Integrated BioPharma, Inc.
Integrated BioPharma, Inc. INBP Peers
See (INBP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INBP | $0.26 | -13.30% | 7.88M | 8.67 | $0.03 | N/A |
| NSRGY | $101.18 | -0.99% | 260.31B | 19.84 | $5.10 | +2.57% |
| NSRGF | $99.92 | -2.67% | 256.88B | 19.63 | $5.09 | +3.70% |
| GPDNF | $81.00 | -2.65% | 52.18B | 23.55 | $3.44 | +3.00% |
| DANOY | $15.99 | -1.02% | 51.48B | 22.51 | $0.71 | +2.33% |
| TUFBY | $11.53 | +35.65% | 49.06B | 16.47 | $0.70 | +3.39% |
| ELOAF | $0.01 | N/A | 22.40B | 0.80 | $0.01 | N/A |
| AJINY | $22.42 | +1.26% | 22.29B | 35.59 | $0.63 | +1.19% |
| ASBFF | $29.04 | +21.91% | 20.91B | 12.31 | $2.36 | +2.95% |
| AJINF | $20.72 | -45.83% | 20.60B | 32.89 | $0.63 | +1.32% |
Stock Comparison
INBP vs NSRGY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 260.31B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while NSRGY trades at $101.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs NSRGF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 256.88B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while NSRGF trades at $99.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs GPDNF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 52.18B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while GPDNF trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to GPDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs DANOY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 51.48B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while DANOY trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TUFBY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 49.06B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TUFBY trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs ELOAF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, ELOAF has a market cap of 22.40B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while ELOAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas ELOAF's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELOAF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to ELOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs AJINY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 22.29B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while AJINY trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs ASBFF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 20.91B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while ASBFF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to ASBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs AJINF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 20.60B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while AJINF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to AJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs ASBFY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 20.38B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while ASBFY trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs KRYAF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 17.40B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while KRYAF trades at $105.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs KRYAY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 17.26B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while KRYAY trades at $104.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs JBSAY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 16.45B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while JBSAY trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs BMBOY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 13.20B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while BMBOY trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to BMBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs GRBMF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 12.64B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while GRBMF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to GRBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs JDEPF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 12.12B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while JDEPF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to JDEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs WHGRF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 11.30B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while WHGRF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs WHGLY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 11.23B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while WHGLY trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs ORKLY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 10.45B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while ORKLY trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs ORKLF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 10.00B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while ORKLF trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to ORKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs KIKOY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 9.91B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while KIKOY trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to KIKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs CIADF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.72B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to CIADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TYCMY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TYCMY trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs KIKOF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 9.53B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while KIKOF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs CIADY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while CIADY trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 596.00. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TCYMF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TCYMF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to TCYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TTAZF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.77B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to TTAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs PIFFY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs WWNTF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 8.03B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while WWNTF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to WWNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs SAPIF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while SAPIF trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -68.85. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to SAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs CFEIY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while CFEIY trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to CFEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs GCHOY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while GCHOY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs SDPNF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs ARHUF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while ARHUF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to ARHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs GPAGF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.59B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while GPAGF trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to GPAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs DLLFF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to DLLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs CHFLF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while CHFLF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs MEJHY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while MEJHY trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to MEJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TSUKY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TSUKY trades at $63.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TSUKF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs LOTBY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, LOTBY has a market cap of 6.17B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while LOTBY trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas LOTBY's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOTBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to LOTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs NFPDF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while NFPDF trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to NFPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs MEJHF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs EMLZF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while EMLZF trades at $990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs SMPFF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to SMPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs IOIOF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to IOIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs NSLYF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while NSLYF trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 50.05. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to NSLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs PIFMF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to PIFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs PIFMY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while PIFMY trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs ACOPF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while ACOPF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to ACOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs NIPMY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs UVRBF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while UVRBF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to UVRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs CRWKF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TATYY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TATYY trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to TATYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TATYF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TATYF trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs UVRBY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while UVRBY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to UVRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs NSFMF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to NSFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs GLAPY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while GLAPY trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to GLAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs MRRTY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while MRRTY trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs GLAPF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while GLAPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs NCHEY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs YMZBY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while YMZBY trades at $152.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs FPAFY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while FPAFY trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs FPAFF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while FPAFF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to FPAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs CBCFF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while CBCFF trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to CBCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs EBRPY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to EBRPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs EBRPF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to EBRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs PRBZF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while PRBZF trades at $60.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to PRBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs SUEZF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while SUEZF trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is 51.36. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to SUEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs SUEZY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while SUEZY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is 52.92. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to SUEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs LYSFF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while LYSFF trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs LYSFY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while LYSFY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs ARZTF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs ARZTY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while ARZTY trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs CLBEY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while CLBEY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to CLBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs NHFOF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while NHFOF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to NHFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs FTROF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while FTROF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs MLFNF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while MLFNF trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to MLFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TBLMF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TBLMF trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs PRRFY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while PRRFY trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to PRRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs SGLJF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs PFODF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while PFODF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs GRPBF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to GRPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs HOFJF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while HOFJF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to HOFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TBLMY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to TBLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs FSRCY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while FSRCY trades at $109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs YNNHF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to YNNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs TUFUF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs AVSFY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while AVSFY trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to AVSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs FNEVF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to FNEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs HLFGY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs VTSYF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while VTSYF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 128.00. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs NISUY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while NISUY trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs FNEVY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while FNEVY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to FNEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs AKEJF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while AKEJF trades at $35.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs GNCGY Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while GNCGY trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is less volatile compared to GNCGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs GBFBF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to GBFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs HLTFF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to HLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.
INBP vs JWLLF Comparison
INBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INBP stands at 7.88M. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, INBP is priced at $0.26, while JWLLF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INBP currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, INBP's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INBP is more volatile compared to JWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INBP.