Karnalyte Resources Inc.

KRN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRN.TO stands at 7.19M. In comparison, NTR.TO has a market cap of 39.54B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.TO is priced at $0.14, while NTR.TO trades at $80.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NTR.TO's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, KRN.TO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NTR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.TO is more volatile compared to NTR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.TO.

KRN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRN.TO stands at 7.19M. In comparison, NPK.TO has a market cap of 25.54M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.TO is priced at $0.14, while NPK.TO trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NPK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, KRN.TO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NPK.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.TO is more volatile compared to NPK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.TO.

KRN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRN.TO stands at 7.19M. In comparison, ERTH.CN has a market cap of 12.77M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.TO is priced at $0.14, while ERTH.CN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ERTH.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, KRN.TO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ERTH.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.TO is more volatile compared to ERTH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.TO.

KRN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRN.TO stands at 7.19M. In comparison, BEE.CN has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.TO is priced at $0.14, while BEE.CN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BEE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KRN.TO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BEE.CN's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.TO is more volatile compared to BEE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.TO.