LIV Capital Acquisition Corp. II

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, CCIV has a market cap of 44.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while CCIV trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas CCIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCIV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to CCIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 16.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SYM trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -350.00. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, PSACU has a market cap of 12.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while PSACU trades at $17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas PSACU's P/E ratio is -108.79. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSACU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to PSACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, RTPY has a market cap of 11.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while RTPY trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas RTPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTPY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to RTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, LVRAW has a market cap of 11.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while LVRAW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas LVRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LVRAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to LVRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, CMLFU has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while CMLFU trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas CMLFU's P/E ratio is -1444.44. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMLFU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to CMLFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, PSAC has a market cap of 9.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while PSAC trades at $13.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas PSAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSAC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to PSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, GRSVU has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while GRSVU trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas GRSVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRSVU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB and GRSVU have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, APSG has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while APSG trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas APSG's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APSG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to APSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, RTP has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while RTP trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas RTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTP's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to RTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, DGNR has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while DGNR trades at $9.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas DGNR's P/E ratio is -308.67. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to DGNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, VTIQ has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while VTIQ trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas VTIQ's P/E ratio is 91.50. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIQ's ROE of +472.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to VTIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, VTIQU has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while VTIQU trades at $10.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas VTIQU's P/E ratio is 100.60. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIQU's ROE of +472.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB and VTIQU have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, VACQ has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while VACQ trades at $11.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas VACQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VACQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to VACQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SVFC has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SVFC trades at $9.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SVFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVFC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SVFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, VGAC has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while VGAC trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas VGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGAC's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to VGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, CMLT has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while CMLT trades at $8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas CMLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMLT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to CMLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, GHVI has a market cap of 4.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while GHVI trades at $14.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas GHVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to GHVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, KVSB has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while KVSB trades at $11.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas KVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KVSB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to KVSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FTOCU has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FTOCU trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FTOCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FTOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, THCBU has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while THCBU trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas THCBU's P/E ratio is -101.87. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THCBU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to THCBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, CLII has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while CLII trades at $14.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas CLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLII's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to CLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, GRNV has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while GRNV trades at $12.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas GRNV's P/E ratio is -59.68. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRNV's ROE of -101981.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to GRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FRX has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FRX trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, HOLUU has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while HOLUU trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas HOLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOLUU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to HOLUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SSPK has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SSPK trades at $18.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SSPK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSPK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SSPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FCACU has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FCACU trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FCACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCACU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FCACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, CFVI has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while CFVI trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas CFVI's P/E ratio is -18.55. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFVI's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to CFVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, HOL has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while HOL trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas HOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to HOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, THCB has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while THCB trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas THCB's P/E ratio is -81.30. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THCB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to THCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SOAC has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SOAC trades at $10.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SOAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SOAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FUSE has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FUSE trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FUSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUSE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FUSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, DCRBU has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while DCRBU trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas DCRBU's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCRBU's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to DCRBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, IVAN has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while IVAN trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas IVAN's P/E ratio is -698.18. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to IVAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, GWAC has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while GWAC trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas GWAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to GWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, LCYAU has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while LCYAU trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas LCYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCYAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB and LCYAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, APXTU has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while APXTU trades at $13.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas APXTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APXTU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB and APXTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FWAA has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FWAA trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FWAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FWAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, GSAH has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while GSAH trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas GSAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSAH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to GSAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, LCY has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while LCY trades at $12.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas LCY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to LCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FORE has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FORE trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FORE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FORE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, APXT has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while APXT trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas APXT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APXT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to APXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, RAAC has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while RAAC trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas RAAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to RAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SPNV has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SPNV trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SPNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPNV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SPNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, DNAC has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while DNAC trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas DNAC's P/E ratio is -37.72. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to DNAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FAII has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FAII trades at $10.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FAII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAII's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, DMYI has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while DMYI trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas DMYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMYI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to DMYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, LOKB has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while LOKB trades at $13.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas LOKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOKB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to LOKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, STPC has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while STPC trades at $9.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas STPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STPC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to STPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, MUDS has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while MUDS trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas MUDS's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to MUDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, MUDSU has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while MUDSU trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas MUDSU's P/E ratio is -1125.56. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUDSU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB and MUDSU have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, TINV has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while TINV trades at $11.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas TINV's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TINV's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to TINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, CMII has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while CMII trades at $10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas CMII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to CMII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, DWAC has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while DWAC trades at $49.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas DWAC's P/E ratio is -73.46. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWAC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to DWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, DWACU has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while DWACU trades at $61.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas DWACU's P/E ratio is -451.10. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWACU's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to DWACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, ATHN has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while ATHN trades at $9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas ATHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATHN's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to ATHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, GMII has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while GMII trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas GMII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMII's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to GMII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SVACU has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SVACU trades at $9.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SVACU's P/E ratio is -22.89. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVACU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SVACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, MOTV has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while MOTV trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas MOTV's P/E ratio is 55.86. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOTV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to MOTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SVAC has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SVAC trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SVAC's P/E ratio is -32.05. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVAC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, CBAH has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while CBAH trades at $10.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas CBAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBAH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to CBAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, GXGXU has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while GXGXU trades at $11.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas GXGXU's P/E ratio is -23.73. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GXGXU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to GXGXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, AONE has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while AONE trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas AONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AONE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to AONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SNPR has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SNPR trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SNPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNPR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SNPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SPFR has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SPFR trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SPFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPFR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SPFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, DEH has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while DEH trades at $11.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas DEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to DEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, ROT has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while ROT trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas ROT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to ROT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, NGAC has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while NGAC trades at $8.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas NGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to NGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, GXGX has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while GXGX trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas GXGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GXGX's ROE of -3.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to GXGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, HECCU has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while HECCU trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas HECCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HECCU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to HECCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, ATMR has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while ATMR trades at $10.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas ATMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATMR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to ATMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SFTW has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SFTW trades at $11.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SFTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFTW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, ENFA has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while ENFA trades at $9.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas ENFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENFA's ROE of -825.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to ENFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, ENVI has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while ENVI trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas ENVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to ENVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, DFNS has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while DFNS trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas DFNS's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to DFNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, ACTD has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while ACTD trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas ACTD's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACTD's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to ACTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, VCKA has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while VCKA trades at $9.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas VCKA's P/E ratio is 100.11. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCKA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to VCKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, THMA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while THMA trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas THMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to THMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, LNFA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while LNFA trades at $10.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas LNFA's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LNFA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to LNFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FTIVU has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FTIVU trades at $14.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FTIVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTIVU's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FTIVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, STWO has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while STWO trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas STWO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STWO's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to STWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, HYACU has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while HYACU trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas HYACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYACU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to HYACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FTIV has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FTIV trades at $13.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FTIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTIV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FTIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, AHAC has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while AHAC trades at $10.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas AHAC's P/E ratio is -72.11. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AHAC's ROE of +5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to AHAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, AMHC has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while AMHC trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas AMHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to AMHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, HERAW has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while HERAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas HERAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HERAW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to HERAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, HERA has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while HERA trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas HERA's P/E ratio is 46.32. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HERA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to HERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FGNA has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FGNA trades at $9.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FGNA's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGNA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to FGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, DNAA has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while DNAA trades at $14.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas DNAA's P/E ratio is -54.53. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to DNAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, RACA has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while RACA trades at $10.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas RACA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RACA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to RACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, TREB has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while TREB trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas TREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TREB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to TREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, PACE has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while PACE trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas PACE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PACE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to PACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, HERAU has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while HERAU trades at $10.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas HERAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HERAU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to HERAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, LSAQ has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while LSAQ trades at $9.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas LSAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to LSAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SRAC has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SRAC trades at $10.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SRAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRAC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SRAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, FTPAW has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while FTPAW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas FTPAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTPAW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB and FTPAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, SBG has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while SBG trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas SBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBG's ROE of -3.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to SBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, CVII-WT has a market cap of 977.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while CVII-WT trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas CVII-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVII-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to CVII-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.

LIVB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LIVB stands at 73.34M. In comparison, CVII-UN has a market cap of 958.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVB is priced at $10.97, while CVII-UN trades at $10.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LIVB currently has a P/E ratio of 274.13, whereas CVII-UN's P/E ratio is 64.65. In terms of profitability, LIVB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVII-UN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVB is less volatile compared to CVII-UN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVB.