Direxion Daily Russia Bear 3X Shares

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.84B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FIYY trades at $103.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FFEU trades at $90.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VTIP trades at $49.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VTAPX trades at $24.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VFSUX trades at $10.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VFSTX trades at $10.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VSBSX trades at $19.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VGSH trades at $58.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VWSTX trades at $15.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while MINT trades at $100.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while ASBFX trades at $9.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.36B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SCHO trades at $24.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while PTSHX trades at $9.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FTSM trades at $59.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FNGU trades at $353.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VFISX trades at $9.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SPTS trades at $29.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while TMF trades at $36.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SPXL trades at $150.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VSGBX trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while VSGDX trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while JSDHX trades at $9.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FLVCX trades at $38.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while BITX trades at $54.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while TBLL trades at $105.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FAS trades at $158.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while TECL trades at $73.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while PAIAX trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FSTTX trades at $9.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while DHLSX trades at $28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while DIAYX trades at $28.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while DWT trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while ORSTX trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while PRFSX trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while BASOX trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while ACSNX trades at $9.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while BULZ trades at $138.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 46.05. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while CPLSX trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 896.72M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SH trades at $43.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 758.58M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while TUA trades at $21.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 751.38M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while RYVYX trades at $511.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 751.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while RYCCX trades at $358.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 733.07M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while TAFI trades at $24.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 729.02M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while EXMAX trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 728.27M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while EMAIX trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 717.61M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SVIX trades at $15.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 695.37M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while RYVLX trades at $511.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 654.43M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while DPST trades at $88.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 650.59M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while PSQ trades at $36.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 641.53M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SVXY trades at $41.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 595.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while NVDX trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 589.60M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while JSCP trades at $46.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 550.92M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SOXS trades at $11.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 509.82M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while BPIRX trades at $13.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 509.67M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while BPRRX trades at $13.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 490.39M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while GIYAX trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 487.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while KOLD trades at $21.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 469.12M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SPXU trades at $19.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 449.63M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while GDXU trades at $54.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 447.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FSMB trades at $19.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 434.03M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FNGO trades at $91.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 427.92M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while DUST trades at $31.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 415.60M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while NUGT trades at $60.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 404.64M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SDHY trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 397.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while DXQLX trades at $87.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 391.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SDS trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +7.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 365.84M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FSHSX trades at $9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 356.87M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SPXS trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 354.75M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SEMRX trades at $9.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.51M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while MRRL trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.09M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FLGE trades at $809.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 282.90M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while UUP trades at $27.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.84M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while MORL trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 273.80M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while NAIL trades at $59.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 265.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SMB trades at $16.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 251.78M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while QID trades at $29.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 240.07M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while JNUG trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 239.84M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while GGLL trades at $29.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 232.48M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while UVXY trades at $21.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.88M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while TENG trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 229.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while AMZU trades at $34.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 226.77M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while GUSH trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 225.44M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while STOT trades at $46.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 215.25M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while TZA trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 215.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FTSD trades at $90.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 214.32M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while ERX trades at $52.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 209.79M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while TWUSX trades at $9.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.39M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while REML trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 197.67M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while FUMB trades at $20.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, USDU has a market cap of 197.63M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while USDU trades at $26.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USDU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to USDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 191.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while SDOW trades at $47.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 190.87M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while RWM trades at $19.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 183.57M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while TMV trades at $40.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 173.56M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while DFEN trades at $36.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 36.90. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 171.92M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while EMNT trades at $98.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 168.47M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while CVSB trades at $50.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.

RUSS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUSS stands at 24.27M. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 165.30M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSS is priced at $9.09, while CLSE trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUSS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, RUSS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSS is more volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSS.