Narf Industries Plc
Narf Industries Plc NARF.L Peers
See (NARF.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NARF.L | $0.48 | +5.26% | 8.06M | -0.47 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FHP.L | $36,000.00 | N/A | 4.82T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ACG.L | $433.00 | -0.69% | 9.38B | -363.87 | -$1.19 | N/A |
| ADVT.L | $155.00 | +1.42% | 206.46M | 155.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| HPA1.L | $1,045.00 | +2.96% | 156.90M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NEOA.L | $1,395.00 | -2.11% | 87.47M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FINS.L | $1,000.00 | -3.85% | 69.29M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MAC2.L | $115.00 | N/A | 49.10M | -5.00 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| ONDO.L | $28.00 | -0.88% | 37.57M | -5.60 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| HMA1.L | $1,055.00 | +2.93% | 34.73M | -25.73 | -$0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NARF.L vs FHP.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, FHP.L has a market cap of 4.82T. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while FHP.L trades at $36,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas FHP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to FHP.L's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to FHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs ACG.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, ACG.L has a market cap of 9.38B. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while ACG.L trades at $433.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ACG.L's P/E ratio is -363.87. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to ACG.L's ROE of +140.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to ACG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs ADVT.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, ADVT.L has a market cap of 206.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while ADVT.L trades at $155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ADVT.L's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to ADVT.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to ADVT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs HPA1.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, HPA1.L has a market cap of 156.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while HPA1.L trades at $1,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas HPA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to HPA1.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to HPA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs NEOA.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, NEOA.L has a market cap of 87.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while NEOA.L trades at $1,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas NEOA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to NEOA.L's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to NEOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs FINS.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, FINS.L has a market cap of 69.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while FINS.L trades at $1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas FINS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to FINS.L's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NARF.L has daily volatility of 5.34 and FINS.L has daily volatility of N/A.
NARF.L vs MAC2.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, MAC2.L has a market cap of 49.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while MAC2.L trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MAC2.L's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to MAC2.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NARF.L has daily volatility of 5.34 and MAC2.L has daily volatility of N/A.
NARF.L vs ONDO.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, ONDO.L has a market cap of 37.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while ONDO.L trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ONDO.L's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to ONDO.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to ONDO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs HMA1.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, HMA1.L has a market cap of 34.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while HMA1.L trades at $1,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas HMA1.L's P/E ratio is -25.73. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to HMA1.L's ROE of +4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NARF.L has daily volatility of 5.34 and HMA1.L has daily volatility of N/A.
NARF.L vs MUST.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, MUST.L has a market cap of 19.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while MUST.L trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MUST.L's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to MUST.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to MUST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs ALK.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, ALK.L has a market cap of 13.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while ALK.L trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ALK.L's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to ALK.L's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to ALK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs KLSO.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, KLSO.L has a market cap of 8.83M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while KLSO.L trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas KLSO.L's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to KLSO.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to KLSO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs CRES.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, CRES.L has a market cap of 6.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while CRES.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CRES.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to CRES.L's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to CRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs BWN.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, BWN.L has a market cap of 6.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while BWN.L trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BWN.L's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to BWN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to BWN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs TMTA.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, TMTA.L has a market cap of 6.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while TMTA.L trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TMTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to TMTA.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to TMTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs EST.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, EST.L has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while EST.L trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas EST.L's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to EST.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to EST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs BAY.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, BAY.L has a market cap of 4.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while BAY.L trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BAY.L's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to BAY.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to BAY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs HNG.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, HNG.L has a market cap of 3.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while HNG.L trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas HNG.L's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to HNG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to HNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs ACPE.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, ACPE.L has a market cap of 3.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while ACPE.L trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ACPE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to ACPE.L's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to ACPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs GSC.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, GSC.L has a market cap of 2.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while GSC.L trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas GSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to GSC.L's ROE of +3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to GSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs REDC.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, REDC.L has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while REDC.L trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas REDC.L's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to REDC.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to REDC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs AJAX.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, AJAX.L has a market cap of 1.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while AJAX.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas AJAX.L's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to AJAX.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to AJAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs SCSP.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, SCSP.L has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while SCSP.L trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SCSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to SCSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to SCSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs MMM.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, MMM.L has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while MMM.L trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MMM.L's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to MMM.L's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to MMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs BION.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, BION.L has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while BION.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BION.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to BION.L's ROE of +20.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NARF.L has daily volatility of 5.34 and BION.L has daily volatility of N/A.
NARF.L vs BIH.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, BIH.L has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while BIH.L trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BIH.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to BIH.L's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to BIH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs TMOR.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, TMOR.L has a market cap of 967558.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while TMOR.L trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TMOR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to TMOR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to TMOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs FPP.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, FPP.L has a market cap of 915325.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while FPP.L trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas FPP.L's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to FPP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to FPP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs BRS.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, BRS.L has a market cap of 885248.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while BRS.L trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BRS.L's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to BRS.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to BRS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs AC8.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, AC8.L has a market cap of 750000.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while AC8.L trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas AC8.L's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to AC8.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to AC8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs AMOI.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, AMOI.L has a market cap of 706689.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while AMOI.L trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas AMOI.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to AMOI.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to AMOI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs ELEG.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, ELEG.L has a market cap of 617150.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while ELEG.L trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ELEG.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to ELEG.L's ROE of +2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to ELEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs PRIS.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, PRIS.L has a market cap of 602715.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while PRIS.L trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PRIS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to PRIS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to PRIS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs MII.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, MII.L has a market cap of 575000.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while MII.L trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MII.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to MII.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to MII.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs ASHI.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, ASHI.L has a market cap of 471886.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while ASHI.L trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ASHI.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to ASHI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to ASHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs ARA.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, ARA.L has a market cap of 446250.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while ARA.L trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ARA.L's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to ARA.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to ARA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs ROC.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, ROC.L has a market cap of 362663.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while ROC.L trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ROC.L's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to ROC.L's ROE of -5.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is less volatile compared to ROC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.
NARF.L vs HID.L Comparison
NARF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NARF.L stands at 8.06M. In comparison, HID.L has a market cap of 171333.00. Regarding current trading prices, NARF.L is priced at $0.48, while HID.L trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NARF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas HID.L's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, NARF.L's ROE is +43.95%, compared to HID.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NARF.L is more volatile compared to HID.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARF.L.