iShares GBP Corp Bond 0-5yr UCI
iShares GBP Corp Bond 0-5yr UCI IE000WJWZK35.SG Peers
See (IE000WJWZK35.SG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IE000WJWZK35.SG | $5.42 | +0.10% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0P0001LJIZ.F | $66.20 | -0.42% | 8.45B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXRL.DE | $137.32 | +0.13% | 5.83B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNH.DE | $111.01 | +0.03% | 5.22B | N/A | N/A | +2.08% |
| VECA.DE | $52.12 | -0.13% | 4.89B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VECP.DE | $48.64 | -0.34% | 4.89B | N/A | N/A | +3.43% |
| OM3F.DE | $4.72 | -0.08% | 4.43B | N/A | N/A | +3.25% |
| VAGF.DE | $23.17 | -0.10% | 4.26B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VAGE.DE | $20.75 | -0.50% | 4.24B | N/A | N/A | +3.37% |
| SXRM.DE | $146.16 | -0.12% | 4.10B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs 0P0001LJIZ.F Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P0001LJIZ.F has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while 0P0001LJIZ.F trades at $66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001LJIZ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to 0P0001LJIZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SXRL.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SXRL.DE has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SXRL.DE trades at $137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SXRL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EUNH.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EUNH.DE has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EUNH.DE trades at $111.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNH.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EUNH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs VECA.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, VECA.DE has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while VECA.DE trades at $52.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to VECA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to VECA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs VECP.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, VECP.DE has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while VECP.DE trades at $48.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to VECP.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to VECP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs OM3F.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, OM3F.DE has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while OM3F.DE trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3F.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to OM3F.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to OM3F.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs VAGF.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, VAGF.DE has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while VAGF.DE trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to VAGF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to VAGF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs VAGE.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, VAGE.DE has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while VAGE.DE trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to VAGE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to VAGE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SXRM.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SXRM.DE has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SXRM.DE trades at $146.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SXRM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs D5BG.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, D5BG.DE has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while D5BG.DE trades at $159.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to D5BG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to D5BG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SPFE.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SPFE.DE has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SPFE.DE trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SPFE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SPFB.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SPFB.DE has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SPFB.DE trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SPFB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SPFU.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SPFU.DE has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SPFU.DE trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SPFU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SPFV.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SPFV.DE has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SPFV.DE trades at $30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SPFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IBCD.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IBCD.DE has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IBCD.DE trades at $88.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IBCD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs VUCE.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, VUCE.DE has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while VUCE.DE trades at $50.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to VUCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to VUCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs VDCE.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, VDCE.DE has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while VDCE.DE trades at $53.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to VDCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to VDCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs VUCP.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, VUCP.DE has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while VUCP.DE trades at $41.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUCP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to VUCP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to VUCP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XEC1.F Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XEC1.F has a market cap of 3.47B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XEC1.F trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEC1.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XEC1.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XEC1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IUSM.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IUSM.DE has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IUSM.DE trades at $149.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IUSM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs CB3G.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, CB3G.DE has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while CB3G.DE trades at $219.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB3G.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to CB3G.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to CB3G.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs BBLL.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, BBLL.DE has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while BBLL.DE trades at $102.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBLL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to BBLL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to BBLL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs JBEM.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, JBEM.DE has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while JBEM.DE trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to JBEM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to JBEM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs DBXN.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, DBXN.DE has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while DBXN.DE trades at $221.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to DBXN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IUSP.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IUSP.DE has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IUSP.DE trades at $39.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IUSP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs ASRI.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, ASRI.DE has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while ASRI.DE trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASRI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to ASRI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to ASRI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs DBZB.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, DBZB.DE has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while DBZB.DE trades at $206.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBZB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to DBZB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to DBZB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IUSU.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IUSU.DE has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IUSU.DE trades at $113.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IUSU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IBCN.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IBCN.DE has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IBCN.DE trades at $161.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IBCN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs VGTY.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, VGTY.DE has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while VGTY.DE trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGTY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to VGTY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to VGTY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs X03F.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, X03F.DE has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while X03F.DE trades at $172.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X03F.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to X03F.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to X03F.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs ASR3.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, ASR3.DE has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while ASR3.DE trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASR3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to ASR3.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to ASR3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XB4F.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XB4F.DE has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XB4F.DE trades at $142.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XB4F.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XB4F.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XB4F.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IBCS.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IBCS.DE has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IBCS.DE trades at $125.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IBCS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EUNA.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EUNA.DE has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EUNA.DE trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EUNA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs LYQ2.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, LYQ2.DE has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while LYQ2.DE trades at $126.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYQ2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to LYQ2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to LYQ2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IBCA.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IBCA.DE has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IBCA.DE trades at $142.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IBCA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EUN4.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EUN4.DE has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EUN4.DE trades at $108.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EUN4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EUN4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SECA.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SECA.DE has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SECA.DE trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SECA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SECA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IBB1.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IBB1.DE has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IBB1.DE trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBB1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBB1.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IBB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SPFD.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SPFD.DE has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SPFD.DE trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SPFD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs MDBU.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, MDBU.DE has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while MDBU.DE trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to MDBU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to MDBU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs MDBA.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, MDBA.DE has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while MDBA.DE trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to MDBA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to MDBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XHYA.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XHYA.DE has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XHYA.DE trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XHYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XHYA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs CBUJ.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, CBUJ.DE has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while CBUJ.DE trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to CBUJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to CBUJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IPAB.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IPAB.DE has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IPAB.DE trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPAB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IPAB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IPAB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XHYG.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XHYG.DE has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XHYG.DE trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XHYG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XHYG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs DBXP.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, DBXP.DE has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while DBXP.DE trades at $172.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to DBXP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IPAB.F Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IPAB.F has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IPAB.F trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPAB.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IPAB.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IPAB.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs LYXD.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, LYXD.DE has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while LYXD.DE trades at $167.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYXD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to LYXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to LYXD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs MTDD.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, MTDD.DE has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while MTDD.DE trades at $155.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTDD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to MTDD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to MTDD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EGV5.F Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EGV5.F has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EGV5.F trades at $125.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV5.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EGV5.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EGV5.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EUNU.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EUNU.DE has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EUNU.DE trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EUNU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SPF1.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SPF1.DE has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SPF1.DE trades at $41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPF1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPF1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SPF1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SPF2.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SPF2.DE has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SPF2.DE trades at $34.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPF2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SPF2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SPF2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs 0P00012I68.F Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P00012I68.F has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while 0P00012I68.F trades at $128.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00012I68.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00012I68.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to 0P00012I68.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs 0P0000J59O.F Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P0000J59O.F has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while 0P0000J59O.F trades at $156.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000J59O.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0000J59O.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to 0P0000J59O.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs 0P000019FE.F Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P000019FE.F has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while 0P000019FE.F trades at $136.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000019FE.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P000019FE.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to 0P000019FE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IBCI.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IBCI.DE has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IBCI.DE trades at $229.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IBCI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs ZPRC.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, ZPRC.DE has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while ZPRC.DE trades at $46.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPRC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPRC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to ZPRC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SYBD.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SYBD.DE has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SYBD.DE trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYBD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SYBD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SYBD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IS0X.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IS0X.DE has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IS0X.DE trades at $77.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS0X.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IS0X.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IS0X.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SYBB.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SYBB.DE has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SYBB.DE trades at $56.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYBB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SYBB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SYBB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs VGEM.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, VGEM.DE has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while VGEM.DE trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to VGEM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to VGEM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XYPD.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XYPD.DE has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XYPD.DE trades at $146.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYPD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XYPD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XYPD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XY4P.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XY4P.DE has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XY4P.DE trades at $178.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XY4P.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XY4P.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XY4P.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs TRDE.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, TRDE.DE has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while TRDE.DE trades at $30.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRDE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to TRDE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to TRDE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs LYQ6.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, LYQ6.DE has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while LYQ6.DE trades at $197.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYQ6.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to LYQ6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to LYQ6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs NADB.