Keweenaw Land Association, Limited
Keweenaw Land Association, Limited KEWL Peers
See (KEWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEWL | $31.97 | -0.06% | 41.34M | 0.37 | $87.33 | N/A |
| KLBAY | $6.84 | -7.32% | 20.79B | 68.40 | $0.10 | +0.87% |
| UPMKF | $29.24 | N/A | 15.42B | 44.98 | $0.65 | +5.55% |
| UPMMY | $28.17 | +0.93% | 14.92B | 44.02 | $0.64 | +6.14% |
| SCABY | $14.35 | -0.03% | 9.17B | 26.56 | $0.54 | +2.14% |
| SVCBF | $12.74 | -4.85% | 8.95B | 23.59 | $0.54 | +2.33% |
| SEOAY | $10.05 | +0.90% | 8.28B | -67.00 | -$0.15 | +2.18% |
| MONDF | $18.53 | +5.14% | 8.18B | 9.70 | $1.91 | N/A |
| MONDY | $31.69 | -1.37% | 6.99B | 28.55 | $1.11 | +5.79% |
| SEOJF | $8.56 | N/A | 6.92B | -57.07 | -$0.15 | +2.67% |
Stock Comparison
KEWL vs KLBAY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, KLBAY has a market cap of 20.79B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while KLBAY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas KLBAY's P/E ratio is 68.40. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KLBAY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to KLBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs UPMKF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 15.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while UPMKF trades at $29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 44.98. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to UPMKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs UPMMY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 14.92B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while UPMMY trades at $28.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs SCABY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, SCABY has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while SCABY trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas SCABY's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCABY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to SCABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs SVCBF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, SVCBF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while SVCBF trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas SVCBF's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to SVCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs SEOAY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, SEOAY has a market cap of 8.28B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while SEOAY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas SEOAY's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEOAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to SEOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs MONDF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, MONDF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while MONDF trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas MONDF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MONDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and MONDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs MONDY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while MONDY trades at $31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs SEOJF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while SEOJF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is -57.07. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to SEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs OJIPY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 4.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while OJIPY trades at $46.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to OJIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs OJIPF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 4.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while OJIPF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and OJIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs RTTNY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, RTTNY has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while RTTNY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas RTTNY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTTNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and RTTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs POELF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while POELF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to POELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs STLJF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while STLJF trades at $53.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs HLMNY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, HLMNY has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while HLMNY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas HLMNY's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLMNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to HLMNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs BLRDF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while BLRDF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to BLRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs PIKQF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while PIKQF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and PIKQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs NDGPY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while NDGPY trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and NDGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs NDGPF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while NDGPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to NDGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs LMPMF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while LMPMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and LMPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs CFPZF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while CFPZF trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs SPPJY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while SPPJY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to SPPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs LMPMY Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while LMPMY trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to LMPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs NIJPF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 782.64M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while NIJPF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to NIJPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs TKFTF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and TKFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs IFSPF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 523.80M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while IFSPF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs PKNOF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 319.16M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while PKNOF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and PKNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs ACAZF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 222.25M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while ACAZF trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to ACAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs RTERF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.58M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while RTERF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTERF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and RTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs ACSYF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 124.91M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while ACSYF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to ACSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs WFSTF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 95.02M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while WFSTF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to WFSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs GFELF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 71.28M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while GFELF trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and GFELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs ICLTF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, ICLTF has a market cap of 65.55M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while ICLTF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas ICLTF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICLTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and ICLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs CFPUF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 35.87M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while CFPUF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to CFPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs RUBNF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 20.83M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while RUBNF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to RUBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs BRGSF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.76M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and BRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs TCOR Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 17.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while TCOR trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and TCOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs CFXTF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 11.01M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while CFXTF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and CFXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs SUPBF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and SUPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs SGTM Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 8.50M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while SGTM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs WBNEF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 5.42M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while WBNEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to WBNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs BMSPF Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to BMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs HMTC Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while HMTC trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and HMTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs BSTO Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 1.45M. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while BSTO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and BSTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs SGMD Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 18714.00. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while SGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and SGMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KEWL vs EXRG Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5710.00. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while EXRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXRG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to EXRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs ZMGD Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5228.00. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL is less volatile compared to ZMGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEWL.
KEWL vs BPMI Comparison
KEWL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEWL stands at 41.34M. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617.00. Regarding current trading prices, KEWL is priced at $31.97, while BPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEWL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.37, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KEWL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEWL and BPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).