Pancontinental Energy NL
Pancontinental Energy NL PCOGF Peers
See (PCOGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCOGF | $0.01 | +3.09% | 81.37M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEYYY | $7.00 | -18.89% | 175.45B | 4.76 | $1.47 | +4.00% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | N/A | 66.78B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $14.00 | +1.82% | 26.54B | 7.49 | $1.87 | +8.75% |
| TRMLF | $46.28 | -2.49% | 17.32B | 19.12 | $2.42 | +5.44% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | N/A | 16.99B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| PEXNY | $7.98 | N/A | 15.84B | 6.88 | $1.16 | +6.63% |
| IPXHY | $13.12 | -0.30% | 15.71B | 5.40 | $2.43 | +3.24% |
| IPXHF | $11.54 | N/A | 13.82B | 4.75 | $2.43 | +4.40% |
| STOSF | $4.13 | -2.82% | 13.38B | 10.87 | $0.38 | +5.68% |
Stock Comparison
PCOGF vs MEYYY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 175.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs NSTKF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and NSTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs WOPEF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 26.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while WOPEF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs TRMLF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while TRMLF trades at $46.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs DETNF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and DETNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs PEXNY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PEXNY trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and PEXNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs IPXHY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 15.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while IPXHY trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs IPXHF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 13.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while IPXHF trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs STOSF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 13.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while STOSF trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs SSLZY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 13.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while SSLZY trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs AETUF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 12.39B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while AETUF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs NOVKY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and NOVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs SPGYF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 7.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while SPGYF trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs PTRRY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PTRRY trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and PTRRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs VSOGF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while VSOGF trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and VSOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs MEGEF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while MEGEF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs DKDRF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while DKDRF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs PREKF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PREKF trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs HBRIY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while HBRIY trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and HBRIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs PMOIF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PMOIF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs DLKGF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while DLKGF trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and DLKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs DELKY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while DELKY trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and DELKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs OASPW Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and OASPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs PEYUF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PEYUF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs EERGF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while EERGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and EERGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs BTEGF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and BTEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs JPTXF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while JPTXF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs BEPTF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while BEPTF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs NUVSF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while NUVSF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and NUVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs PRMRF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PRMRF trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs ATHOF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while ATHOF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs BCHEY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while BCHEY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs IPCFF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while IPCFF trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs PTGIF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PTGIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs FRHLF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while FRHLF trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and FRHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs AAVVF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while AAVVF trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -60.38. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and AAVVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs BIREF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while BIREF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs EFVIF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and EFVIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs DTNOF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while DTNOF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and DTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs CRCQW Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs WLLAW Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs CDDRF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while CDDRF trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and CDDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs KWTEF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 990.20M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while KWTEF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs KELTF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 962.98M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while KELTF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and KELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs AOIFF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 910.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while AOIFF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs PARXF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 904.49M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PARXF trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and PARXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs UNEGF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.47M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs CWEGF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.46M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs BWEFF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 807.75M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while BWEFF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs KRNGF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 742.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while KRNGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs CRLFF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 708.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while CRLFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs SQZZF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 687.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while SQZZF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs AAGEF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.40M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and AAGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs GFKSY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and GFKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs RCKHF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 467.44M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while RCKHF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs GUKYF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 442.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while GUKYF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs DALXF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 419.99M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while DALXF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs TBNRF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414.03M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and TBNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs PTALF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 388.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PTALF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs SHASF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 386.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while SHASF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and SHASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs KRNGY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 384.56M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while KRNGY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs BKBEF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.22M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs ZPTAF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 375.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while ZPTAF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -12.98. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs COPJF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 371.20M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while COPJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs PRYGF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and PRYGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs PTHRF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 354.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PTHRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs PEGIY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs CEIEF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 327.49M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while CEIEF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -61.63. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and CEIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs ATUUF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 319.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while ATUUF trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -36.23. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs ENQUF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316.04M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and ENQUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs TUWLF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 292.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while TUWLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and TUWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs PESAF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 282.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PESAF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and PESAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs FECCF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 279.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while FECCF trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs GEGYY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 242.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while GEGYY trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs OILSF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 242.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while OILSF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and OILSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs GEGYF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 233.76M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while GEGYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and GEGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs ZNOG Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 219.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while ZNOG trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -19.91. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs TUWOY Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 217.67M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while TUWOY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs EXCE Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 215.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while EXCE trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and EXCE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs ITEEF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.45M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs CRNZF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs HZNFF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 195.04M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while HZNFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and HZNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs PSHIF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.35M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs HRCXF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 183.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and HRCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs GASXF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 177.61M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while GASXF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and GASXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs RECWF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and RECWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs IPOOF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 160.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while IPOOF trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs EEGUF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 157.38M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while EEGUF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and EEGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs ALVOF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 156.43M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while ALVOF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs PNWRF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.70M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs KGEIF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 154.96M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs PIFYF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 145.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while PIFYF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs SEUSF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 143.76M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while SEUSF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs CVONF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 143.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while CVONF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs SLGYF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 134.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and SLGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs LNDNF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 125.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while LNDNF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs STGAF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, STGAF has a market cap of 125.74M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while STGAF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGAF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STGAF's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF and STGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PCOGF vs HMENF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, HMENF has a market cap of 121.77M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while HMENF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMENF's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HMENF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to HMENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.
PCOGF vs RUBLF Comparison
PCOGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCOGF stands at 81.37M. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 120.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PCOGF is priced at $0.01, while RUBLF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCOGF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, PCOGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PCOGF is less volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCOGF.