Mulberry Group plc

MUL.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUL.L stands at 57.79M. In comparison, DOCS.L has a market cap of 556.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MUL.L is priced at $82.50, while DOCS.L trades at $57.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas DOCS.L's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, MUL.L's ROE is -3.67%, compared to DOCS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MUL.L is less volatile compared to DOCS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUL.L.

MUL.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUL.L stands at 57.79M. In comparison, 0RUJ.L has a market cap of 325.16M. Regarding current trading prices, MUL.L is priced at $82.50, while 0RUJ.L trades at $45.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas 0RUJ.L's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, MUL.L's ROE is -3.67%, compared to 0RUJ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUL.L is more volatile compared to 0RUJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUL.L.

MUL.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUL.L stands at 57.79M. In comparison, 0QP3.L has a market cap of 129.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MUL.L is priced at $82.50, while 0QP3.L trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas 0QP3.L's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, MUL.L's ROE is -3.67%, compared to 0QP3.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUL.L is more volatile compared to 0QP3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUL.L.

MUL.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUL.L stands at 57.79M. In comparison, PTD.L has a market cap of 786645.00. Regarding current trading prices, MUL.L is priced at $82.50, while PTD.L trades at $5.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas PTD.L's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, MUL.L's ROE is -3.67%, compared to PTD.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUL.L is more volatile compared to PTD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUL.L.