Mühlbauer Holding AG

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, NTA.DE has a market cap of 23.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while NTA.DE trades at $112.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas NTA.DE's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTA.DE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is more volatile compared to NTA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, 1IG.F has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while 1IG.F trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas 1IG.F's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1IG.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is less volatile compared to 1IG.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, KTN.DE has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while KTN.DE trades at $23.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas KTN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KTN.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is less volatile compared to KTN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, SANT.DE has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while SANT.DE trades at $15.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas SANT.DE's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANT.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is less volatile compared to SANT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, JY0.F has a market cap of 292.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while JY0.F trades at $36.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas JY0.F's P/E ratio is -16.79. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JY0.F's ROE of -4.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is less volatile compared to JY0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, SYV.DE has a market cap of 281.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while SYV.DE trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas SYV.DE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYV.DE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is less volatile compared to SYV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, HYI.F has a market cap of 22.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while HYI.F trades at $4.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas HYI.F's P/E ratio is -47.20. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYI.F's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is more volatile compared to HYI.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, C3RY.DE has a market cap of 20.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while C3RY.DE trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas C3RY.DE's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C3RY.DE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is less volatile compared to C3RY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, TUR.F has a market cap of 8.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while TUR.F trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas TUR.F's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TUR.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is more volatile compared to TUR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.

MUB.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUB.DE stands at 613.09M. In comparison, NXR.DE has a market cap of 927479.00. Regarding current trading prices, MUB.DE is priced at $43.20, while NXR.DE trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUB.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.55, whereas NXR.DE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MUB.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NXR.DE's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MUB.DE is more volatile compared to NXR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUB.DE.