Playgon Games Inc.
Playgon Games Inc. PLGNF Peers
See (PLGNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLGNF | $0.01 | +5.26% | 2.79M | -0.17 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $291.53 | -0.80% | 340.09B | 52.91 | $5.51 | +0.82% |
| CNSWF | $3,564.07 | -2.49% | 75.53B | 103.40 | $34.47 | +0.11% |
| NEMKY | $20.50 | N/A | 59.19B | 58.57 | $0.35 | +0.45% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.45B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTY | $38.55 | +1.34% | 50.64B | 38.17 | $1.01 | +0.65% |
| DASTF | $38.35 | +2.82% | 50.38B | 37.97 | $1.01 | +0.71% |
| WTCHF | $63.67 | N/A | 21.13B | 104.38 | $0.61 | +0.16% |
| WIGBY | $61.84 | -3.39% | 20.52B | 103.06 | $0.60 | +0.21% |
| DIDIY | $4.58 | +0.44% | 19.93B | 152.67 | $0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PLGNF vs SAPGF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 340.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SAPGF trades at $291.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 52.91. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs CNSWF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 75.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while CNSWF trades at $3,564.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 103.40. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs NEMKY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 59.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while NEMKY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs INVUP Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs DASTY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 50.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while DASTY trades at $38.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs DASTF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 50.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while DASTF trades at $38.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 37.97. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs WTCHF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 21.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while WTCHF trades at $63.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 104.38. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs WIGBY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 20.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while WIGBY trades at $61.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 103.06. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs DIDIY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 19.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while DIDIY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 152.67. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs XROLF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 16.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while XROLF trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 132.53. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs SGGEF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SGGEF trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs SGPYY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SGPYY trades at $65.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs OCLCF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 15.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while OCLCF trades at $123.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs NEMTF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 71.85. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs OBIIF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 12.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while OBIIF trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs NCSYF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 9.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while NCSYF trades at $152.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs ALMFF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs KGDEY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while KGDEY trades at $177.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -322.73. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs THNOF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 78.26. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs HOILF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs TMSNY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while TMSNY trades at $74.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs TMNSF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs FNOXF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs SMCYY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs SICRF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs KXSCF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while KXSCF trades at $141.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 198.61. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs TMVWY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while TMVWY trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs LIFX Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while LIFX trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is -912.50. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs ASOZY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while ASOZY trades at $42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs ASOZF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs SRBEF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SRBEF trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs TMVWF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs UBMRF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs QTGPF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while QTGPF trades at $71.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs KHOTF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs ESKEF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs FREKF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while FREKF trades at $27.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -75.03. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs IPEU Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs WEMXF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs MAGTF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs TMOAY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while TMOAY trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -33.37. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs SWONF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SWONF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs ZEUCF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs GBGPF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while GBGPF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 105.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs EGHSF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while EGHSF trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs LTTHF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs KNNNF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while KNNNF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs VOBIF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 969.07M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while VOBIF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs ESIGF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs BTRCF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 748.46M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while BTRCF trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs SLVFF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs BVSFF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 699.35M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while BVSFF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs TTMZF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 649.53M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs BCTCF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 626.35M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while BCTCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs NPACF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs TMOAF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 547.40M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while TMOAF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -27.81. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs NPACY Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 510.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while NPACY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs RWWI Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 507.26M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while RWWI trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs NXLLF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 496.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while NXLLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs CMDXF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 485.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while CMDXF trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs NSWEF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs TCYSF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 454.87M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while TCYSF trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 219.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs BRDLF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 453.22M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs PXPHF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 424.68M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while PXPHF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 37.91. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs BLKLF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 423.90M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while BLKLF trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -71.89. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs IQGLF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs CHNVF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.86M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs RPGHF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 375.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs PSSWF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.50M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs LCHTF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs JAPPF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.66M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs ELMFF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.28M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs RLLMF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 318.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while RLLMF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 215.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs PLDIF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 311.29M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while PLDIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 69.55. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs BAINF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 307.83M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while BAINF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 134.50. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs DOTDF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.78M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs IVUFF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 295.99M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs CIGMF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 283.56M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs GBUX Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 281.83M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while GBUX trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs LOQPF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 270.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while LOQPF trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs EXMXF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 267.59M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs ABXXF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 224.72M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while ABXXF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs DAHLF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.46M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs FXSRF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs FBSFF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 195.53M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while FBSFF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs MCAP Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 194.05M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while MCAP trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs SMTEF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 173.05M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SMTEF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs WONDF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 161.35M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while WONDF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs IARGF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.43M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs SYZLF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 152.91M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while SYZLF trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -326.87. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs CBSZF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.34M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs TCIIF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 151.63M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs THNCF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, THNCF has a market cap of 146.26M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while THNCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas THNCF's P/E ratio is 107.50. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to THNCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to THNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs DFORF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 140.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while DFORF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs WECMF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.17M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs NEOJF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 135.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while NEOJF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs PSHPF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 125.67M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while PSHPF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to PSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs RTME Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 125.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.
PLGNF vs VCTTF Comparison
PLGNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLGNF stands at 2.79M. In comparison, VCTTF has a market cap of 123.92M. Regarding current trading prices, PLGNF is priced at $0.01, while VCTTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLGNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VCTTF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, PLGNF's ROE is +0.82%, compared to VCTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLGNF is more volatile compared to VCTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLGNF.