RJK Explorations Ltd.
RJK Explorations Ltd. RJKAF Peers
See (RJKAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RJKAF | $0.04 | N/A | 3.50M | -3.60 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | -60.00% | 49.46B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $13.63 | +0.23% | 10.05B | 71.75 | $0.19 | +5.44% |
| ANGPY | $5.78 | -2.03% | 9.11B | 24.08 | $0.24 | +0.50% |
| IMPUF | $6.20 | +13.76% | 5.56B | -5.96 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| IMPUY | $6.18 | -0.32% | 5.54B | -5.94 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| OICT | $9.95 | N/A | 5.46B | -33.96 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | N/A | 4.16B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| GMINF | $13.17 | +0.63% | 2.97B | 35.59 | $0.37 | N/A |
| JINFF | $6.88 | +0.73% | 2.73B | 43.00 | $0.16 | +1.17% |
Stock Comparison
RJKAF vs AUXIF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 49.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs FNLPF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 10.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while FNLPF trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 71.75. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs ANGPY Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 9.11B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ANGPY trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs IMPUF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while IMPUF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and IMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs IMPUY Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while IMPUY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs OICT Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while OICT trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -33.96. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and OICT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs NMPNF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and NMPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs GMINF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while GMINF trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs JINFF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while JINFF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs POYYF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and POYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs AUCOY Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.89M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs ZMPLF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 892.32M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ZMPLF trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs GLGDF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 394.74M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while GLGDF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 120.77. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs TPRFF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332.02M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs ABBRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 289.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ABBRF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -20.09. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs TIHRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245.02M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs GOTRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 205.62M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while GOTRF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs SAPLF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 171.62M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SAPLF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs BRVMF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 151.25M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while BRVMF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -75.50. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and BRVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs IAUFF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 132.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while IAUFF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs PAASF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 124.94M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while PAASF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs BOCOF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 112.30M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while BOCOF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs SDRC Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 111.24M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SDRC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -297.35. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs CTNXF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.59M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs SLVTF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 81.11M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SLVTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs LUCRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 79.07M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while LUCRF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and LUCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs PLLHF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 77.79M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while PLLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs INMNF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to INMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and INMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs ACRG Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 72.81M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ACRG trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and ACRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs ARRKF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 71.40M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ARRKF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs BKRRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 69.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while BKRRF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs PDLMF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.32M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs TSORF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 62.52M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while TSORF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs ORVMF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 58.75M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ORVMF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs DNRSF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 58.05M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while DNRSF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs XANAF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 57.37M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while XANAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs OCGSF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 54.96M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while OCGSF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs FREDF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 53.15M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while FREDF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs DNCVF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 47.97M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while DNCVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs SMDRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 47.81M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SMDRF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs EMPYF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 47.01M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while EMPYF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 39.64. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs VLMGF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 46.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while VLMGF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -42.39. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs SSVFF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 46.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SSVFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs CHPGF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 46.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while CHPGF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -22.47. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs PDIV Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 41.14M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while PDIV trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs TEUTF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 35.91M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while TEUTF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -15.55. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and TEUTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs SCTSF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 35.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SCTSF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs HMRRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.51M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and HMRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs SNNGF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 35.21M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SNNGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and SNNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs FCSUF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs MMNGF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 32.70M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while MMNGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -18.28. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs OKPRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs DYNR Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 30.49M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while DYNR trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs TLSMF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs CAPTF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 29.94M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while CAPTF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -30.44. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and CAPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs HEGLF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 28.07M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while HEGLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs WEXPF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 27.48M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while WEXPF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs ACKRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 27.40M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ACKRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs ADYRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 25.99M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ADYRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and ADYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs GLDRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.61M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs TBXXF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 25.44M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while TBXXF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and TBXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs KDKCF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 25.31M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while KDKCF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs EQMEF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 24.68M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while EQMEF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs AGLDF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 24.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs GSMGF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.78M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs EMPPF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 23.56M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while EMPPF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs BBBXF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 23.09M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while BBBXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs GMDMF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 23.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while GMDMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and GMDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs SSVRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 22.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SSVRF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs WAMFF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 21.52M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while WAMFF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and WAMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs URVNF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.77M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs PVGDF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 20.60M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while PVGDF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs NAUFF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 20.52M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while NAUFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs CJIMF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 20.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while CJIMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs MRZLF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 19.96M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while MRZLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and MRZLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs MERG Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.53M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs AUCUF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 19.25M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while AUCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs SHGDF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 18.53M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs RKHNF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 18.45M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while RKHNF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and RKHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs BRGC Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 18.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while BRGC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs SMOFF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 18.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SMOFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs ELRFF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 17.76M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ELRFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and ELRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs CTMCF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 17.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while CTMCF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs AUSVF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.75M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs VOYRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 16.64M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs SEKZF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.46M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs BYRG Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 15.58M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs ESGLF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 15.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ESGLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs HGLD Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 14.42M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while HGLD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs GBRRF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 13.94M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while GBRRF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and GBRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs SUNPF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 13.67M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while SUNPF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and SUNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs LGCXF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 12.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while LGCXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs ATEPF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 12.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while ATEPF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF and ATEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RJKAF vs BWCGF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, BWCGF has a market cap of 12.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while BWCGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas BWCGF's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to BWCGF's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to BWCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs MHTZF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 12.04M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while MHTZF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs THMG Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 11.73M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while THMG trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -16.01. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs KGFMF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 11.55M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while KGFMF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs LBCMF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 11.39M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while LBCMF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.
RJKAF vs TSLVF Comparison
RJKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJKAF stands at 3.50M. In comparison, TSLVF has a market cap of 11.35M. Regarding current trading prices, RJKAF is priced at $0.04, while TSLVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJKAF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.60, whereas TSLVF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, RJKAF's ROE is +3.29%, compared to TSLVF's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJKAF is less volatile compared to TSLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJKAF.