Kodiak Energy Inc.
Kodiak Energy Inc. KDKN Peers
See (KDKN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDKN | $0.00 | N/A | 1297.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEYYY | $7.00 | -18.89% | 175.45B | 4.76 | $1.47 | +4.00% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | N/A | 66.78B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $15.73 | +6.50% | 29.81B | 8.41 | $1.87 | +7.79% |
| TRMLF | $46.47 | -0.71% | 17.39B | 19.20 | $2.42 | +4.72% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | N/A | 16.99B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| PEXNY | $8.26 | -2.82% | 16.40B | 7.06 | $1.17 | +6.72% |
| IPXHY | $12.92 | +0.15% | 15.47B | 5.32 | $2.43 | +3.28% |
| IPXHF | $12.85 | N/A | 15.39B | 5.42 | $2.37 | +3.96% |
| SSLZY | $4.09 | -2.55% | 13.25B | 10.76 | $0.38 | +2.17% |
Stock Comparison
KDKN vs MEYYY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 175.45B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs NSTKF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.78B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs WOPEF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 29.81B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while WOPEF trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs TRMLF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.39B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while TRMLF trades at $46.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs DETNF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PEXNY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 16.40B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PEXNY trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs IPXHY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 15.47B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while IPXHY trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs IPXHF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 15.39B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while IPXHF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs SSLZY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 13.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while SSLZY trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs STOSF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while STOSF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs AETUF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 11.63B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while AETUF trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs NOVKY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.47B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PTRRY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PTRRY trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs VSOGF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while VSOGF trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs DKDRF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while DKDRF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PREKF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PREKF trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs MEGEF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while MEGEF trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs SPGYF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while SPGYF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PMOIF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PMOIF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -24.80. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs HBRIY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while HBRIY trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -22.80. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs DELKY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while DELKY trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs DLKGF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while DLKGF trades at $170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs OASPW Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PEYUF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PEYUF trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs EERGF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while EERGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs BTEGF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs JPTXF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while JPTXF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs BEPTF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while BEPTF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs NUVSF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while NUVSF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PRMRF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PRMRF trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs ATHOF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while ATHOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs BCHEY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while BCHEY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs IPCFF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while IPCFF trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PTGIF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PTGIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs FRHLF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while FRHLF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs AAVVF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while AAVVF trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -59.54. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs BIREF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while BIREF trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs EFVIF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs CRCQW Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs WLLAW Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs DTNOF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while DTNOF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs CDDRF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while CDDRF trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs KWTEF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 982.68M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while KWTEF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs UNEGF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.47M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs KELTF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 896.75M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while KELTF trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PARXF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 894.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PARXF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs AOIFF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 890.57M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while AOIFF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs CWEGF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs KRNGF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 857.12M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while KRNGF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs BWEFF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 807.75M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while BWEFF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs KRNGY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 771.41M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while KRNGY trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs CRLFF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 713.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while CRLFF trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PTHRF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 657.23M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PTHRF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -57.50. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs EEENF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, EEENF has a market cap of 636.54M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while EEENF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEENF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EEENF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is less volatile compared to EEENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs SQZZF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 613.12M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while SQZZF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs AAGEF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.40M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs GFKSY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.32M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs RCKHF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 475.57M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while RCKHF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs GUKYF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 453.54M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while GUKYF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 69.67. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs TBNRF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414.03M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs DALXF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 400.09M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while DALXF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs SHASF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 398.43M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while SHASF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PTALF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 391.68M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PTALF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs BKBEF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs ZPTAF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 382.16M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while ZPTAF trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs COPJF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 371.20M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while COPJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PRYGF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.48M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PEGIY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.48M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs CEIEF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 324.15M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while CEIEF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs ENQUF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316.04M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs ATUUF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 295.32M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while ATUUF trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -53.55. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs TUWLF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 292.18M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while TUWLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PESAF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 282.55M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PESAF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs FECCF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 280.58M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while FECCF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FECCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs OILSF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 258.39M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while OILSF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs GEGYY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 242.65M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while GEGYY trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs GEGYF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 236.68M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while GEGYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs TUWOY Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 229.94M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while TUWOY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs EXCE Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 216.92M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while EXCE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs HZNFF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.29M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs ITEEF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.45M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PSHIF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.35M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs HRCXF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 183.97M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs CRNZF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 178.33M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while CRNZF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs RECWF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.30M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs SEUSF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 168.76M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while SEUSF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs GASXF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 163.69M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while GASXF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs TGRO Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, TGRO has a market cap of 161.44M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while TGRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TGRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is less volatile compared to TGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs ZNOG Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 161.40M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while ZNOG trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -15.61. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PNWRF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.70M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs KGEIF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 154.96M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs IPOOF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 149.60M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while IPOOF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs ALVOF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 148.44M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while ALVOF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PIFYF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 145.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PIFYF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs CVONF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 143.13M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while CVONF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs EEGUF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 138.86M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while EEGUF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs SLGYF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 134.97M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs LNDNF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 125.80M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while LNDNF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.
KDKN vs PTRUF Comparison
KDKN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDKN stands at 1297.00. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 122.63M. Regarding current trading prices, KDKN is priced at $0.00, while PTRUF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDKN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 95.65. In terms of profitability, KDKN's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PTRUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDKN is more volatile compared to PTRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDKN.