Neuberger Berman MLP and Energy Income Fund Inc.
Neuberger Berman MLP and Energy Income Fund Inc. NML Peers
See (NML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NML | $8.43 | +0.06% | 477.63M | 2.80 | $3.01 | +8.30% |
| PONPX | $10.52 | +0.19% | 181.08B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PIMIX | $10.52 | +0.19% | 181.08B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PONAX | $10.52 | +0.19% | 181.08B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RIDGX | $25.83 | -0.12% | 127.45B | 18.74 | $1.38 | N/A |
| IFAFX | $25.72 | -0.12% | 127.45B | 18.74 | $1.37 | +3.82% |
| AMECX | $25.81 | -0.12% | 127.30B | 18.73 | $1.38 | +3.87% |
| CWGIX | $67.11 | -0.06% | 122.85B | 21.84 | $3.07 | N/A |
| RWICX | $66.50 | -0.06% | 122.85B | 21.83 | $3.05 | N/A |
| CWGFX | $66.91 | -0.06% | 122.78B | 21.83 | $3.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NML vs PONPX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PONPX has a market cap of 181.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PONPX trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PONPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PONPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PONPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs PIMIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PIMIX has a market cap of 181.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PIMIX trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PIMIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PIMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PIMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs PONAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PONAX has a market cap of 181.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PONAX trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PONAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PONAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PONAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs RIDGX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, RIDGX has a market cap of 127.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while RIDGX trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RIDGX's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RIDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to RIDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs IFAFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, IFAFX has a market cap of 127.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while IFAFX trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas IFAFX's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IFAFX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to IFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs AMECX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, AMECX has a market cap of 127.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while AMECX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AMECX's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMECX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to AMECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs CWGIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, CWGIX has a market cap of 122.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while CWGIX trades at $67.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CWGIX's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CWGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to CWGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs RWICX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, RWICX has a market cap of 122.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while RWICX trades at $66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RWICX's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RWICX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to RWICX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs CWGFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, CWGFX has a market cap of 122.78B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while CWGFX trades at $66.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CWGFX's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CWGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to CWGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs CWIAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, CWIAX has a market cap of 122.78B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while CWIAX trades at $66.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CWIAX's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CWIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to CWIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs CIRAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, CIRAX has a market cap of 109.35B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while CIRAX trades at $73.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CIRAX's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CIRAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to CIRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs CIBFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, CIBFX has a market cap of 109.35B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while CIBFX trades at $73.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CIBFX's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CIBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to CIBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs CAIBX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, CAIBX has a market cap of 109.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while CAIBX trades at $73.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CAIBX's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAIBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to CAIBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs RIRGX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, RIRGX has a market cap of 109.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while RIRGX trades at $73.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RIRGX's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RIRGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to RIRGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs DODIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, DODIX has a market cap of 94.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while DODIX trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DODIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DODIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to DODIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FKINX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FKINX has a market cap of 79.63B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FKINX trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FKINX's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FKINX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FKINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FNCFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FNCFX has a market cap of 79.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FNCFX trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FNCFX's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FNCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FNCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs VEIRX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, VEIRX has a market cap of 55.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while VEIRX trades at $89.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VEIRX's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VEIRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to VEIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs VEIPX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, VEIPX has a market cap of 55.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while VEIPX trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VEIPX's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VEIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to VEIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs VWINX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, VWINX has a market cap of 48.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while VWINX trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VWINX's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VWINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to VWINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs VWIAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, VWIAX has a market cap of 48.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while VWIAX trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VWIAX's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VWIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to VWIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs LDLVX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, LDLVX has a market cap of 42.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while LDLVX trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LDLVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LDLVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to LDLVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs LLDYX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, LLDYX has a market cap of 42.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while LLDYX trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LLDYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LLDYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to LLDYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HLIEX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HLIEX has a market cap of 41.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HLIEX trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HLIEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HLIEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HLIEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs OIEJX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, OIEJX has a market cap of 41.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while OIEJX trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas OIEJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OIEJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to OIEJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JEPI Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JEPI has a market cap of 38.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JEPI trades at $55.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JEPI's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JEPI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs VTINX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, VTINX has a market cap of 34.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while VTINX trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VTINX's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VTINX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to VTINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JPST Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JPST has a market cap of 30.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JPST trades at $50.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JPST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JEPQ Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JEPQ has a market cap of 24.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JEPQ trades at $52.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JEPQ's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JEPQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JEPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs AHTFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, AHTFX has a market cap of 23.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while AHTFX trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AHTFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AHTFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to AHTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs PRFDX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PRFDX has a market cap of 22.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PRFDX trades at $35.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PRFDX's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRFDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PRFDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TIBIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TIBIX has a market cap of 20.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TIBIX trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TIBIX's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TIBIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TIBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TIBMX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TIBMX has a market cap of 20.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TIBMX trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TIBMX's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TIBMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TIBMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TIBGX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TIBGX has a market cap of 19.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TIBGX trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TIBGX's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TIBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TIBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TIBAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TIBAX has a market cap of 19.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TIBAX trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TIBAX's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TIBRX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TIBRX has a market cap of 19.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TIBRX trades at $28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TIBRX's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TIBRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TIBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TIBCX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TIBCX has a market cap of 19.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TIBCX trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TIBCX's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TIBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TIBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs GAIFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, GAIFX has a market cap of 18.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while GAIFX trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GAIFX's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GAIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to GAIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs MIAWX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, MIAWX has a market cap of 17.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while MIAWX trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MIAWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MIAWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to MIAWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs COSIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, COSIX has a market cap of 16.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while COSIX trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas COSIX's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to COSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to COSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs IGIFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, IGIFX has a market cap of 16.04B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while IGIFX trades at $41.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas IGIFX's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IGIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to IGIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs PRCIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PRCIX has a market cap of 15.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PRCIX trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PRCIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PRCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs PRXEX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PRXEX has a market cap of 15.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PRXEX trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PRXEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRXEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PRXEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs VQNPX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, VQNPX has a market cap of 14.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while VQNPX trades at $62.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VQNPX's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VQNPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to VQNPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs VGIAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, VGIAX has a market cap of 14.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while VGIAX trades at $101.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VGIAX's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VGIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to VGIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FFRHX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FFRHX has a market cap of 14.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FFRHX trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FFRHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FFRHX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FFRHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FADMX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FADMX has a market cap of 14.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FADMX trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FADMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FADMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FADMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs BLPFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, BLPFX has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while BLPFX trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BLPFX's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BLPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to BLPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FAGIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FAGIX has a market cap of 13.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FAGIX trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FAGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FAGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FAGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FLTMX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FLTMX has a market cap of 12.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FLTMX trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FLTMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLTMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FLTMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs PFIIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PFIIX has a market cap of 12.52B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PFIIX trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PFIIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PFIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PFIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs PFIAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PFIAX has a market cap of 12.52B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PFIAX trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PFIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PFIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PFIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs ABHFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, ABHFX has a market cap of 12.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while ABHFX trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ABHFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to ABHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs ACEIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, ACEIX has a market cap of 11.69B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while ACEIX trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ACEIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ACEIX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to ACEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HBLRX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HBLRX has a market cap of 11.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HBLRX trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HBLRX's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HBLRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HBLRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HBLVX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HBLVX has a market cap of 11.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HBLVX trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HBLVX's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HBLVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HBLVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HBLTX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HBLTX has a market cap of 11.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HBLTX trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HBLTX's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FGRIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FGRIX has a market cap of 11.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FGRIX trades at $63.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FGRIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FGRIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FGRIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JSOAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JSOAX has a market cap of 10.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JSOAX trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JSOAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JSOAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JSOAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TSIIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TSIIX has a market cap of 9.52B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TSIIX trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TSIIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TSIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TSIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs ESIIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, ESIIX has a market cap of 9.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while ESIIX trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ESIIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ESIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to ESIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FEQIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FEQIX has a market cap of 8.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FEQIX trades at $75.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FEQIX's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FEQIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FEQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs PQIAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PQIAX has a market cap of 8.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PQIAX trades at $39.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PQIAX's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PQIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PQIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs INPFX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, INPFX has a market cap of 8.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while INPFX trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas INPFX's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to INPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FZOLX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FZOLX has a market cap of 7.76B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FZOLX trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FZOLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FZOLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FZOLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs CPXAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, CPXAX has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while CPXAX trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CPXAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CPXAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to CPXAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs PDI Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, PDI has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while PDI trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PDI's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PDI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to PDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JDNAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JDNAX has a market cap of 6.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JDNAX trades at $70.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JDNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JDNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JDNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JDNNX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JDNNX has a market cap of 6.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JDNNX trades at $70.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JDNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JDNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JDNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JGINX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JGINX has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JGINX trades at $70.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JGINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JGINX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JGINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JAGIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JAGIX has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JAGIX trades at $70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JAGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JAGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JAGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JADGX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JADGX has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JADGX trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JADGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JADGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JADGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JDNRX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JDNRX has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JDNRX trades at $69.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JDNRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JDNRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JDNRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JGICX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JGICX has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JGICX trades at $68.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JGICX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JGICX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JGICX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs AEUDX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, AEUDX has a market cap of 6.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while AEUDX trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AEUDX's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AEUDX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to AEUDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TWEIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TWEIX has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TWEIX trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TWEIX's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TWEIX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TWEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs DFCF Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, DFCF has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while DFCF trades at $41.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DFCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DFCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to DFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TRGIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TRGIX has a market cap of 6.40B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TRGIX trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TRGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TRGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TRGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TGIHX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TGIHX has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TGIHX trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TGIHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TGIHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TGIHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs DLFNX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, DLFNX has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while DLFNX trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DLFNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DLFNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to DLFNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs TIIRX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, TIIRX has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while TIIRX trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TIIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TIIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to TIIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FCONX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FCONX has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FCONX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FCONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FCONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FCONX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JEPAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JEPAX has a market cap of 6.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JEPAX trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JEPAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JEPAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JEPAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs NSTLX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, NSTLX has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while NSTLX trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NSTLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NSTLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to NSTLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs OAKBX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, OAKBX has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while OAKBX trades at $35.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas OAKBX's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OAKBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to OAKBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HFQIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HFQIX has a market cap of 5.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HFQIX trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HFQIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HFQIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HFQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HFQCX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HFQCX has a market cap of 5.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HFQCX trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HFQCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HFQCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HFQCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HFQSX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HFQSX has a market cap of 5.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HFQSX trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HFQSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HFQSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HFQSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HFQAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HFQAX has a market cap of 5.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HFQAX trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HFQAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HFQAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HFQAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HFQRX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HFQRX has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HFQRX trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HFQRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HFQRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HFQRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs HFQTX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, HFQTX has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while HFQTX trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HFQTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HFQTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to HFQTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs DFIGX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, DFIGX has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while DFIGX trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DFIGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DFIGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to DFIGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs RPSIX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, RPSIX has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while RPSIX trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RPSIX's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RPSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to RPSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FEQTX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FEQTX has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FEQTX trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FEQTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FEQTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FEQTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs FETKX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, FETKX has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while FETKX trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FETKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FETKX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to FETKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JMUSX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JMUSX has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JMUSX trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JMUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JMUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JMUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JMTNX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JMTNX has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JMTNX trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JMTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JMTNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JMTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JMUTX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JMUTX has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JMUTX trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JMUTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JMUTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JMUTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.
NML vs JMUAX Comparison
NML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NML stands at 477.63M. In comparison, JMUAX has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NML is priced at $8.43, while JMUAX trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NML currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JMUAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NML's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JMUAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NML is more volatile compared to JMUAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NML.