Personal Assets Trust plc
Personal Assets Trust plc PNL.L Peers
See (PNL.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNL.L | $515.00 | -0.19% | 1.63B | 23.66 | $0.22 | +1.40% |
| CNDX.L | $1,219.60 | +0.48% | 20.02T | 32.90 | $37.06 | N/A |
| IUSA.L | $4,419.25 | -0.09% | 1.32T | N/A | N/A | +1.07% |
| SSAC.L | $6,975.00 | -0.13% | 1.04T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | $7,189.00 | -0.11% | 840.72B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESC.L | $7,854.50 | -0.03% | 814.21B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | $4,784.25 | -0.04% | 806.59B | N/A | N/A | +2.71% |
| IITU.L | $2,525.00 | +0.92% | 767.77B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | $21,767.50 | -0.13% | 752.54B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CNAL.L | $11,586.00 | +0.89% | 654.30B | -10.83 | -$10.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PNL.L vs CNDX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CNDX.L has a market cap of 20.02T. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CNDX.L trades at $1,219.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CNDX.L's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNDX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CNDX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.32T. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IUSA.L trades at $4,419.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.04T. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SSAC.L trades at $6,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 840.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SMEA.L trades at $7,189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XESC.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 814.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XESC.L trades at $7,854.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XESX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 806.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XESX.L trades at $4,784.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IITU.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 767.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IITU.L trades at $2,525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 752.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while MEUD.L trades at $21,767.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 654.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CNAL.L trades at $11,586.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 561.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IWRD.L trades at $6,152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 537.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XDAX.L trades at $18,589.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 499.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XMMS.L trades at $4,707.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 487.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while PHGP.L trades at $22,317.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 474.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while GLDA.L trades at $9,501.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 444.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XMUS.L trades at $13,160.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs UC44.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 441.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while UC44.L trades at $12,706.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 426.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XMEU.L trades at $8,203.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CS51.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 414.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CS51.L trades at $17,187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 372.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IEEM.L trades at $3,456.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs EUE.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 370.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while EUE.L trades at $4,692.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs UB32.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 359.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while UB32.L trades at $8,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CACX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 345.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CACX.L trades at $6,612.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 308.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SEMA.L trades at $3,251.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 306.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XSX6.L trades at $11,517.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 296.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IWFQ.L trades at $5,299.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 289.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while GBSS.L trades at $21,972.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 273.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IWFV.L trades at $3,563.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 265.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SGBX.L trades at $22,925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 243.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while ISPY.L trades at $2,281.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 238.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CEA1.L trades at $14,753.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 228.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while RBTX.L trades at $1,074.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 227.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CPJ1.L trades at $14,835.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SUES.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 226.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SUES.L trades at $592.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 221.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while JRDE.L trades at $3,619.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs JERE.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 220.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while JERE.L trades at $3,853.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 205.34B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while UIFS.L trades at $1,117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 202.92B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while HMEF.L trades at $882.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 202.74B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IUQF.L trades at $1,108.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 200.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IWFM.L trades at $6,489.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 189.26B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while PHSP.L trades at $2,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 186.43B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XDEV.L trades at $3,675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SOYU.L trades at $307.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 168.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XXSC.L trades at $5,340.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 167.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CEUR.L trades at $30,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 164.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XDEQ.L trades at $5,394.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 151.39B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SPGP.L trades at $1,574.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CU1.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 143.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CU1.L trades at $45,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 141.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while GBSP.L trades at $1,642.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 140.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IEFV.L trades at $841.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 138.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while ISP6.L trades at $6,565.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 136.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while PRIR.L trades at $1,447.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 134.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XCX6.L trades at $1,364.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 132.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IPRP.L trades at $2,551.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs WATL.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 132.40B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while WATL.L trades at $5,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 131.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XZEU.L trades at $2,762.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 130.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CUS1.L trades at $38,485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs GILS.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 130.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while GILS.L trades at $10,011.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 128.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while 0GWB.IL trades at $519.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs UC79.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 125.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while UC79.L trades at $1,100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs INFL.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while INFL.L trades at $9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CB5.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 119.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CB5.L trades at $3,805.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CG1.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 117.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CG1.L trades at $35,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 116.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XRSG.L trades at $23,056.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 115.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SP5G.L trades at $199.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 62.17. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 112.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CSPX.L trades at $627.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 112.60B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XDEM.L trades at $5,463.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 111.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IGSG.L trades at $5,821.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 109.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IJPN.L trades at $1,369.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs H50E.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 109.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while H50E.L trades at $4,847.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SPES.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 108.98B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SPES.L trades at $4,222.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 108.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SPEX.L trades at $4,465.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 108.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while JRDM.L trades at $2,347.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 106.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IEUX.L trades at $4,022.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 106.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while PRIC.L trades at $1,587.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 106.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while RIEG.L trades at $1,426.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 102.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IWDA.L trades at $111.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IMV.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IMV.L trades at $5,599.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 100.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while DAXX.L trades at $18,131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 98.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CSCA.L trades at $16,611.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 93.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XLKQ.L trades at $51,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 92.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while MTIX.L trades at $13,911.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs UB45.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 92.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while UB45.L trades at $6,086.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 91.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while PRIJ.L trades at $2,363.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 90.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IUKD.L trades at $808.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 90.43B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while WQDS.L trades at $554.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs COMM.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 88.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while COMM.L trades at $546.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 88.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while EQDS.L trades at $547.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 87.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XDN0.L trades at $4,126.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 84.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CRPX.L trades at $12,766.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 84.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while CSP1.L trades at $47,201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 83.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IGUS.L trades at $13,461.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 83.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while XDEB.L trades at $3,564.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs EQSG.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, EQSG.L has a market cap of 82.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while EQSG.L trades at $4,993.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EQSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to EQSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs HMCH.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, HMCH.L has a market cap of 82.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while HMCH.L trades at $573.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas HMCH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMCH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to HMCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs INAA.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 81.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while INAA.L trades at $8,221.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs IDVY.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, IDVY.L has a market cap of 78.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while IDVY.L trades at $1,837.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IDVY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDVY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to IDVY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs SWDA.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, SWDA.L has a market cap of 76.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while SWDA.L trades at $8,412.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SWDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to SWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs HMXJ.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, HMXJ.L has a market cap of 76.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while HMXJ.L trades at $1,096.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas HMXJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMXJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to HMXJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.
PNL.L vs GLDW.L Comparison
PNL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PNL.L stands at 1.63B. In comparison, GLDW.L has a market cap of 75.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PNL.L is priced at $515.00, while GLDW.L trades at $23,807.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PNL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas GLDW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PNL.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLDW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PNL.L is more volatile compared to GLDW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PNL.L.