Renault SA

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VWA.BR has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while VWA.BR trades at €125.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas VWA.BR's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VWA.BR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is more volatile compared to VWA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VWAP.BR has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while VWAP.BR trades at €108.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas VWAP.BR's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VWAP.BR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is more volatile compared to VWAP.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, STLA.PA has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while STLA.PA trades at €15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas STLA.PA's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STLA.PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is more volatile compared to STLA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, STLAP.PA has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while STLAP.PA trades at €7.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas STLAP.PA's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STLAP.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is less volatile compared to STLAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, EXO.AS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while EXO.AS trades at €89.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas EXO.AS's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXO.AS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is more volatile compared to EXO.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SCT.LS has a market cap of 208.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while SCT.LS trades at €5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas SCT.LS's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCT.LS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is more volatile compared to SCT.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, QEV.AS has a market cap of 157.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while QEV.AS trades at €6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas QEV.AS's P/E ratio is -345.00. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QEV.AS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is less volatile compared to QEV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, EBUS.AS has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while EBUS.AS trades at €0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas EBUS.AS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EBUS.AS's ROE of -2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is less volatile compared to EBUS.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ALGAU.PA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while ALGAU.PA trades at €0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas ALGAU.PA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALGAU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is less volatile compared to ALGAU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NAVYA.PA has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while NAVYA.PA trades at €0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas NAVYA.PA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAVYA.PA's ROE of -17.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is less volatile compared to NAVYA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.

RNO.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RNO.PA stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ALHPI.PA has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNO.PA is priced at €33.62, while ALHPI.PA trades at €0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RNO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.36, whereas ALHPI.PA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RNO.PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALHPI.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RNO.PA is less volatile compared to ALHPI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNO.PA.