Reliance Infrastructure Limited

RIFS.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RIFS.L stands at 465.56M. In comparison, NG.L has a market cap of 50.21B. Regarding current trading prices, RIFS.L is priced at $3.00, while NG.L trades at $1,024.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RIFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas NG.L's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, RIFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NG.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIFS.L is less volatile compared to NG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIFS.L.

RIFS.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RIFS.L stands at 465.56M. In comparison, CKI.L has a market cap of 13.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RIFS.L is priced at $3.00, while CKI.L trades at $526.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RIFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas CKI.L's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, RIFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CKI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RIFS.L is less volatile compared to CKI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIFS.L.

RIFS.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RIFS.L stands at 465.56M. In comparison, 0KIT.L has a market cap of 10.87B. Regarding current trading prices, RIFS.L is priced at $3.00, while 0KIT.L trades at $91.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RIFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas 0KIT.L's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, RIFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0KIT.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RIFS.L and 0KIT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

RIFS.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RIFS.L stands at 465.56M. In comparison, NTEA.L has a market cap of 145.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RIFS.L is priced at $3.00, while NTEA.L trades at $130.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RIFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas NTEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTEA.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIFS.L and NTEA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

RIFS.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RIFS.L stands at 465.56M. In comparison, JEL.L has a market cap of 127.43M. Regarding current trading prices, RIFS.L is priced at $3.00, while JEL.L trades at $430.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RIFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.64, whereas JEL.L's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, RIFS.L's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JEL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RIFS.L is less volatile compared to JEL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIFS.L.