NEO Battery Materials Ltd.
NEO Battery Materials Ltd. NBMFF Peers
See (NBMFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBMFF | $0.51 | +2.66% | 61.09M | -17.09 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.31 | -3.83% | 123.35B | 10.85 | $2.24 | +5.10% |
| RTNTF | $78.98 | +0.47% | 109.54B | 11.16 | $7.08 | +2.98% |
| RTPPF | $61.20 | +6.35% | 105.03B | 8.66 | $7.07 | +6.57% |
| GLCNF | $3.53 | -3.02% | 42.42B | -27.15 | -$0.13 | +3.26% |
| GLNCY | $7.05 | -1.67% | 42.36B | -27.12 | -$0.26 | +3.06% |
| GMBXF | $5.35 | -2.55% | 41.65B | 11.63 | $0.46 | +2.42% |
| AAUKF | $27.71 | -1.04% | 33.62B | -10.95 | -$2.53 | +2.29% |
| FSUGY | $21.85 | +0.14% | 33.59B | 8.64 | $2.53 | +8.30% |
| NGLOY | $13.77 | -3.91% | 33.42B | -10.84 | -$1.27 | +2.32% |
Stock Comparison
NBMFF vs BHPLF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 123.35B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while BHPLF trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs RTNTF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 109.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while RTNTF trades at $78.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs RTPPF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while RTPPF trades at $61.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs GLCNF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.42B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while GLCNF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.15. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs GLNCY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.36B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while GLNCY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.12. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs GMBXF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while GMBXF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs AAUKF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while AAUKF trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs FSUGY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 33.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while FSUGY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs NGLOY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 33.42B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while NGLOY trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs FSUMF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 33.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while FSUMF trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs CMCLF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while CMCLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs TCKRF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.90B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs IVPAF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 13.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while IVPAF trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs SHTLF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs BOLIF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs BDNNY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while BDNNY trades at $63.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs JXMNF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs IPOAF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while IPOAF trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 113.83. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ABML Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs SMMYY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while SMMYY trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 55.10. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs STMNF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs PUTKF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs PUTKY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while PUTKY trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs NILSY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs LYSDY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while LYSDY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 162.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs LYSCF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while LYSCF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 161.33. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs PAEKY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MALRY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MALRY trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs PILBF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while PILBF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -99.67. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs FLMMF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs CHZQ Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MIMTF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs IPGDF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs AZZVF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MALRF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs DWMNF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs IIDDY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs NGXXF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while NGXXF trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs SOUHY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while SOUHY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.35. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ERMAY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ERMAY trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 97.67. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ERMAF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 99.56. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs PTNDY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs NICMF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while NICMF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs AFBOF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs PTNDF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs DETRF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while DETRF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs LINRF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while LINRF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -51.82. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ILKAY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ILKAY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ILKAF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ILKAF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs AZRMF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs BQSSF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while BQSSF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -62.25. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs FMCXF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 921.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while FMCXF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -54.75. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs STTSY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ADTLF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 894.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ADTLF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ATUSF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 882.82M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ATUSF trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs AUSDF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs JMXXF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs AFMJF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 848.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ADMLF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 845.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ADMLF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs AMVMF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 709.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while AMVMF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -57.89. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs VULNF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 704.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while VULNF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs NCKAF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 630.74M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while NCKAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MFRVF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs CTJHF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs TAOFF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs TTNNF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs OSTTF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ALMTF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ALMTF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -42.75. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MJDLF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 476.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MJDLF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MCRZF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs BIRNF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs LLLAF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 387.48M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while LLLAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs NQMIY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs PXMFF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs REEMF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 376.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while REEMF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MCHHF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs FGOVF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 356.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while FGOVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -67.45. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs CTJHY Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MNXMF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 344.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MNXMF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ERLFF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 340.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ERLFF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.87. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs KMRPF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MLYF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 326.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs AUMTF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs SLGGF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ARAFF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs MLXEF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 292.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while MLXEF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs LTSRF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 279.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.81. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs CGMLF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 272.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while CGMLF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs SVMLF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 265.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while SVMLF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs SYAAF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 264.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while SYAAF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs FWEDF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 260.64M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while FWEDF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs LRSRF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs STQNF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs PMETF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 251.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while PMETF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -53.33. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs ERDCF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 242.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while ERDCF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -66.71. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs RXRLF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs LTHHF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs BSRUF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is more volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.
NBMFF vs PTTMF Comparison
NBMFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBMFF stands at 61.09M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NBMFF is priced at $0.51, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBMFF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.09, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, NBMFF's ROE is -2.55%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NBMFF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBMFF.