Pittards plc

PTD.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PTD.L stands at 786645.00. In comparison, DOCS.L has a market cap of 556.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PTD.L is priced at $5.47, while DOCS.L trades at $57.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PTD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.82, whereas DOCS.L's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, PTD.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOCS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PTD.L is less volatile compared to DOCS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTD.L.

PTD.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PTD.L stands at 786645.00. In comparison, 0RUJ.L has a market cap of 325.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PTD.L is priced at $5.47, while 0RUJ.L trades at $45.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PTD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.82, whereas 0RUJ.L's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, PTD.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0RUJ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PTD.L is more volatile compared to 0RUJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTD.L.

PTD.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PTD.L stands at 786645.00. In comparison, 0QP3.L has a market cap of 129.93M. Regarding current trading prices, PTD.L is priced at $5.47, while 0QP3.L trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PTD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.82, whereas 0QP3.L's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, PTD.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0QP3.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PTD.L is more volatile compared to 0QP3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTD.L.

PTD.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PTD.L stands at 786645.00. In comparison, MUL.L has a market cap of 57.79M. Regarding current trading prices, PTD.L is priced at $5.47, while MUL.L trades at $82.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PTD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.82, whereas MUL.L's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, PTD.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUL.L's ROE of -3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PTD.L is less volatile compared to MUL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PTD.L.