Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, CAR-UN.TO has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while CAR-UN.TO trades at $42.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas CAR-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CAR-UN.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is less volatile compared to CAR-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, BEI-UN.TO has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while BEI-UN.TO trades at $66.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas BEI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BEI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is less volatile compared to BEI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, KMP-UN.TO has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while KMP-UN.TO trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas KMP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to KMP-UN.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is less volatile compared to KMP-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, IIP-UN.TO has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while IIP-UN.TO trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas IIP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to IIP-UN.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is less volatile compared to IIP-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, HOM-UN.TO has a market cap of 987.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while HOM-UN.TO trades at $18.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas HOM-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HOM-UN.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is less volatile compared to HOM-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, MRG-UN.TO has a market cap of 628.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while MRG-UN.TO trades at $17.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MRG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MRG-UN.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is more volatile compared to MRG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, MI-UN.TO has a market cap of 490.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while MI-UN.TO trades at $12.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas MI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is less volatile compared to MI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, HOM-U.TO has a market cap of 448.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while HOM-U.TO trades at $13.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas HOM-U.TO's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HOM-U.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is less volatile compared to HOM-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, ERE-UN.TO has a market cap of 231.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while ERE-UN.TO trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas ERE-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ERE-UN.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is less volatile compared to ERE-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.

MHC-U.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHC-U.TO stands at 449.49M. In comparison, DRR-U.TO has a market cap of 169.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC-U.TO is priced at $17.25, while DRR-U.TO trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHC-U.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.23, whereas DRR-U.TO's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, MHC-U.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DRR-U.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC-U.TO is less volatile compared to DRR-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC-U.TO.