Market Access Rogers International Commodity Index UCITS ETF
Market Access Rogers International Commodity Index UCITS ETF RICI.L Peers
See (RICI.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
RICI.L vs CNDX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CNDX.L has a market cap of 19.44T. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CNDX.L trades at $1,185.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNDX.L's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CNDX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CNDX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.37T. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IUSA.L trades at $4,380.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.04T. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SSAC.L trades at $6,939.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 851.77B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SMEA.L trades at $7,192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XESX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 820.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XESX.L trades at $4,761.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XESC.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 802.67B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XESC.L trades at $7,816.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IITU.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 777.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IITU.L trades at $2,442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 752.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while MEUD.L trades at $21,765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 653.28B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CNAL.L trades at $11,568.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 560.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IWRD.L trades at $6,112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 540.64B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XDAX.L trades at $18,606.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 498.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while PHGP.L trades at $22,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 497.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XMMS.L trades at $4,674.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 486.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while GLDA.L trades at $9,728.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 479.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while MXWS.L trades at $8,973.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 455.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XMUS.L trades at $13,046.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs UC44.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 440.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while UC44.L trades at $12,652.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CS51.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 419.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CS51.L trades at $17,118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 400.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XMEU.L trades at $8,214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs EUE.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 375.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while EUE.L trades at $4,674.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 372.67B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IEEM.L trades at $3,431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs UB32.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 352.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while UB32.L trades at $8,727.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CACX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 346.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CACX.L trades at $6,600.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 308.66B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XSX6.L trades at $11,536.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 302.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IWFQ.L trades at $5,289.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 300.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SEMA.L trades at $3,226.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 296.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while GBSS.L trades at $22,499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 279.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IWFV.L trades at $3,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 271.54B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SGBX.L trades at $23,477.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 241.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CEA1.L trades at $14,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 240.11B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while ISPY.L trades at $2,244.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 232.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while RBTX.L trades at $1,066.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 226.86B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CPJ1.L trades at $14,815.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SUES.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 224.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SUES.L trades at $588.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 223.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while JRDE.L trades at $3,616.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs JERE.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 220.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while JERE.L trades at $3,852.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 207.96B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IUQF.L trades at $1,105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 202.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while HMEF.L trades at $876.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 201.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IWFM.L trades at $6,428.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 192.70B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while PHSP.L trades at $2,260.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 192.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while ISP6.L trades at $6,567.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 189.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XDEV.L trades at $3,703.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SOYU.L trades at $307.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 173.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while UIFS.L trades at $1,116.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 167.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XXSC.L trades at $5,298.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 167.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CEUR.L trades at $30,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 163.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XDEQ.L trades at $5,376.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 161.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SPGP.L trades at $1,639.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CU1.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 147.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CU1.L trades at $45,122.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 146.77B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while PRIR.L trades at $1,450.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 146.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IEFV.L trades at $840.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 144.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while RIEG.L trades at $1,426.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 143.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while GBSP.L trades at $1,670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs WATL.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 138.31B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while WATL.L trades at $5,712.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 135.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CUS1.L trades at $38,502.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 133.21B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XCX6.L trades at $1,353.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 133.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IPRP.L trades at $2,588.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 132.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XZEU.L trades at $2,767.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs GILS.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 130.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while GILS.L trades at $10,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GILS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 128.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while 0GWB.IL trades at $520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs UC79.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 125.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while UC79.L trades at $1,093.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 120.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SPEX.L trades at $4,486.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs INFL.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while INFL.L trades at $9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CG1.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 118.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CG1.L trades at $35,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CB5.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 118.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CB5.L trades at $3,769.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 116.69B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XRSG.L trades at $23,113.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 113.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SP5G.L trades at $196.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 61.18. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 113.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IGSG.L trades at $5,825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SPES.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 112.69B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SPES.L trades at $4,249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SPES.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 112.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IJPN.L trades at $1,401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 111.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XDEM.L trades at $5,416.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 111.06B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CSPX.L trades at $618.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs H50E.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 109.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while H50E.L trades at $4,825.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 108.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IEUX.L trades at $4,021.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 107.23B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while JRDM.L trades at $2,326.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 106.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while PRIC.L trades at $1,586.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IMV.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IMV.L trades at $5,619.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 101.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IWDA.L trades at $110.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs COMM.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 100.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while COMM.L trades at $549.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 99.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CSCA.L trades at $16,611.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs UB45.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 95.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while UB45.L trades at $6,196.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 93.68B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while PRIJ.L trades at $2,417.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 92.70B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while MTIX.L trades at $13,934.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 91.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while DAXX.L trades at $18,152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 90.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XLKQ.L trades at $49,945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 90.70B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while WQDS.L trades at $558.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 89.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IUKD.L trades at $809.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 88.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XDN0.L trades at $4,146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 85.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IGUS.L trades at $13,266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 84.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while XDEB.L trades at $3,622.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 84.68B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CRPX.L trades at $12,758.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 84.00B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while CSP1.L trades at $46,765.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs INAA.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 83.91B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while INAA.L trades at $8,165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs HMCH.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, HMCH.L has a market cap of 81.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while HMCH.L trades at $567.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMCH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HMCH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to HMCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs IDVY.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, IDVY.L has a market cap of 77.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while IDVY.L trades at $1,817.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDVY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IDVY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to IDVY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs FXC.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, FXC.L has a market cap of 77.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while FXC.L trades at $7,748.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FXC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to FXC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs HMXJ.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, HMXJ.L has a market cap of 77.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while HMXJ.L trades at $1,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMXJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HMXJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is more volatile compared to HMXJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs GLDW.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, GLDW.L has a market cap of 76.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while GLDW.L trades at $24,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLDW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to GLDW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
RICI.L vs SWDA.L Comparison
RICI.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RICI.L stands at 43.90M. In comparison, SWDA.L has a market cap of 76.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RICI.L is priced at $22.92, while SWDA.L trades at $8,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RICI.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RICI.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RICI.L is less volatile compared to SWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RICI.L.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RICI.L | $22.92 | +1.43% | 43.90M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CNDX.L | $1,185.60 | +3.22% | 19.44T | 32.82 | $36.12 | N/A |
| IUSA.L | $4,380.50 | +3.20% | 1.37T | N/A | N/A | +1.08% |
| SSAC.L | $6,939.00 | +2.61% | 1.04T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | $7,192.00 | +0.70% | 851.77B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | $4,761.50 | +0.92% | 820.04B | N/A | N/A | +2.72% |
| XESC.L | $7,816.50 | +0.92% | 802.67B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IITU.L | $2,442.00 | +4.54% | 777.63B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | $21,765.00 | +0.62% | 752.46B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CNAL.L | $11,568.00 | +2.81% | 653.28B | -10.81 | -$10.70 | N/A |