Nanoco Group plc
Nanoco Group plc NANO.L Peers
See (NANO.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANO.L | $12.85 | +1.18% | 25.01M | -12.85 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| 0YXG.L | $229.46 | -1.08% | 1.03T | 11.37 | $20.18 | +3.03% |
| 0R2H.L | $187.04 | -0.72% | 169.92B | 21.40 | $8.74 | +2.88% |
| 0HFN.L | $225.58 | -0.14% | 111.88B | 65.98 | $3.42 | +1.66% |
| 0JT5.L | $75.92 | +21.85% | 109.04B | 2.37 | $32.00 | +1.05% |
| 0JPO.L | $795.33 | +0.26% | 100.83B | 38.60 | $20.60 | +0.61% |
| 0R1A.L | $103.14 | N/A | 84.33B | 13.77 | $7.49 | +0.78% |
| 0EDE.L | $211.06 | -0.15% | 53.32B | 26.31 | $8.02 | +1.92% |
| 0K19.L | $61.13 | -2.15% | 32.88B | 26.93 | $2.27 | +2.99% |
| 0YAA.L | $792.30 | -0.38% | 20.87B | 220.27 | $3.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NANO.L vs 0YXG.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0YXG.L has a market cap of 1.03T. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0YXG.L trades at $229.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0YXG.L's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0YXG.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0YXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0R2H.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0R2H.L has a market cap of 169.92B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0R2H.L trades at $187.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0R2H.L's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0R2H.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0R2H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0HFN.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0HFN.L has a market cap of 111.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0HFN.L trades at $225.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0HFN.L's P/E ratio is 65.98. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0HFN.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0HFN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0JT5.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0JT5.L has a market cap of 109.04B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0JT5.L trades at $75.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0JT5.L's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0JT5.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0JT5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0JPO.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0JPO.L has a market cap of 100.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0JPO.L trades at $795.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0JPO.L's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0JPO.L's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0JPO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0R1A.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0R1A.L has a market cap of 84.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0R1A.L trades at $103.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0R1A.L's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0R1A.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0R1A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0EDE.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0EDE.L has a market cap of 53.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0EDE.L trades at $211.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0EDE.L's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0EDE.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0EDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0K19.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0K19.L has a market cap of 32.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0K19.L trades at $61.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0K19.L's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0K19.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0K19.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0YAA.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0YAA.L has a market cap of 20.87B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0YAA.L trades at $792.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0YAA.L's P/E ratio is 220.27. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0YAA.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0YAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0R06.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0R06.L has a market cap of 20.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0R06.L trades at $191.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0R06.L's P/E ratio is 94.82. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0R06.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0R06.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0KC4.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0KC4.L has a market cap of 18.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0KC4.L trades at $44.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0KC4.L's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0KC4.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0KC4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0LEF.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0LEF.L has a market cap of 13.64B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0LEF.L trades at $85.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0LEF.L's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0LEF.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0LEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0L77.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0L77.L has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0L77.L trades at $71.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0L77.L's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0L77.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0L77.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0KSJ.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0KSJ.L has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0KSJ.L trades at $78.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0KSJ.L's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0KSJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0KSJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0QYL.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0QYL.L has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0QYL.L trades at $56.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0QYL.L's P/E ratio is -138.18. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0QYL.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0QYL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0HYI.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0HYI.L has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0HYI.L trades at $107.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0HYI.L's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0HYI.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0HYI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0J9J.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0J9J.L has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0J9J.L trades at $120.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0J9J.L's P/E ratio is -56.21. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0J9J.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0J9J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0YU1.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0YU1.L has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0YU1.L trades at $60.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0YU1.L's P/E ratio is -84.69. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0YU1.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0YU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0J5H.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0J5H.L has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0J5H.L trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0J5H.L's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0J5H.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0J5H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs AWE.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, AWE.L has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while AWE.L trades at $144.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas AWE.L's P/E ratio is -36.17. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AWE.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to AWE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs OXIG.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, OXIG.L has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while OXIG.L trades at $1,886.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas OXIG.L's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OXIG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to OXIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0LID.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0LID.L has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0LID.L trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0LID.L's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0LID.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0LID.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0HGV.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0HGV.L has a market cap of 966.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0HGV.L trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0HGV.L's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0HGV.L's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is less volatile compared to 0HGV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0Q3C.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0Q3C.L has a market cap of 761.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0Q3C.L trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0Q3C.L's P/E ratio is 46.25. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0Q3C.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0Q3C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0ROZ.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0ROZ.L has a market cap of 705.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0ROZ.L trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0ROZ.L's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0ROZ.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0ROZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0QWC.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0QWC.L has a market cap of 681.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0QWC.L trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0QWC.L's P/E ratio is -98.29. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0QWC.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0QWC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0Q19.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0Q19.L has a market cap of 530.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0Q19.L trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0Q19.L's P/E ratio is 219.82. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0Q19.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0Q19.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0I4Q.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0I4Q.L has a market cap of 525.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0I4Q.L trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0I4Q.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0I4Q.L's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is less volatile compared to 0I4Q.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0NL1.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0NL1.L has a market cap of 381.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0NL1.L trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0NL1.L's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0NL1.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0NL1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0JRR.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0JRR.L has a market cap of 216.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0JRR.L trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0JRR.L's P/E ratio is -11.22. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0JRR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is less volatile compared to 0JRR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs IQE.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, IQE.L has a market cap of 107.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while IQE.L trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas IQE.L's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IQE.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is less volatile compared to IQE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0RF1.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0RF1.L has a market cap of 45.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0RF1.L trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0RF1.L's P/E ratio is -30.22. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0RF1.L's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to 0RF1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs CML.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, CML.L has a market cap of 39.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while CML.L trades at $250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas CML.L's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CML.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to CML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs ENSI.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, ENSI.L has a market cap of 33.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while ENSI.L trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas ENSI.L's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENSI.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is less volatile compared to ENSI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs 0J9O.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, 0J9O.L has a market cap of 7.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while 0J9O.L trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas 0J9O.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0J9O.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is less volatile compared to 0J9O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.
NANO.L vs SND.L Comparison
NANO.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NANO.L stands at 25.01M. In comparison, SND.L has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NANO.L is priced at $12.85, while SND.L trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NANO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -12.85, whereas SND.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NANO.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SND.L's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NANO.L is more volatile compared to SND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NANO.L.