iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) IBGS.L Peers
See (IBGS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
IBGS.L vs CE31.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CE31.L has a market cap of 159.71B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while CE31.L trades at $9,638.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE31.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE31.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to CE31.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs MTXX.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, MTXX.L has a market cap of 145.87B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while MTXX.L trades at $4,130.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to MTXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs CE01.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CE01.L has a market cap of 72.45B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while CE01.L trades at $12,700.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to CE01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs EHYB.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, EHYB.L has a market cap of 19.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while EHYB.L trades at $3,297.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to EHYB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs AT1D.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AT1D.L has a market cap of 15.64B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while AT1D.L trades at $1,430.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1D.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to AT1D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IB01.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IB01.L has a market cap of 14.87B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IB01.L trades at $115.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IB01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IB01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to IB01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs UB82.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, UB82.L has a market cap of 11.74B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while UB82.L trades at $2,891.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB82.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB82.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to UB82.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs GBP5.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GBP5.L has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while GBP5.L trades at $965.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBP5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBP5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to GBP5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IEML.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IEML.L has a market cap of 7.61B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IEML.L trades at $44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEML.L's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEML.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IEML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IGBE.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IGBE.L has a market cap of 7.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IGBE.L trades at $3,273.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGBE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IGBE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs GILI.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GILI.L has a market cap of 5.94B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while GILI.L trades at $12,909.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to GILI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs CBU7.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CBU7.L has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while CBU7.L trades at $137.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBU7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBU7.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to CBU7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs GLBL.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GLBL.L has a market cap of 5.69B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while GLBL.L trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBL.L's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLBL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to GLBL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IBTA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IBTA.L has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IBTA.L trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to IBTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SDIA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SDIA.L has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SDIA.L trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to SDIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs LQDE.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LQDE.L has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while LQDE.L trades at $100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to LQDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs CU71.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CU71.L has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while CU71.L trades at $10,396.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU71.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU71.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to CU71.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SEGA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SEGA.L has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SEGA.L trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEGA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to SEGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VECP.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VECP.L has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VECP.L trades at $40.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to VECP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VECA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VECA.L has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VECA.L trades at $43.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to VECA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IDTM.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IDTM.L has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IDTM.L trades at $173.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IDTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XBLC.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XBLC.L has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XBLC.L trades at $158.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBLC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBLC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to XBLC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IUAA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IUAA.L has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IUAA.L trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to IUAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IE15.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IE15.L has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IE15.L trades at $107.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to IE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SUOE.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SUOE.L has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SUOE.L trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to SUOE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IEMB.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IEMB.L has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IEMB.L trades at $87.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs ERNE.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERNE.L has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while ERNE.L trades at $102.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to ERNE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs LQDA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LQDA.L has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while LQDA.L trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to LQDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SE15.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SE15.L has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SE15.L trades at $90.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to SE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs LQDS.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, LQDS.L has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while LQDS.L trades at $7,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to LQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VETA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VETA.L has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VETA.L trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to VETA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VETY.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VETY.L has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VETY.L trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to VETY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IBTM.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IBTM.L has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IBTM.L trades at $131.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IBTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs ERN1.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERN1.L has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while ERN1.L trades at $85.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERN1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERN1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to ERN1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XGLE.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XGLE.L has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XGLE.L trades at $220.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGLE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGLE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to XGLE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IDBT.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IDBT.L has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IDBT.L trades at $127.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDBT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to IDBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IHYU.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IHYU.L has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IHYU.L trades at $96.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYU.L's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IHYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XGGB.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XGGB.L has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XGGB.L trades at $241.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to XGGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs EMGA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, EMGA.L has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while EMGA.L trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMGA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to EMGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SEMB.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SEMB.L has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SEMB.L trades at $6,661.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to SEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XT0D.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XT0D.L has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XT0D.L trades at $60.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to XT0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VDPA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VDPA.L has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VDPA.L trades at $57.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to VDPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs FLOA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, FLOA.L has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while FLOA.L trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLOA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to FLOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XGSI.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XGSI.L has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XGSI.L trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to XGSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VDCA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VDCA.L has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VDCA.L trades at $58.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to VDCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IBTS.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IBTS.L has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IBTS.L trades at $96.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IBTS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SEML.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SEML.L has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SEML.L trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to SEML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs DTLA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, DTLA.L has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while DTLA.L trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to DTLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IBGX.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IBGX.L has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IBGX.L trades at $137.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to IBGX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VCPA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VCPA.L has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VCPA.L trades at $43.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to VCPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XGSG.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XGSG.L has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XGSG.L trades at $2,396.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to XGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IHYA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IHYA.L has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IHYA.L trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYA.L's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IHYA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs 0GGH.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, 0GGH.L has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while 0GGH.L trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GGH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GGH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to 0GGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs AGGG.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, AGGG.L has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while AGGG.L trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to AGGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VSCA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VSCA.L has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VSCA.L trades at $44.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to VSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XHYG.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XHYG.L has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XHYG.L trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to XHYG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VAGS.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VAGS.L has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VAGS.L trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to VAGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SDIG.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SDIG.L has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SDIG.L trades at $100.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to SDIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs ERNA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERNA.L has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while ERNA.L trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to ERNA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VDTA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VDTA.L has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VDTA.L trades at $26.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to VDTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs ERNS.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERNS.L has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while ERNS.L trades at $102.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to ERNS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs CORP.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CORP.L has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while CORP.L trades at $87.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to CORP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs EMSA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, EMSA.L has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while EMSA.L trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to EMSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs CRHG.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CRHG.L has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while CRHG.L trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRHG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to CRHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IDTL.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IDTL.L has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IDTL.L trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IDTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IGTM.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IGTM.L has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IGTM.L trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IGTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs EMCA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, EMCA.L has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while EMCA.L trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to EMCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XZE5.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XZE5.L has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XZE5.L trades at $39.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZE5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZE5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to XZE5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VDEA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VDEA.L has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VDEA.L trades at $57.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to VDEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VDET.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VDET.L has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VDET.L trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to VDET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XDGU.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XDGU.L has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XDGU.L trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to XDGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IBCI.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IBCI.L has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IBCI.L trades at $192.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IBCI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs EMDL.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, EMDL.L has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while EMDL.L trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMDL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMDL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L and EMDL.L have similar daily volatility (0.49).
IBGS.L vs VUTA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VUTA.L has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VUTA.L trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to VUTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs CRPS.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, CRPS.L has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while CRPS.L trades at $66.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to CRPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IBTL.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IBTL.L has a market cap of 998.24M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IBTL.L trades at $244.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IBTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs EEXF.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, EEXF.L has a market cap of 981.88M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while EEXF.L trades at $92.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEXF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEXF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to EEXF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IUAG.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IUAG.L has a market cap of 980.12M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IUAG.L trades at $93.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IUAG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IGLO.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IGLO.L has a market cap of 948.41M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IGLO.L trades at $89.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IGLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs GLAU.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GLAU.L has a market cap of 941.96M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while GLAU.L trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to GLAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VEMT.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VEMT.L has a market cap of 922.41M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VEMT.L trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to VEMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs VEMA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, VEMA.L has a market cap of 914.19M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while VEMA.L trades at $43.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to VEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SDHA.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SDHA.L has a market cap of 904.14M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SDHA.L trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHA.L's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to SDHA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs EFRN.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, EFRN.L has a market cap of 875.55M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while EFRN.L trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFRN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFRN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to EFRN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs TIGR.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, TIGR.L has a market cap of 835.19M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while TIGR.L trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIGR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to TIGR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SDHY.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SDHY.L has a market cap of 812.94M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SDHY.L trades at $88.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY.L's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to SDHY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs HYLD.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HYLD.L has a market cap of 811.31M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while HYLD.L trades at $87.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLD.L's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to HYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs GCVB.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GCVB.L has a market cap of 808.91M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while GCVB.L trades at $51.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCVB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCVB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to GCVB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SUAG.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SUAG.L has a market cap of 742.03M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SUAG.L trades at $70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to SUAG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs IBGL.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, IBGL.L has a market cap of 714.32M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while IBGL.L trades at $144.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to IBGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs HYGU.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, HYGU.L has a market cap of 704.48M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while HYGU.L trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to HYGU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SGLO.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SGLO.L has a market cap of 704.21M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SGLO.L trades at $68.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to SGLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs EMCR.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, EMCR.L has a market cap of 703.94M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while EMCR.L trades at $90.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMCR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to EMCR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs ERND.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, ERND.L has a market cap of 701.72M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while ERND.L trades at $101.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to ERND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XGIG.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XGIG.L has a market cap of 698.25M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XGIG.L trades at $2,413.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGIG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is more volatile compared to XGIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs JNKE.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, JNKE.L has a market cap of 625.56M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while JNKE.L trades at $52.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNKE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNKE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to JNKE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs XUHY.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, XUHY.L has a market cap of 617.31M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while XUHY.L trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUHY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to XUHY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs SDHG.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, SDHG.L has a market cap of 614.98M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while SDHG.L trades at $67.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to SDHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
IBGS.L vs GLCB.L Comparison
IBGS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBGS.L stands at 1.65B. In comparison, GLCB.L has a market cap of 611.29M. Regarding current trading prices, IBGS.L is priced at $119.50, while GLCB.L trades at $39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBGS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBGS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLCB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBGS.L is less volatile compared to GLCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBGS.L.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBGS.L | $119.50 | -0.88% | 1.65B | N/A | N/A | +2.80% |
| CE31.L | $9,638.00 | -0.91% | 159.71B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MTXX.L | $4,130.25 | -1.14% | 145.87B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CE01.L | $12,700.50 | -1.24% | 72.45B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EHYB.L | $3,297.25 | -0.29% | 19.62B | N/A | N/A | +3.13% |
| AT1D.L | $1,430.10 | +1.17% | 15.64B | N/A | N/A | +0.06% |
| IB01.L | $115.68 | +0.00% | 14.87B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UB82.L | $2,891.00 | +0.07% | 11.74B | N/A | N/A | +2.99% |
| GBP5.L | $965.10 | -0.09% | 10.16B | N/A | N/A | +4.25% |
| IEML.L | $44.20 | -0.72% | 7.61B | 1.32 | $33.40 | +5.61% |