iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) IS3C.DE Peers
See (IS3C.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IS3C.DE | $66.21 | -0.37% | 1.83B | N/A | N/A | +5.60% |
| 0P00000MO4.F | $348.67 | +1.50% | 2.92T | 16.59 | $21.02 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | $301.98 | +1.50% | 2.53T | 16.59 | $18.20 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | $282.56 | -0.61% | 2.36T | 14.02 | $20.16 | N/A |
| 3SUR.DE | $1,807.40 | +0.06% | 488.71B | N/A | N/A | +1.12% |
| BBN1.F | $132.74 | -0.32% | 161.59B | 45.46 | $2.92 | +3.07% |
| BLQA.DE | $845.50 | -0.62% | 125.24B | 23.42 | $36.10 | +1.35% |
| ZPDW.DE | $71.03 | -1.81% | 108.51B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXR8.DE | $560.48 | -0.17% | 100.50B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNL.DE | $99.84 | -0.25% | 91.31B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IS3C.DE vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 2.92T. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at $348.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.53T. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at $301.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.36T. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at $282.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs 3SUR.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, 3SUR.DE has a market cap of 488.71B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while 3SUR.DE trades at $1,807.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SUR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3SUR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to 3SUR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs BBN1.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 161.59B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while BBN1.F trades at $132.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs BLQA.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while BLQA.DE trades at $845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 108.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while ZPDW.DE trades at $71.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 100.50B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SXR8.DE trades at $560.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 91.31B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EUNL.DE trades at $99.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 63.29B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while VUSA.DE trades at $99.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 63.02B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while VUAA.DE trades at $100.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SXRZ.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 49.43B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SXRZ.DE trades at $232.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XJSE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 40.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XJSE.DE trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while VGWL.DE trades at $127.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 33.43B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while VWCE.DE trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs VGWL.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.09B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while VGWL.F trades at $102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs A4S.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.82B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while A4S.DE trades at $275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs P500.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 27.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while P500.DE trades at $1,041.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 26.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at $1,041.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SPPE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 24.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SPPE.DE trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IBC3.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.64B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IBC3.F trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IS3N.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.46B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IS3N.DE trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 22.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SPY5.DE trades at $526.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 22.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IBC3.DE trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs TR1.DU Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 18.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while TR1.DU trades at $86.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs PPFB.SG Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 18.32B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while PPFB.SG trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 18.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XDWL.DE trades at $91.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 18.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XDWD.DE trades at $109.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.39B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IUSA.DE trades at $52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SXRV.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 14.37B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SXRV.DE trades at $1,088.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.09B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IUSZ.DE trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IUSQ.DE trades at $82.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XDEE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 10.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XDEE.DE trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 10.89B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XDEW.DE trades at $86.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 10.88B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SPPW.DE trades at $36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs DWS.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 10.35B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while DWS.DE trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 9.98B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while QDVE.DE trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 9.95B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EUNK.DE trades at $85.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EUN5.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 9.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EUN5.DE trades at $120.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 9.39B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while OM3L.DE trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.25B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while H4ZJ.DE trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.25B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EGV2.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.13B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EGV2.DE trades at $101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IQQY.DE trades at $34.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 8.91B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while STXH.DE trades at $139.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XD9E.DE trades at $119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XS5E.DE trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs LYP6.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.65B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while LYP6.DE trades at $258.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XD9U.DE trades at $154.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XD9D.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XD9D.DE trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while D5BM.DE trades at $105.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 8.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while JREU.DE trades at $52.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EXS1.DE trades at $195.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EXIC.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EXIC.DE trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8.15B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EXW1.DE trades at $55.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.12B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at $63.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 7.93B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EXIE.DE trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 7.93B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EXSA.DE trades at $54.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 7.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SGAS.DE trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 7.49B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while LYYA.DE trades at $340.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 7.48B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EQQQ.DE trades at $465.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IQQW.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.42B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IQQW.DE trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 7.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while VGVE.DE trades at $98.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 7.39B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while VGVF.DE trades at $102.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XWEH.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.37B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XWEH.DE trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 7.23B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EDMU.DE trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs DBXE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.10B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while DBXE.DE trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while 2B7K.DE trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs VGWD.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.79B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while VGWD.DE trades at $63.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 6.77B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while DBXW.DE trades at $107.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs LCUW.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while LCUW.DE trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EXIC.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.58B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EXIC.F trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while H4ZF.DE trades at $53.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at $53.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs DBXD.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while DBXD.DE trades at $220.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XMME.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XMME.F trades at $46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs DBXU.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while DBXU.DE trades at $173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs TCC4.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while TCC4.DE trades at $221.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 6.16B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XZMU.DE trades at $56.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IBCF.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IBCF.DE trades at $123.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EMNU.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EMNU.DE has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EMNU.DE trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNU.DE's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to EMNU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XMME.DE trades at $55.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs AUM5.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, AUM5.DE has a market cap of 5.82B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while AUM5.DE trades at $103.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUM5.DE's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUM5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to AUM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs H1D5.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while H1D5.DE trades at $141.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SC0J.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SC0J.DE has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SC0J.DE trades at $107.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC0J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SC0J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs XIEE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while XIEE.DE trades at $77.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SC0J.F Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SC0J.F has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SC0J.F trades at $82.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC0J.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SC0J.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SPP1.DE trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs AMEW.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, AMEW.DE has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while AMEW.DE trades at $545.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMEW.DE's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMEW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to AMEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EDM6.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EDM6.DE has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EDM6.DE trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDM6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDM6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EDM6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs UIMM.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, UIMM.DE has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while UIMM.DE trades at $150.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIMM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIMM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to UIMM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs SEAC.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, SEAC.DE has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while SEAC.DE trades at $30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEAC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to SEAC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs QDV5.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, QDV5.DE has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while QDV5.DE trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDV5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDV5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to QDV5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs VUKE.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, VUKE.DE has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while VUKE.DE trades at $44.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUKE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUKE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to VUKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs EUNN.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, EUNN.DE has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while EUNN.DE trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to EUNN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs D500.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while D500.DE trades at $48.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs IE00BYML9W36.SG Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, IE00BYML9W36.SG has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while IE00BYML9W36.SG trades at $48.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BYML9W36.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BYML9W36.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BYML9W36.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE vs 10AI.DE Comparison
IS3C.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IS3C.DE stands at 1.83B. In comparison, 10AI.DE has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, IS3C.DE is priced at $66.21, while 10AI.DE trades at $69.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IS3C.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AI.DE's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, IS3C.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 10AI.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IS3C.DE is more volatile compared to 10AI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IS3C.DE.