MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor Pan Africa UCITS ETF
MULTI-UNITS LUXEMBOURG - Lyxor Pan Africa UCITS ETF LGQM.DE Peers
See (LGQM.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGQM.DE | $10.64 | -0.02% | 35.09M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | $351.57 | +0.35% | 2.94T | 16.60 | $21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | $304.50 | +0.35% | 2.55T | 16.60 | $18.34 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | $285.82 | +0.19% | 2.39T | 14.27 | $20.04 | N/A |
| 3SUR.DE | $1,832.40 | +0.37% | 510.60B | N/A | N/A | +1.11% |
| BBN1.F | $129.36 | -0.99% | 157.50B | 43.85 | $2.95 | +3.17% |
| BLQA.DE | $845.50 | -0.62% | 125.24B | 23.42 | $36.10 | +1.36% |
| ZPDW.DE | $71.02 | -0.73% | 110.13B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXR8.DE | $562.20 | -0.70% | 100.93B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNL.DE | $100.38 | -0.57% | 91.89B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LGQM.DE vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 2.94T. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at $351.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.55T. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at $304.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.39T. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at $285.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs 3SUR.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, 3SUR.DE has a market cap of 510.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while 3SUR.DE trades at $1,832.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SUR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3SUR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to 3SUR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs BBN1.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 157.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while BBN1.F trades at $129.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 43.85. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs BLQA.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.24B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while BLQA.DE trades at $845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 110.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while ZPDW.DE trades at $71.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 100.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SXR8.DE trades at $562.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 91.89B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EUNL.DE trades at $100.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 62.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while VUAA.DE trades at $100.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 62.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while VUSA.DE trades at $100.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SXRZ.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 49.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SXRZ.DE trades at $232.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XJSE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 40.67B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XJSE.DE trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 36.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while VGWL.DE trades at $128.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 33.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while VWCE.DE trades at $130.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs VGWL.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while VGWL.F trades at $102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs A4S.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while A4S.DE trades at $275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 27.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at $1,048.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs P500.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 27.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while P500.DE trades at $1,045.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SPPE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 25.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SPPE.DE trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IBC3.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IBC3.F trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IS3N.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IS3N.DE trades at $33.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 22.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SPY5.DE trades at $528.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 21.57B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IBC3.DE trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs TR1.DU Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 19.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while TR1.DU trades at $86.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs PPFB.SG Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 18.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while PPFB.SG trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs LYP2.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 18.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while LYP2.DE trades at $294.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs 6TVM.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 18.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while 6TVM.DE trades at $54.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 17.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XDWD.DE trades at $109.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 17.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XDWL.DE trades at $92.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IUSA.DE trades at $52.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IUSZ.DE trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SXRV.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 14.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SXRV.DE trades at $1,086.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.45B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IUSQ.DE trades at $83.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs JUHE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 11.67B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while JUHE.DE trades at $47.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 11.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SPPW.DE trades at $36.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XDEE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 10.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XDEE.DE trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 10.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XDEW.DE trades at $87.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while JREU.DE trades at $52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs JRUD.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while JRUD.DE trades at $48.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs DWS.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 10.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while DWS.DE trades at $50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EUNK.DE trades at $86.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while QDVE.DE trades at $29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 9.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while OM3L.DE trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EUN5.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 9.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EUN5.DE trades at $120.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while H4ZJ.DE trades at $34.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while LYYA.DE trades at $342.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EGV2.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EGV2.DE trades at $101.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while STXH.DE trades at $141.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 9.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IQQY.DE trades at $34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs LYP6.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.78B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while LYP6.DE trades at $262.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EXS1.DE trades at $198.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EXIC.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EXIC.DE trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XD9E.DE trades at $120.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XS5E.DE trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 8.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XD9U.DE trades at $154.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XD9D.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 8.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XD9D.DE trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 8.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while D5BM.DE trades at $105.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at $64.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EXW1.DE trades at $55.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 7.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EXSA.DE trades at $55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 7.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EXIE.DE trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 7.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SGAS.DE trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while VGVF.DE trades at $102.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EQQQ.DE trades at $464.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 7.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while VGVE.DE trades at $99.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IQQW.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IQQW.DE trades at $73.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EDMU.DE trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XWEH.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XWEH.DE trades at $41.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XZMU.DE trades at $57.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs DBXE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while DBXE.DE trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while 2B7K.DE trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs VGWD.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while VGWD.DE trades at $64.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 6.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while DBXW.DE trades at $107.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs LCUW.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while LCUW.DE trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EXIC.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.58B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EXIC.F trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at $53.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while H4ZF.DE trades at $53.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs DBXD.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while DBXD.DE trades at $224.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XMME.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XMME.F trades at $46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs TCC4.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while TCC4.DE trades at $222.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs DBXU.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while DBXU.DE trades at $173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IBCF.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 6.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IBCF.DE trades at $124.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 6.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs H1D5.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while H1D5.DE trades at $142.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs AUM5.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, AUM5.DE has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while AUM5.DE trades at $104.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUM5.DE's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUM5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to AUM5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XMME.DE trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs XIEE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while XIEE.DE trades at $78.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SPP1.DE trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SC0J.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SC0J.DE has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SC0J.DE trades at $107.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC0J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to SC0J.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs AMEW.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, AMEW.DE has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while AMEW.DE trades at $548.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMEW.DE's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to AMEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs SC0J.F Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, SC0J.F has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while SC0J.F trades at $82.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC0J.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to SC0J.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs QDV5.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, QDV5.DE has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while QDV5.DE trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDV5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDV5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to QDV5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EDM6.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EDM6.DE has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EDM6.DE trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDM6.DE's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDM6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EDM6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EMNU.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EMNU.DE has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EMNU.DE trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EMNU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs VUKE.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, VUKE.DE has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while VUKE.DE trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUKE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUKE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to VUKE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs EUNN.DE Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, EUNN.DE has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while EUNN.DE trades at $52.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is more volatile compared to EUNN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE vs IE00BYML9W36.SG Comparison
LGQM.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGQM.DE stands at 35.09M. In comparison, IE00BYML9W36.SG has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LGQM.DE is priced at $10.64, while IE00BYML9W36.SG trades at $49.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGQM.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BYML9W36.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGQM.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BYML9W36.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGQM.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BYML9W36.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGQM.DE.