Proximus PLC

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, VERIZ.BR has a market cap of 227.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while VERIZ.BR trades at $54.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas VERIZ.BR's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VERIZ.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to VERIZ.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, DTEL.BR has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while DTEL.BR trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas DTEL.BR's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTEL.BR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to DTEL.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ORA.PA has a market cap of 34.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while ORA.PA trades at $12.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas ORA.PA's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORA.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to ORA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, TFA.BR has a market cap of 22.43B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while TFA.BR trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas TFA.BR's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFA.BR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to TFA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, KPN.AS has a market cap of 16.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while KPN.AS trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas KPN.AS's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPN.AS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is more volatile compared to KPN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, IAM.PA has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while IAM.PA trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas IAM.PA's P/E ratio is 52.16. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IAM.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is more volatile compared to IAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, TIT.BR has a market cap of 6.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while TIT.BR trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas TIT.BR's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIT.BR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to TIT.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, TNET.BR has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while TNET.BR trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas TNET.BR's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNET.BR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is more volatile compared to TNET.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, VEON.AS has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while VEON.AS trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas VEON.AS's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEON.AS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is more volatile compared to VEON.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, NOS.LS has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while NOS.LS trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas NOS.LS's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOS.LS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to NOS.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, OBEL.BR has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while OBEL.BR trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas OBEL.BR's P/E ratio is 44.41. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OBEL.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is more volatile compared to OBEL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, TISN.BR has a market cap of 126.35M. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while TISN.BR trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas TISN.BR's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TISN.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to TISN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, PAR.MC has a market cap of 64.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while PAR.MC trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas PAR.MC's P/E ratio is -23.14. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAR.MC's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to PAR.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALOSM.PA has a market cap of 41.53M. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while ALOSM.PA trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas ALOSM.PA's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALOSM.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is more volatile compared to ALOSM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, PHR.LS has a market cap of 39.78M. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while PHR.LS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas PHR.LS's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PHR.LS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to PHR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALBUD.PA has a market cap of 21.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while ALBUD.PA trades at $3.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas ALBUD.PA's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALBUD.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to ALBUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, LLN.MC has a market cap of 20.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while LLN.MC trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas LLN.MC's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LLN.MC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to LLN.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALLLN.PA has a market cap of 19.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while ALLLN.PA trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas ALLLN.PA's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALLLN.PA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to ALLLN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ALBDM.PA has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while ALBDM.PA trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas ALBDM.PA's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALBDM.PA's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to ALBDM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, MLWEA.PA has a market cap of 886509.00. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while MLWEA.PA trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas MLWEA.PA's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLWEA.PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is more volatile compared to MLWEA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, MLNEO.PA has a market cap of 194058.00. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while MLNEO.PA trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas MLNEO.PA's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLNEO.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is less volatile compared to MLNEO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.

PROX.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PROX.BR stands at 2.14B. In comparison, ILD.PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PROX.BR is priced at $6.63, while ILD.PA trades at $182.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PROX.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas ILD.PA's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, PROX.BR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ILD.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROX.BR is more volatile compared to ILD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROX.BR.