Nutrien Ltd.

NTR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR.TO stands at 39.54B. In comparison, NPK.TO has a market cap of 25.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR.TO is priced at $80.93, while NPK.TO trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 54.68, whereas NPK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, NTR.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NPK.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR.TO is less volatile compared to NPK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.TO.

NTR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR.TO stands at 39.54B. In comparison, ERTH.CN has a market cap of 12.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR.TO is priced at $80.93, while ERTH.CN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 54.68, whereas ERTH.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NTR.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ERTH.CN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR.TO is less volatile compared to ERTH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.TO.

NTR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR.TO stands at 39.54B. In comparison, KRN.TO has a market cap of 7.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR.TO is priced at $80.93, while KRN.TO trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 54.68, whereas KRN.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NTR.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KRN.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR.TO is less volatile compared to KRN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.TO.

NTR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR.TO stands at 39.54B. In comparison, BEE.CN has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR.TO is priced at $80.93, while BEE.CN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 54.68, whereas BEE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, NTR.TO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BEE.CN's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR.TO is more volatile compared to BEE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.TO.