Northern Potash Co.
Northern Potash Co. NPTH Peers
See (NPTH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPTH | $0.00 | -0.00% | 27324.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.27 | +0.10% | 128.26B | 11.28 | $2.24 | +4.91% |
| RTNTF | $78.61 | -0.06% | 108.44B | 11.12 | $7.07 | +2.99% |
| RTPPF | $57.54 | -3.13% | 98.63B | 8.14 | $7.07 | +6.99% |
| GLCNF | $3.64 | +0.82% | 43.74B | -28.00 | -$0.13 | +3.16% |
| GLNCY | $7.16 | -0.97% | 43.02B | -27.54 | -$0.26 | +3.00% |
| GMBXF | $5.17 | -0.58% | 40.25B | 11.24 | $0.46 | +2.36% |
| NGLOY | $14.31 | -1.51% | 34.73B | -11.27 | -$1.27 | +2.24% |
| AAUKF | $27.71 | -1.11% | 33.62B | -10.95 | -$2.53 | +2.29% |
| FSUGY | $21.80 | +0.11% | 33.50B | 8.61 | $2.53 | +8.33% |
Stock Comparison
NPTH vs BHPLF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while BHPLF trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs RTNTF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 108.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while RTNTF trades at $78.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs RTPPF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.63B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while RTPPF trades at $57.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs GLCNF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 43.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while GLCNF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs GLNCY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 43.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while GLNCY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.54. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs GMBXF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 40.25B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while GMBXF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and GMBXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs NGLOY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while NGLOY trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs AAUKF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while AAUKF trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs FSUGY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 33.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while FSUGY trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs FSUMF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 33.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while FSUMF trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs CMCLF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while CMCLF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs TCKRF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs IVPAF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 13.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while IVPAF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs SHTLF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs BOLIF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs BDNNY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.20B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while BDNNY trades at $64.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs JXMNF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs IPOAF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while IPOAF trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 113.83. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs ABML Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs SMMYY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while SMMYY trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 55.10. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs STMNF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs PUTKF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs PUTKY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while PUTKY trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs NILSY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs LYSCF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while LYSCF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 160.65. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs LYSDY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while LYSDY trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs PAEKY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs WYCC Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while WYCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and WYCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs MALRY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MALRY trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs PILBF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while PILBF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs FLMMF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs CHZQ Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs MIMTF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs IPGDF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs AZZVF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs MALRF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs DWMNF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs IIDDY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs NGXXF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while NGXXF trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs SOUHY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while SOUHY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.73. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs ERMAY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ERMAY trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 97.67. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs ERMAF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs LLLAF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while LLLAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and LLLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs PTNDY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs NICMF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while NICMF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs AFBOF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs PTNDF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs DETRF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while DETRF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs LINRF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while LINRF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs ILKAY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ILKAY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs ILKAF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ILKAF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs AZRMF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs BQSSF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while BQSSF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.75. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs FMCXF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 925.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while FMCXF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -54.97. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs STTSY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs ADTLF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 894.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ADTLF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs ATUSF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 892.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ATUSF trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs AUSDF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs ADMLF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 873.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ADMLF trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.65. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs JMXXF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs AFMJF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 848.74M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs AMVMF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 742.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while AMVMF trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -60.58. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs VULNF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 704.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while VULNF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs NCKAF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 639.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while NCKAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs MFRVF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs CTJHF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs TAOFF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs ALMTF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 506.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ALMTF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -44.25. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs TTNNF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs OSTTF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs MJDLF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 475.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MJDLF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and MJDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs MCRZF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs BIRNF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs NQMIY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs PXMFF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs REEMF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 376.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while REEMF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs MCHHF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs CTJHY Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs FGOVF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 349.14M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while FGOVF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -66.07. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs MNXMF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 344.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MNXMF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs ERLFF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 340.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ERLFF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.87. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs KMRPF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs MLYF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.41M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs AUMTF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs LTSRF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 302.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs SLGGF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs MLXEF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 292.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while MLXEF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs SVMLF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 290.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while SVMLF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -44.96. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs ARAFF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 290.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs CGMLF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 282.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while CGMLF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.15. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs LRSRF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs FWEDF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 260.08M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while FWEDF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs PMETF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 254.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while PMETF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs STQNF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs SYAAF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 248.05M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while SYAAF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs RXRLF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs LTHHF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NPTH vs BSRUF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.
NPTH vs PTTMF Comparison
NPTH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPTH stands at 27324.00. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NPTH is priced at $0.00, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPTH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, NPTH's ROE is N/A, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPTH is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPTH.