LeanLife Health Inc.
LeanLife Health Inc. LNLHF Peers
See (LNLHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNLHF | $0.01 | N/A | 3.04M | -0.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| NSRGY | $105.00 | +1.68% | 270.96B | 21.08 | $4.98 | +3.23% |
| NSRGF | $103.82 | +1.37% | 266.91B | 20.85 | $4.98 | +3.54% |
| GPDNF | $83.79 | +2.07% | 53.98B | 23.94 | $3.50 | +2.90% |
| DANOY | $16.65 | +0.45% | 53.61B | 23.78 | $0.70 | +2.24% |
| TUFBY | $11.53 | +35.65% | 47.32B | 16.47 | $0.70 | +3.39% |
| AJINY | $22.88 | +0.39% | 22.75B | 95.33 | $0.24 | +1.16% |
| ELOAF | $0.01 | N/A | 22.44B | 0.80 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ASBFF | $29.04 | N/A | 20.91B | 12.31 | $2.36 | +2.94% |
| AJINF | $20.72 | N/A | 20.60B | 86.33 | $0.24 | +1.32% |
Stock Comparison
LNLHF vs NSRGY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 270.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while NSRGY trades at $105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs NSRGF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 266.91B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while NSRGF trades at $103.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs GPDNF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 53.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while GPDNF trades at $83.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and GPDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs DANOY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 53.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while DANOY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs TUFBY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 47.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TUFBY trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs AJINY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 22.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while AJINY trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 95.33. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs ELOAF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ELOAF has a market cap of 22.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while ELOAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ELOAF's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to ELOAF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to ELOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs ASBFF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 20.91B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while ASBFF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and ASBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs AJINF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 20.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while AJINF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 86.33. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to AJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs ASBFY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 20.24B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while ASBFY trades at $28.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs KRYAY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 17.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while KRYAY trades at $109.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs KRYAF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 16.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while KRYAF trades at $102.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs JBSAY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 15.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while JBSAY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs GRBMF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 13.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while GRBMF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to GRBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs BMBOY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 13.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while BMBOY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to BMBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs JDEPF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 12.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while JDEPF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to JDEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs WHGRF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 11.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while WHGRF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs ORKLY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 11.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while ORKLY trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs LOTBY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, LOTBY has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while LOTBY trades at $134.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LOTBY's P/E ratio is 66.13. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to LOTBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to LOTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs WHGLY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while WHGLY trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs ORKLF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 10.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while ORKLF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to ORKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs CIADF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.72B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and CIADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs KIKOY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 9.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while KIKOY trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and KIKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs TYCMY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 9.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TYCMY trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs KIKOF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 9.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while KIKOF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs TCYMF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TCYMF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to TCYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs CIADY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while CIADY trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 579.75. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs TTAZF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and TTAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs PIFFY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs SAPIF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 7.54B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while SAPIF trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -67.19. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and SAPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs WWNTF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 7.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while WWNTF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to WWNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs CFEIY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while CFEIY trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and CFEIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs GCHOY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while GCHOY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs SDPNF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs GPAGF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while GPAGF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and GPAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs ARHUF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while ARHUF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to ARHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs TSUKY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.57B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TSUKY trades at $65.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs DLLFF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and DLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs MEJHY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while MEJHY trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and MEJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs CHFLF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while CHFLF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs TSUKF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs NFPDF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 5.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while NFPDF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to NFPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs MEJHF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs EMLZF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while EMLZF trades at $990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs SMPFF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and SMPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs IOIOF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and IOIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs PIFMY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while PIFMY trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs PIFMF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to PIFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs NSLYF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while NSLYF trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and NSLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs ACOPF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while ACOPF trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to ACOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs UVRBY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while UVRBY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and UVRBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs MRRTY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while MRRTY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs TATYY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TATYY trades at $32.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to TATYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs NIPMY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs UVRBF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while UVRBF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and UVRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs CRWKF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs NSFMF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to NSFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs TATYF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TATYF trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs GLAPY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while GLAPY trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to GLAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs GLAPF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while GLAPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs NCHEY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs YMZBY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while YMZBY trades at $152.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs FPAFY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while FPAFY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs FPAFF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while FPAFF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to FPAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs CBCFF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while CBCFF trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and CBCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs EBRPY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and EBRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs EBRPF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and EBRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs SUEZF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while SUEZF trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is 52.16. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to SUEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs PRBZF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while PRBZF trades at $59.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and PRBZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs SUEZY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while SUEZY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is 52.92. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and SUEZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs LYSFF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while LYSFF trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs CLBEY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while CLBEY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and CLBEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs LYSFY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while LYSFY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs PRRFY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while PRRFY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to PRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs ARZTF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs NHFOF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while NHFOF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and NHFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs MLFNF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while MLFNF trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and MLFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs FTROF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while FTROF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs ARZTY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while ARZTY trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs TBLMF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TBLMF trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs SGLJF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs PFODF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while PFODF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs GRPBF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and GRPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs HOFJF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while HOFJF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and HOFJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs TBLMY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and TBLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs FSRCY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while FSRCY trades at $109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs YNNHF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to YNNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs TUFUF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs AVSFY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while AVSFY trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to AVSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs FNEVF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to FNEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs HLFGY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs VTSYF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while VTSYF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 128.00. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs NISUY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while NISUY trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs FNEVY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while FNEVY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and FNEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs GNCGY Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while GNCGY trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to GNCGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs GBFBF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and GBFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs AKEJF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while AKEJF trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNLHF.
LNLHF vs HLTFF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and HLTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
LNLHF vs JWLLF Comparison
LNLHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNLHF stands at 3.04M. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LNLHF is priced at $0.01, while JWLLF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNLHF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, LNLHF's ROE is +11.93%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNLHF and JWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).