The Meet Kevin Pricing Power ETF

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.39T. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VOO trades at $535.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.33T. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VFINX trades at $522.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.15T. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VITSX trades at $135.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.15T. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VTSAX trades at $135.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 595.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VTI trades at $287.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 593.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while FXAIX trades at $196.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 584.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while IVV trades at $585.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 534.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while SPY trades at $582.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 474.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VXUS trades at $65.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 469.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VTSNX trades at $139.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 330.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VMCPX trades at $354.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 302.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VIMAX trades at $325.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 290.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VIIIX trades at $460.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 290.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VINIX trades at $460.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 257.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RGAGX trades at $72.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 257.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while GAFFX trades at $72.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 256.92B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AGTHX trades at $72.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 254.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while GFAFX trades at $71.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RLBGX trades at $34.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while ABALX trades at $34.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while BALFX trades at $34.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AFMBX trades at $34.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AMBFX trades at $34.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 228.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RGABX trades at $64.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 224.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RGAAX trades at $63.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 219.39B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while GFACX trades at $61.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 215.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VEA trades at $53.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 214.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VTMNX trades at $17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 214.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VDIPX trades at $26.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 204.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VB trades at $231.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 199.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while QQQ trades at $507.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 194.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while BX trades at $149.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 194.26B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VTV trades at $171.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 179.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VO trades at $269.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 148.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while BLK trades at $958.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 147.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while FCTDX trades at $16.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AIVSX trades at $56.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RICBX trades at $56.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AICFX trades at $56.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AICCX trades at $56.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RICAX trades at $56.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 145.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while FCNTX trades at $20.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 145.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while FCNKX trades at $20.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 141.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while C-PN trades at $29.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while ANWPX trades at $63.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while NPFFX trades at $63.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RNPGX trades at $63.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while FNPFX trades at $63.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 138.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AWSHX trades at $61.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 138.39B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while FWMIX trades at $61.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 138.39B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RWMFX trades at $61.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 137.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while CWMAX trades at $61.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 137.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while WSHFX trades at $61.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 135.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while WSHCX trades at $60.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 135.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RWMBX trades at $60.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 134.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while CFNAX trades at $80.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 134.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while ANCFX trades at $80.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 134.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AFIFX trades at $80.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 133.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while IEFA trades at $80.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 126.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AEPFX trades at $57.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 126.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AEGFX trades at $57.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 126.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RERHX trades at $57.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 126.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RERGX trades at $57.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 126.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AEPGX trades at $57.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 122.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AGG trades at $97.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 124.26. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 111.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while KKR trades at $125.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 38.18. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 110.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while IWF trades at $390.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 106.94B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VWELX trades at $42.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 106.94B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VWENX trades at $73.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 104.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VIG trades at $197.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 103.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VSCIX trades at $107.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 103.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while NAESX trades at $107.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 102.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VTTHX trades at $24.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 101.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VDADX trades at $52.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while SEEGX trades at $75.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while JLGMX trades at $79.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while JLGRX trades at $78.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 99.37B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while FSKAX trades at $155.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 97.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VUG trades at $403.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 96.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VTHRX trades at $38.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 94.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VGT trades at $598.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 94.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while BAM trades at $57.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 41.35. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 92.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while IJH trades at $61.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 92.23B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VFORX trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 90.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VTIVX trades at $30.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 90.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VITAX trades at $292.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 33.99. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 89.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while DODGX trades at $256.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 89.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while TBCIX trades at $177.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 88.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while TRBCX trades at $176.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 87.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while BN trades at $58.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 189.35. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 85.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while PABGX trades at $170.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 83.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RAFFX trades at $42.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 83.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AMCPX trades at $41.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 81.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VEMAX trades at $38.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 81.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while VIEIX trades at $134.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, EFA has a market cap of 81.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while EFA trades at $86.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas EFA's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to EFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 79.60B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while RRBGX trades at $158.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 79.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while AMPFX trades at $40.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.

PP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PP stands at 25.45M. In comparison, DODFX has a market cap of 78.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PP is priced at $26.10, while DODFX trades at $56.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PP currently has a P/E ratio of 30.88, whereas DODFX's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, PP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PP is more volatile compared to DODFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PP.