Poshmark, Inc.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.16T. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while AMZN trades at $203.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 294.83B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BABA trades at $121.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 132.12B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while MELI trades at $2,606.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 64.20. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 95.12B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while SE trades at $160.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 112.36. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 77.78B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while ORLY trades at $1,364.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 64.69B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while CVNA trades at $302.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 105.63. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 64.50B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while AZO trades at $3,855.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 49.52B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while CPNG trades at $27.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 194.82. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 49.12B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while JD trades at $33.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 42.53B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while PDD trades at $119.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 37.47B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while VIPS trades at $14.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 33.25B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while EBAY trades at $72.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 26.34B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while TSCO trades at $49.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 24.23B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while FIVE trades at $110.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 19.72B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while WSM trades at $160.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 18.53B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while ULTA trades at $410.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 18.17B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while CHWY trades at $43.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 48.26. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.61B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while GPC trades at $126.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.48B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while CASY trades at $444.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.98B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BBY trades at $70.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 13.82B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while GME trades at $30.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 93.61. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 13.79B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while DKS trades at $172.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.26B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while CART trades at $47.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.67B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while MUSA trades at $438.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.68B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BBWI trades at $31.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while QVCGP trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while GLBE trades at $32.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -86.78. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while ETSY trades at $47.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, W has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while W trades at $36.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas W's P/E ratio is -12.76. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while RH trades at $187.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 51.89. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while AAP trades at $49.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while ASO trades at $41.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while MNSO trades at $22.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while SVV trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 70.68. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while EYE trades at $18.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -58.56. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while WINA trades at $416.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while RVLV trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while EVGOW trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while EVGO trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.98. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while WOOF trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 909.51M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while HEPS trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.21. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 890.89M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while SBH trades at $8.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 887.64M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while RERE trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 886.85M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while TDUP trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -25.86. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 832.40M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while OLPX trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 781.14M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while LQDT trades at $25.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768.04M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 540.92M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BBW trades at $40.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 540.16M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while HNST trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -245.00. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 534.45M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while ARKO trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 156.33. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 485.23M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while ODP trades at $16.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 461.61M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while HZO trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 360.97M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BNED trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 342.57M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BWMX trades at $9.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -45.90. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 340.60M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BYON trades at $5.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 338.30M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while CHPT trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 308.92M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while FLWS trades at $4.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 276.39M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while LE trades at $8.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.21M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.51M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 210.77M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BARK trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 205.71M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while LOGC trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 199.61M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while JMIA trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 192.59M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BARK-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 188.15M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BZUN trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 149.96M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 141.97M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while AKA trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 136.71M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while DADA trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130.03M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 128.27M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while WBUY trades at $5.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 114.70M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while OCG trades at $5.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -30.73. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 107.84M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while NEGG trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 99.98M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to APRN's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 88.14M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while DIBS trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 81.17M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while SPWH trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 67.95M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while QVCGB trades at $3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 65.45M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while GRWG trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 53.25M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while NHTC trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 115.64. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.32M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 48.89M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while PRTS trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.23M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 43.95M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while HOUR trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 41.96M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BBBY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 39.24M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while QVCGA trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.05M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while KIRK trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KIRK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 25.83M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BGFV trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 25.33M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while TLF trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 22.82M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while YSG trades at $4.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 21.96M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while JBDI trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 21.22M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while CGTL trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 16.13M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while IPW trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 14.04M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while ZOOZ trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 14.02M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while ZKH trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.

POSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POSH stands at N/A. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14.01M. Regarding current trading prices, POSH is priced at $17.90, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, POSH's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POSH is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POSH.