Right On Brands, Inc.
Right On Brands, Inc. RTON Peers
See (RTON) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTON | $0.04 | +33.33% | 1.26M | -2.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| NSRGY | $103.27 | -0.52% | 266.43B | 20.82 | $4.96 | +2.53% |
| NSRGF | $102.43 | -1.56% | 263.32B | 20.65 | $4.96 | +3.61% |
| DANOY | $16.61 | +1.10% | 53.50B | 24.07 | $0.69 | +2.24% |
| GPDNF | $82.09 | -0.92% | 52.88B | 23.45 | $3.50 | +2.96% |
| TUFBY | $11.53 | +35.65% | 47.32B | 16.47 | $0.70 | +3.39% |
| AJINY | $22.75 | +0.51% | 22.62B | 94.79 | $0.24 | +1.17% |
| ELOAF | $0.01 | +799900.00% | 22.44B | 0.80 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ASBFF | $29.04 | N/A | 20.91B | 12.31 | $2.36 | +2.96% |
| AJINF | $20.72 | -50.07% | 20.60B | 86.33 | $0.24 | +1.32% |
Stock Comparison
RTON vs NSRGY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 266.43B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while NSRGY trades at $103.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs NSRGF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 263.32B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while NSRGF trades at $102.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs DANOY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 53.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while DANOY trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs GPDNF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 52.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while GPDNF trades at $82.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to GPDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TUFBY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 47.32B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TUFBY trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs AJINY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 22.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while AJINY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 94.79. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs ELOAF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, ELOAF has a market cap of 22.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while ELOAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ELOAF's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ELOAF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to ELOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs ASBFF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 20.91B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while ASBFF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to ASBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs AJINF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 20.60B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while AJINF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 86.33. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to AJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs ASBFY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 20.28B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while ASBFY trades at $28.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs KRYAY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 17.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while KRYAY trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs KRYAF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 16.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while KRYAF trades at $102.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs JBSAY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while JBSAY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs GRBMF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 13.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while GRBMF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to GRBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs BMBOY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 13.06B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while BMBOY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to BMBOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs JDEPF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 12.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while JDEPF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to JDEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs WHGRF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 11.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while WHGRF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs LOTBY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, LOTBY has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while LOTBY trades at $134.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LOTBY's P/E ratio is 66.13. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LOTBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to LOTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs WHGLY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 10.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while WHGLY trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs ORKLY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 10.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while ORKLY trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs ORKLF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 10.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while ORKLF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to ORKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs CIADF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to CIADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TYCMY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 9.58B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TYCMY trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs KIKOF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 9.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while KIKOF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs KIKOY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 9.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while KIKOY trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to KIKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TCYMF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TCYMF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to TCYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs CIADY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while CIADY trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 577.50. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TTAZF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.77B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to TTAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs PIFFY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs SAPIF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while SAPIF trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -68.81. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to SAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs WWNTF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 7.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while WWNTF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to WWNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs CFEIY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while CFEIY trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to CFEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs GCHOY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while GCHOY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs SDPNF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TSUKY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TSUKY trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs GPAGF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while GPAGF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to GPAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs ARHUF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while ARHUF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to ARHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs DLLFF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to DLLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs CHFLF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while CHFLF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TSUKF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs MEJHY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while MEJHY trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to MEJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs NFPDF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 5.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while NFPDF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to NFPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs MEJHF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs EMLZF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while EMLZF trades at $990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs SMPFF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to SMPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs IOIOF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to IOIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs PIFMY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while PIFMY trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs PIFMF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to PIFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs NSLYF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while NSLYF trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to NSLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs ACOPF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while ACOPF trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to ACOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs MRRTY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while MRRTY trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TATYY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TATYY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to TATYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs NIPMY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs UVRBF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while UVRBF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to UVRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs CRWKF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs UVRBY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while UVRBY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to UVRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs NSFMF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to NSFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TATYF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TATYF trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs GLAPY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while GLAPY trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to GLAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs GLAPF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while GLAPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs NCHEY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs FPAFY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while FPAFY trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs YMZBY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while YMZBY trades at $152.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs FPAFF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while FPAFF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to FPAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs CBCFF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while CBCFF trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to CBCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs EBRPY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to EBRPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs EBRPF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to EBRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs SUEZF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while SUEZF trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is 52.16. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to SUEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs PRBZF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while PRBZF trades at $59.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to PRBZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs SUEZY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while SUEZY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is 52.92. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to SUEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs LYSFF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while LYSFF trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs LYSFY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while LYSFY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs ARZTF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs CLBEY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while CLBEY trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to CLBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs NHFOF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while NHFOF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to NHFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs FTROF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while FTROF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs MLFNF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while MLFNF trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to MLFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs ARZTY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while ARZTY trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TBLMF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TBLMF trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs PRRFY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while PRRFY trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to PRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs SGLJF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs PFODF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while PFODF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs GRPBF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to GRPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs HOFJF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while HOFJF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to HOFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TBLMY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to TBLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs FSRCY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while FSRCY trades at $109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs YNNHF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to YNNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs TUFUF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs AVSFY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while AVSFY trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to AVSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs FNEVF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to FNEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs HLFGY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs VTSYF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while VTSYF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 128.00. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs NISUY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while NISUY trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs FNEVY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while FNEVY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to FNEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs GNCGY Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while GNCGY trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is less volatile compared to GNCGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs GBFBF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to GBFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs AKEJF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while AKEJF trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs HLTFF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to HLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.
RTON vs JWLLF Comparison
RTON plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTON stands at 1.26M. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RTON is priced at $0.04, while JWLLF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTON currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, RTON's ROE is +0.56%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RTON is more volatile compared to JWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTON.