iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) ISF.L Peers
See (ISF.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISF.L | $855.40 | +0.56% | 12.07B | 17.65 | $0.48 | +3.44% |
| CNDX.L | $1,221.80 | +0.07% | 20.06T | 32.96 | $37.06 | N/A |
| IUSA.L | $4,454.75 | +0.64% | 1.31T | N/A | N/A | +1.06% |
| SSAC.L | $7,028.00 | +0.47% | 1.05T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | $7,189.00 | -0.11% | 840.72B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESC.L | $7,875.50 | +0.10% | 788.64B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | $4,796.75 | +0.09% | 788.61B | N/A | N/A | +2.70% |
| MEUD.L | $21,965.00 | +0.23% | 759.37B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IITU.L | $2,525.00 | -0.20% | 744.36B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CNAL.L | $11,397.00 | -0.44% | 643.63B | -10.65 | -$10.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ISF.L vs CNDX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CNDX.L has a market cap of 20.06T. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CNDX.L trades at $1,221.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CNDX.L's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNDX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to CNDX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.31T. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IUSA.L trades at $4,454.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.05T. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SSAC.L trades at $7,028.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 840.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SMEA.L trades at $7,189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XESC.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 788.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XESC.L trades at $7,875.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XESX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 788.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XESX.L trades at $4,796.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 759.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while MEUD.L trades at $21,965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IITU.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 744.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IITU.L trades at $2,525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 643.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CNAL.L trades at $11,397.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.65. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 560.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IWRD.L trades at $6,199.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 537.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XDAX.L trades at $18,727.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 489.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XMMS.L trades at $4,691.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 487.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while PHGP.L trades at $22,339.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 475.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while GLDA.L trades at $9,510.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 471.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while MXWS.L trades at $9,099.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 445.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XMUS.L trades at $13,277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs UC44.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 434.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while UC44.L trades at $12,855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 428.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XMEU.L trades at $8,283.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CS51.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 412.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CS51.L trades at $17,223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs EUE.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 368.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while EUE.L trades at $4,669.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 367.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IEEM.L trades at $3,444.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs UB32.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 352.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while UB32.L trades at $8,763.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CACX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 338.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CACX.L trades at $6,623.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 305.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XSX6.L trades at $11,638.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 304.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SEMA.L trades at $3,239.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 296.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IWFQ.L trades at $5,358.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 289.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while GBSS.L trades at $21,995.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 274.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IWFV.L trades at $3,606.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 265.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SGBX.L trades at $22,949.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 247.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while ISPY.L trades at $2,318.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 234.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CEA1.L trades at $14,682.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 224.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CPJ1.L trades at $14,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 224.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while RBTX.L trades at $1,072.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs JERE.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 223.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while JERE.L trades at $3,886.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 223.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while JRDE.L trades at $3,647.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SUES.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 220.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SUES.L trades at $594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 204.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IUQF.L trades at $1,119.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 199.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IWFM.L trades at $6,549.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 198.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while HMEF.L trades at $878.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 188.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while PHSP.L trades at $2,212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 187.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XDEV.L trades at $3,719.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SOYU.L trades at $307.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 172.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while UIFS.L trades at $1,131.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 168.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CEUR.L trades at $30,767.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 168.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SPGP.L trades at $1,591.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 167.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XXSC.L trades at $5,362.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 161.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XDEQ.L trades at $5,447.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 148.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while PRIR.L trades at $1,455.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CU1.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 143.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CU1.L trades at $45,855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 141.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IEFV.L trades at $847.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 140.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while GBSP.L trades at $1,638.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 140.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while ISP6.L trades at $6,608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 138.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IPRP.L trades at $2,621.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs WATL.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 136.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while WATL.L trades at $5,770.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 131.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CUS1.L trades at $38,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs GILS.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 131.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while GILS.L trades at $10,072.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 131.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XZEU.L trades at $2,789.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 129.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while 0GWB.IL trades at $522.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 129.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XCX6.L trades at $1,334.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs UC79.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 124.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while UC79.L trades at $1,103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs INFL.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while INFL.L trades at $9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CG1.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 117.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CG1.L trades at $35,467.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 116.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SP5G.L trades at $200.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 62.47. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CB5.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 116.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CB5.L trades at $3,822.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 113.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CSPX.L trades at $631.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 112.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XRSG.L trades at $23,215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 111.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IGSG.L trades at $5,872.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 111.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SPEX.L trades at $4,532.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 110.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IJPN.L trades at $1,388.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SPES.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 110.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SPES.L trades at $4,281.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 110.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XDEM.L trades at $5,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 107.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while JRDM.L trades at $2,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs H50E.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 107.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while H50E.L trades at $4,855.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 107.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while RIEG.L trades at $1,439.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 107.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IEUX.L trades at $4,052.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 106.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while PRIC.L trades at $1,590.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IMV.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 103.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IMV.L trades at $5,719.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 102.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IWDA.L trades at $112.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 101.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while DAXX.L trades at $18,267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 98.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CSCA.L trades at $16,833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs UB45.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 93.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while UB45.L trades at $6,139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 93.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while MTIX.L trades at $13,964.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 92.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while PRIJ.L trades at $2,395.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 92.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IUKD.L trades at $820.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 89.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XLKQ.L trades at $51,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 89.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while WQDS.L trades at $550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 88.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XDN0.L trades at $4,149.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs COMM.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 87.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while COMM.L trades at $540.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 87.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while EQDS.L trades at $543.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 86.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while XDEB.L trades at $3,648.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 85.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CSP1.L trades at $47,567.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 85.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while CRPX.L trades at $12,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 83.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IGUS.L trades at $13,537.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs INAA.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 81.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while INAA.L trades at $8,295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs HMCH.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, HMCH.L has a market cap of 79.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while HMCH.L trades at $561.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HMCH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMCH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to HMCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs EQSG.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, EQSG.L has a market cap of 78.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while EQSG.L trades at $5,017.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EQSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to EQSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs IDVY.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, IDVY.L has a market cap of 78.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while IDVY.L trades at $1,846.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IDVY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDVY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to IDVY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs SWDA.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, SWDA.L has a market cap of 77.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while SWDA.L trades at $8,485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SWDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is less volatile compared to SWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.
ISF.L vs HMXJ.L Comparison
ISF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISF.L stands at 12.07B. In comparison, HMXJ.L has a market cap of 77.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ISF.L is priced at $855.40, while HMXJ.L trades at $1,103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HMXJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISF.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMXJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISF.L is more volatile compared to HMXJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISF.L.