iFabric Corp.

IFA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IFA.TO stands at 33.33M. In comparison, GIL.TO has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, IFA.TO is priced at $1.10, while GIL.TO trades at $68.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IFA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas GIL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, IFA.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIL.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IFA.TO is more volatile compared to GIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFA.TO.

IFA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IFA.TO stands at 33.33M. In comparison, GOOS.TO has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, IFA.TO is priced at $1.10, while GOOS.TO trades at $12.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IFA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas GOOS.TO's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, IFA.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOOS.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFA.TO is more volatile compared to GOOS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFA.TO.

IFA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IFA.TO stands at 33.33M. In comparison, UNI.TO has a market cap of 23.00M. Regarding current trading prices, IFA.TO is priced at $1.10, while UNI.TO trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IFA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas UNI.TO's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, IFA.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNI.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IFA.TO is more volatile compared to UNI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFA.TO.

IFA.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IFA.TO stands at 33.33M. In comparison, BEAN.CN has a market cap of 1.01M. Regarding current trading prices, IFA.TO is priced at $1.10, while BEAN.CN trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IFA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.00, whereas BEAN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, IFA.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BEAN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFA.TO is more volatile compared to BEAN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFA.TO.