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, NADB.DE has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while NADB.DE trades at $139.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to NADB.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to NADB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs TRDX.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, TRDX.DE has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while TRDX.DE trades at $31.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRDX.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to TRDX.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to TRDX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs E15H.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, E15H.DE has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while E15H.DE trades at $141.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E15H.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to E15H.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to E15H.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EUNR.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EUNR.DE has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EUNR.DE trades at $109.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EUNR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IEXA.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IEXA.DE has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IEXA.DE trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEXA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IEXA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IEXA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs V3GE.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, V3GE.DE has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while V3GE.DE trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3GE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to V3GE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to V3GE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XDGU.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XDGU.DE has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XDGU.DE trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XDGU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XDGU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XDGE.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XDGE.DE has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XDGE.DE trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XDGE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XDGE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IS0M.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IS0M.DE has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IS0M.DE trades at $152.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS0M.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IS0M.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IS0M.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SUA0.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SUA0.DE has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SUA0.DE trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUA0.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SUA0.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SUA0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XAT1.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XAT1.DE has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XAT1.DE trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAT1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XAT1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XAT1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs LYEB.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, LYEB.DE has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while LYEB.DE trades at $151.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYEB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to LYEB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to LYEB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SYB3.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SYB3.DE has a market cap of 963.57M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SYB3.DE trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYB3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SYB3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SYB3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs 36BA.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, 36BA.DE has a market cap of 954.75M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while 36BA.DE trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 36BA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to 36BA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to 36BA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs NADB.F Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, NADB.F has a market cap of 950.07M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while NADB.F trades at $137.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADB.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to NADB.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to NADB.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs X1GD.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, X1GD.DE has a market cap of 950.02M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while X1GD.DE trades at $196.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X1GD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to X1GD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to X1GD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs KX1G.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, KX1G.DE has a market cap of 949.76M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while KX1G.DE trades at $229.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KX1G.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to KX1G.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to KX1G.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IBCM.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IBCM.DE has a market cap of 946.50M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IBCM.DE trades at $187.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IBCM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EUN3.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EUN3.DE has a market cap of 903.27M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EUN3.DE trades at $79.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EUN3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EUN3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EFRN.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EFRN.DE has a market cap of 874.15M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EFRN.DE trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFRN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EFRN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EFRN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EUNX.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EUNX.DE has a market cap of 861.65M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EUNX.DE trades at $80.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNX.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNX.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EUNX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IBCL.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IBCL.DE has a market cap of 852.77M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IBCL.DE trades at $168.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IBCL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IE3E.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IE3E.DE has a market cap of 832.77M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IE3E.DE trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE3E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IE3E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IE3E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SXRP.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SXRP.DE has a market cap of 832.38M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SXRP.DE trades at $132.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SXRP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XGII.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XGII.DE has a market cap of 830.20M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XGII.DE trades at $187.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGII.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XGII.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XGII.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs XGIU.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, XGIU.DE has a market cap of 828.16M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while XGIU.DE trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGIU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to XGIU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to XGIU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs 5UOA.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, 5UOA.DE has a market cap of 814.02M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while 5UOA.DE trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5UOA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to 5UOA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to 5UOA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs SYBC.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, SYBC.DE has a market cap of 798.74M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while SYBC.DE trades at $53.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYBC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to SYBC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to SYBC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs IBC9.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, IBC9.DE has a market cap of 790.82M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while IBC9.DE trades at $78.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC9.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC9.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to IBC9.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs EMIE.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, EMIE.DE has a market cap of 775.87M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while EMIE.DE trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMIE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to EMIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to EMIE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.
IE000WJWZK35.SG vs TRDS.DE Comparison
IE000WJWZK35.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE000WJWZK35.SG stands at N/A. In comparison, TRDS.DE has a market cap of 709.00M. Regarding current trading prices, IE000WJWZK35.SG is priced at $5.42, while TRDS.DE trades at $31.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE000WJWZK35.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRDS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE000WJWZK35.SG's ROE is N/A, compared to TRDS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE000WJWZK35.SG is more volatile compared to TRDS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE000WJWZK35.SG.