLPP Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CTLPP trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1333.33. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NWITY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NWKLF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NSSXF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs AEXAY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while AEXAY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is less volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SLNTY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SLNTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NTCYF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CFTLF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CFTLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NDTAF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NDTAF trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NCRRP Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs ATEAY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while ATEAY trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs HLTEF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DUSXF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs ATAZF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DLGEF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DLGEF trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CCCMF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs NGRRF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while NGRRF trades at $79.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CRAYF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DTSOF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 967.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SESPF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SESPF trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs KSUEF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs KAHTY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs ADSGF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CTSDF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs TRCLF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs AEXAF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 762.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while AEXAF trades at $40.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs FDRVF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 732.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -31.57. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DCHIF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 551.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DCHIF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs FDDMF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs GBDMF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CMTUF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CEJOF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs TSSI Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 386.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while TSSI trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 64.33. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DTTLY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 347.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DTTLY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SLUNF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SVPLF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs ITFRF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 278.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while ITFRF trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CSYJF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 261.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CSYJF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SSCC Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SSCC trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CSYJY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 240.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs EMCHF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 226.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while EMCHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs APMRF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while APMRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs FCCN Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 220.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while FCCN trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -65.10. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs APPEF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 200.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while APPEF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs APXYY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 169.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while APXYY trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs ALVNF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs ULPRF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 136.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs ALYAF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 131.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while ALYAF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs QUISF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CNGFF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs QSCGF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -19.90. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs GSDT Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 90.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while GSDT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GSDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DCHIY Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 88.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DCHIY trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs KDCXF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs EAXR Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while EAXR trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs HLEO Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 56.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while HLEO trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HLEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CXGEF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SEBFF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SNELF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs MLBEF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 26.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while MLBEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs BNXAF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 24.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while BNXAF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SPOFF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 16.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SPOFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs KTHGF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs POSAF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 9.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while POSAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs XTMIF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 8.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs KNRLF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while KNRLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DVRNF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 5.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs BRQSF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 5.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while BRQSF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs FUUN Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while FUUN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DCSX Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DCSX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CPIHF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs DRGV Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs VSSSF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while VSSSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SKTCF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs SNOIF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs CRCW Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs MOBIF Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is more volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.
SCNTQ vs GTCH Comparison
SCNTQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCNTQ stands at 661.00. In comparison, GTCH has a market cap of 1.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SCNTQ is priced at $0.00, while GTCH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCNTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTCH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCNTQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GTCH's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SCNTQ is less volatile compared to GTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCNTQ.