Nautilus Minerals Inc.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 49.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FNLPF trades at $13.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 71.63. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 9.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ANGPY trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while IMPUY trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while OICT trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -34.13. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and OICT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while IMPUF trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TFPM trades at $21.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is -196.45. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and NMPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BVN trades at $14.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GMINF trades at $14.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while JINFF trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and JINFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SILV trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while POYYF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and POYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PPTA trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -68.18. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GATO trades at $14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 905.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while EXK trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -26.54. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 892.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ZMPLF trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MMX trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 567.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SLSR trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLSR's ROE of -14.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477.01M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NSR trades at $7.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 413.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GLGDF trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 126.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 406.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MUX trades at $7.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 336.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ASM trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 285.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ITRG trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 271.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MTA trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -48.92. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 269.14M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ABBRF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 257.41M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GROY trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -75.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 225.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GOTRF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 191.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NEWP trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -37.17. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 166.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SAPLF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and SAPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 166.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BRVMF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -83.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 157.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while VOXR trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -103.67. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 138.61M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PAASF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 132.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while IAUFF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and IAUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 122.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PLG trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 112.96M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while LUCRF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 112.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BOCOF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 81.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SLVTF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 80.62M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SDRC trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -215.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 77.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PLLHF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while INMNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and INMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 74.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ATLX trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 72.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ACRG trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and ACRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 72.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PDLMF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 72.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BKRRF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 62.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TSORF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 58.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ARRKF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 57.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while XANAF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 53.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DNRSF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 53.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FREDF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 51.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ORVMF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 51.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while OCGSF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 50.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CHPGF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -24.63. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 50.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SMDRF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 46.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SSVFF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 46.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DNCVF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and DNCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 44.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while VLMGF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -40.18. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 38.08M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while EMPYF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 38.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PDIV trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and HMRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 35.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TEUTF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 35.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MMNGF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -19.63. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 34.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GROY-WT trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 33.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SCTSF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.83M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 31.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CAPTF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -31.76. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 31.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ADYRF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 30.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ACKRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 27.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DYNR trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and DYNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while WEXPF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 25.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SSVRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.61M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 25.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while HGLD trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and HGLD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 25.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while WAMFF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and WAMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 24.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while EQMEF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 24.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while KDKCF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and KDKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 24.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and AGLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 23.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while EMPPF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 23.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NAUFF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 23.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TBXXF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 23.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GMDMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and GMDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 21.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BBBXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 21.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MRZLF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while URVNF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 20.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CJIMF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MERG trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 19.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PVGDF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 19.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AUCUF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 18.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 18.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CTMCF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 18.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BYRG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and BYRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 17.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SMOFF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +74.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 17.66M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ELRFF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and ELRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.75M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 16.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BRGC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 16.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 16.08M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ESGLF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 15.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 14.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ATEPF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 14.64M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RKHNF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 13.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GBRRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and GBRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 13.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while LBCMF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 13.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SUNPF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and SUNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 13.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SNNGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FSTTF has a market cap of 12.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FSTTF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTTF's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTF's ROE of +11.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AKEMF has a market cap of 12.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AKEMF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKEMF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKEMF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AKEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BWCGF has a market cap of 12.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BWCGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWCGF's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BWCGF's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to BWCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 12.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MHTZF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 11.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while KGFMF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and KGFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TSLVF has a market cap of 11.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TSLVF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSLVF's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSLVF's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TSLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CNRIF has a market cap of 11.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CNRIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNRIF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNRIF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CNRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FYMNF has a market cap of 11.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FYMNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYMNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FYMNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FYMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 11.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while STRFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STRFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and STRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 11.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while THMG trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THMG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, HEXPF has a market cap of 10.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while HEXPF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEXPF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HEXPF's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and HEXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MPVDF has a market cap of 10.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MPVDF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPVDF's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPVDF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MPVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RVSDF has a market cap of 10.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RVSDF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVSDF's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RVSDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and RVSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 10.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while LGCXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 9.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AGMRF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MLRKF has a market cap of 9.70M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MLRKF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLRKF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLRKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and MLRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AHNMF has a market cap of 9.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AHNMF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHNMF's P/E ratio is -22.11. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AHNMF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and AHNMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 9.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while VTXXF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and VTXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 9.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PGLDF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 9.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PNTRF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 9.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while HEGLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, QGLDF has a market cap of 8.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while QGLDF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QGLDF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QGLDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to QGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AHNR has a market cap of 8.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AHNR trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHNR's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AHNR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CMAUF has a market cap of 7.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CMAUF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAUF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMAUF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CMAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 7.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SBMCF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SBLRF has a market cap of 7.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SBLRF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBLRF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBLRF's ROE of +4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SBLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CLRMF has a market cap of 7.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CLRMF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLRMF's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLRMF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CLRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FPVTF has a market cap of 6.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FPVTF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPVTF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPVTF's ROE of +2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FPVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MXROF has a market cap of 6.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MXROF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXROF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXROF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DDIAF has a market cap of 6.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DDIAF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDIAF's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDIAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and DDIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BDGCF has a market cap of 5.95M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BDGCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDGCF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDGCF's ROE of -729.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and BDGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PTNUF has a market cap of 5.93M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PTNUF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNUF's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTNUF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and PTNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 5.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while HBEIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of +19.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RIINF has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RIINF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIINF's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and RIINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SILS has a market cap of 5.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SILS trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SILS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SILS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SILS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NMEX has a market cap of 5.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NMEX trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMEX's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to NMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NOCSF has a market cap of 5.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NOCSF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOCSF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOCSF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and NOCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MAGE has a market cap of 5.01M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MAGE trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAGE's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAGE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MAGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TSDRF has a market cap of 4.96M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TSDRF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSDRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSDRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TSDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RGXTF has a market cap of 4.95M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RGXTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGXTF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGXTF's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to RGXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, COSRF has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while COSRF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COSRF's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to COSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AMNP trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and AMNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TARSF has a market cap of 4.65M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TARSF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TARSF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TARSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TARSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BELDF has a market cap of 4.61M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BELDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BELDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to BELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SLRRF has a market cap of 4.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SLRRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLRRF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLRRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SLRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NBRI has a market cap of 4.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NBRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NBRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to NBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RLYGF has a market cap of 4.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RLYGF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLYGF's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLYGF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to RLYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PLLMF has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PLLMF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLLMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and PLLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, BXXRF has a market cap of 4.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while BXXRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXXRF's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BXXRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to BXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MXTLF has a market cap of 4.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MXTLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXTLF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXTLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MXTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, LECRF has a market cap of 3.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while LECRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LECRF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LECRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to LECRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NHAWF has a market cap of 3.93M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NHAWF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHAWF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHAWF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to NHAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GGLXF has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GGLXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLXF's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLXF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 3.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RITE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RITE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DRIFF has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DRIFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRIFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and DRIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SRGZ has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SRGZ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRGZ's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and SRGZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RJKAF has a market cap of 3.41M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RJKAF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJKAF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RJKAF's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and RJKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GORIF has a market cap of 3.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GORIF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORIF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GORIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GORIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GLHRF has a market cap of 3.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GLHRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLHRF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLHRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and GLHRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 3.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while VIPRF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, VIZNF has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while VIZNF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIZNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIZNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and VIZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NCMBF has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NCMBF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMBF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCMBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to NCMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MNMRF has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MNMRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNMRF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNMRF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MNMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SWYDF has a market cap of 3.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SWYDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWYDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWYDF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and SWYDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GIDMF has a market cap of 3.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GIDMF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIDMF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIDMF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GIDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, OLVRF has a market cap of 3.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while OLVRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLVRF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OLVRF's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to OLVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, VMSSF has a market cap of 2.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while VMSSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMSSF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMSSF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and VMSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, XTRRF has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while XTRRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTRRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTRRF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to XTRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CFTN has a market cap of 2.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CFTN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFTN's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFTN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CFTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CGDXF has a market cap of 2.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CGDXF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGDXF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGDXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and CGDXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, COCCF has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while COCCF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COCCF's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COCCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and COCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CWVWF has a market cap of 2.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CWVWF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWVWF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWVWF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CWVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GNYPF has a market cap of 2.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GNYPF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNYPF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNYPF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and GNYPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FNGGF has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FNGGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGGF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FMNJ has a market cap of 2.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FMNJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMNJ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FMNJ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FMNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ENDMF has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ENDMF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENDMF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENDMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ENDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SWLFF has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SWLFF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWLFF's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWLFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SWLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AUMN trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUMN's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, STNRF has a market cap of 2.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while STNRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNRF's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STNRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to STNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CROOF has a market cap of 2.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CROOF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CROOF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CROOF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and CROOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DIOSF has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DIOSF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIOSF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIOSF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to DIOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MONGF has a market cap of 2.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MONGF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONGF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MONGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GDPHF has a market cap of 2.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GDPHF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDPHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDPHF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and GDPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, USHAF has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while USHAF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USHAF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USHAF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to USHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GSRCF has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GSRCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSRCF's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSRCF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GSRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AXDDF has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AXDDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXDDF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AXDDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AXDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DFIFF has a market cap of 1.93M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DFIFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFIFF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFIFF's ROE of +28.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to DFIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TRSFF has a market cap of 1.83M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TRSFF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRSFF's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRSFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and TRSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AUCCF has a market cap of 1.83M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AUCCF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUCCF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUCCF's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ASDZF has a market cap of 1.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ASDZF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASDZF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASDZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and ASDZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MTLCF has a market cap of 1.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MTLCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTLCF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTLCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and MTLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GEMZ has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GEMZ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEMZ's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GEMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DMIFF has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DMIFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMIFF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMIFF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to DMIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CHELF has a market cap of 1.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CHELF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHELF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHELF's ROE of -15.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, OGGNF has a market cap of 1.65M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while OGGNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGGNF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OGGNF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to OGGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PEXZF has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PEXZF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXZF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEXZF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PEXZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CMCXF has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CMCXF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCXF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMCXF's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and CMCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CHKKF has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CHKKF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKKF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHKKF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and CHKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FBSGF has a market cap of 1.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FBSGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBSGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBSGF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FBSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MSTXF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MSTXF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSTXF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSTXF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PBMFF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PBMFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBMFF's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBMFF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PBMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MBYMF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MBYMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBYMF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBYMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and MBYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PSRVF has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PSRVF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSRVF's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSRVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and PSRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MGLDF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MGLDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGLDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGLDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and MGLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MMMRF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MMMRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMMRF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMMRF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and MMMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MSLVF has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MSLVF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSLVF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSLVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MSLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NWHAF has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NWHAF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWHAF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NWHAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and NWHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DDNFF has a market cap of 1.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DDNFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDNFF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDNFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and DDNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GMEI has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GMEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GMEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SVGAF has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SVGAF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVGAF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVGAF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SVGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ETFLF has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ETFLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETFLF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETFLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ETFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, JDNRF has a market cap of 1.05M. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while JDNRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDNRF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to JDNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, EMLL has a market cap of 973666.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while EMLL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMLL's ROE of +14.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to EMLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CMILF has a market cap of 967689.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CMILF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMILF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMILF's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CMILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, KGSSF has a market cap of 945195.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while KGSSF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGSSF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KGSSF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and KGSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MEXGF has a market cap of 883201.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MEXGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEXGF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEXGF's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and MEXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TNGMF has a market cap of 874134.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TNGMF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNGMF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNGMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TNGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, WSRUF has a market cap of 833628.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while WSRUF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and WSRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DSCVF has a market cap of 831085.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DSCVF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSCVF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSCVF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and DSCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, IFAM has a market cap of 685605.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while IFAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFAM's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and IFAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MCKRF has a market cap of 680823.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MCKRF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCKRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCKRF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FBCPF has a market cap of 678542.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FBCPF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBCPF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBCPF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, KGHZF has a market cap of 671862.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while KGHZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGHZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KGHZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and KGHZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RMDFF has a market cap of 632332.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RMDFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMDFF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMDFF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to RMDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, EMSKF has a market cap of 610448.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while EMSKF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSKF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMSKF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to EMSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ORAGF has a market cap of 527331.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ORAGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAGF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORAGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and ORAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DSCR has a market cap of 498691.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DSCR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSCR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and DSCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GGSM has a market cap of 435334.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GGSM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGSM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GGSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SSRSF has a market cap of 433218.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SSRSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRSF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSRSF's ROE of -20.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to SSRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PMMEF has a market cap of 421977.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PMMEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMMEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMMEF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PMMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ANGCF has a market cap of 401429.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ANGCF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGCF's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANGCF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ANGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, HWKDF has a market cap of 399420.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while HWKDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWKDF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWKDF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to HWKDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, THRA has a market cap of 392118.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while THRA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to THRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MXSG has a market cap of 330411.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MXSG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXSG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and MXSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, LNXGF has a market cap of 198566.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while LNXGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNXGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LNXGF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to LNXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, NATUF has a market cap of 190497.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while NATUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NATUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to NATUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ECPN has a market cap of 175104.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ECPN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECPN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ECPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CGLD has a market cap of 130767.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CGLD trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGLD's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGLD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and CGLD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PVEN has a market cap of 126000.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PVEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PVEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to PVEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TRRI has a market cap of 106874.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TRRI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRRI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ESGI has a market cap of 57664.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ESGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ESGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GDPEF has a market cap of 52437.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GDPEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDPEF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDPEF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GDPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, AZGFF has a market cap of 35811.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while AZGFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZGFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZGFF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to AZGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, IPMG has a market cap of 32525.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while IPMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to IPMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ABZUF has a market cap of 28511.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ABZUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZUF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABZUF's ROE of -5.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ABZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RYMM has a market cap of 24640.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RYMM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYMM's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to RYMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, EVBC has a market cap of 17034.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while EVBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to EVBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, PGVI has a market cap of 8782.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while PGVI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and PGVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TFZI has a market cap of 8756.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TFZI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and TFZI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GRYEF has a market cap of 8595.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GRYEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRYEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRYEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GRYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MAOMF has a market cap of 8481.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MAOMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAOMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAOMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to MAOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, VIPV has a market cap of 6069.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while VIPV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to VIPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, IGRU has a market cap of 5106.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while IGRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to IGRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, HLLXF has a market cap of 4654.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while HLLXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLLXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to HLLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, HMZMF has a market cap of 1870.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while HMZMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMZMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMZMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and HMZMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, GARQF has a market cap of 1622.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while GARQF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GARQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GARQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to GARQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, FMGDF has a market cap of 1463.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while FMGDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMGDF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FMGDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to FMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MTTGF has a market cap of 1296.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MTTGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTTGF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and MTTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TMBXF has a market cap of 1221.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TMBXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMBXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMBXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and TMBXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CADIF has a market cap of 503.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CADIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CADIF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CADIF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and CADIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, RVNG has a market cap of 352.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while RVNG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVNG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RVNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to RVNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, HSHL has a market cap of 246.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while HSHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and HSHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TTXP has a market cap of 191.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TTXP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTXP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTXP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and TTXP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, SELSF has a market cap of 117.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while SELSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SELSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SELSF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and SELSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, ZNXT has a market cap of 100.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while ZNXT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNXT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZNXT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to ZNXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, INFX has a market cap of 25.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while INFX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFX's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and INFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, MSLM has a market cap of 7.00. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while MSLM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSLM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and MSLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, VOXCF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while VOXCF trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOXCF's P/E ratio is -23.07. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOXCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to VOXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, DNRSD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while DNRSD trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNRSD's P/E ratio is 0.96. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNRSD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF and DNRSD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, CRTID comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while CRTID trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTID's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRTID's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to CRTID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.

NUSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUSMF stands at 683.00. In comparison, TRQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NUSMF is priced at $0.00, while TRQ trades at $31.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, NUSMF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUSMF is less volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUSMF.